Zinc Absorption from Fortified Milk Powder in Adolescent Girls.

Zinc (Zn) is essential for development, growth, and reproduction. The Mexican government subsidizes micronutrient-fortified milk for risk groups, with positive effect on the targeted groups' plasma Zn level, inferring a good absorption is achieved although it has not being measured. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of micronutrient-fortified milk intake during 27 days on Zn absorption in adolescent girls from northwest Mexico. Therefore, Zn absorption was evaluated in 14 healthy adolescent girls (14.1 years old) with adequate plasma Zn levels, before and after 27 days of fortified Zn milk intake. Fractional Zn absorption (FZA) was calculated from urinary ratios of stable isotopic Zn tracers administered orally and intravenously on days 0 and 27, and total absorbed Zn (TZA) was calculated. At the beginning, Zn intake was 6.8 ± 0.85 mg/d (mean ± SE), and 50 % of the adolescent girls did not achieve their requirement (7.3 mg/d). Additionally, FZA was negatively correlated with Zn intake (r =-0.61, p = 0.02), while TZA (1.06 mg/d) was insufficient to cover the physiologic requirements of adolescent girls (3.02 mg/d). At the end of the intervention, all the girls reached the Zn intake recommendation and TZA, 3.09 mg/d, which was enough to meet the physiological requirement for 57 % of the adolescent girls. Therefore, the low Zn intake and the Zn status of adolescent girls were positively impacted by Zn-fortified milk intake and its good absorption rate.

Zinc fortification decreases ZIP1 gene expression of some adolescent females with appropriate plasma zinc levels.

Zinc homeostasis is achieved after intake variation by changes in the expression levels of zinc transporters. The aim of this study was to evaluate dietary intake (by 24-h recall), absorption, plasma zinc (by absorption spectrophotometry) and the expression levels (by quantitative PCR), of the transporters ZIP1 (zinc importer) and ZnT1 (zinc exporter) in peripheral white blood cells from 24 adolescent girls before and after drinking zinc-fortified milk for 27 day. Zinc intake increased (p < 0.001) from 10.5 ± 3.9 mg/day to 17.6 ± 4.4 mg/day, and its estimated absorption from 3.1 ± 1.2 to 5.3 ± 1.3 mg/day. Mean plasma zinc concentration remained unchanged (p > 0.05) near 150 µg/dL, but increased by 31 µg/dL (p < 0.05) for 6/24 adolescents (group A) and decreased by 25 µg/dL (p < 0.05) for other 6/24 adolescents (group B). Expression of ZIP1 in blood leukocytes was reduced 1.4-fold (p < 0.006) in group A, while for the expression of ZnT1 there was no difference after intervention (p = 0.39). An increase of dietary zinc after 27-days consumption of fortified-milk did not increase (p > 0.05) the plasma level of adolescent girls but for 6/24 participants from group A in spite of the formerly appropriation, which cellular zinc uptake decreased as assessed by reduction of the expression of ZIP1.

Effect of micronutrient-fortified milk on zinc intake and plasma concentration in adolescent girls.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of dietary fortified milk with zinc and other micronutrients on zinc intake and plasma zinc content of adolescent girls. METHODS: The study included 108 schoolgirls (12-18 years old) from northwest Mexico, randomly assigned to either the control group (CG; n = 55) or the intervention group consuming a regular diet plus fortified milk (MG; n = 53). At the beginning of the study, age, weight, and height were measured. Food intake by the 24-hour recall method and plasma zinc levels assessed by absorption spectrophotometry were determined before and after 27 days of fortified milk intake. RESULTS: At baseline, no significant group-related differences were observed for energy, protein intake, zinc intake, and plasma zinc level (p > 0.05), and 35.2% of participant girls did not achieve their zinc requirement. After 27 days of treatment, there were no significant differences in energy and protein intake between groups (p > 0.05). Zinc intake was higher for MG than CG (16.7 ± 8.3 mg/d vs 10.5 ± 6.4 mg/d; p < 0.01), and there was a lower proportion of low zinc intake in MG than for CG (7 vs 16, respectively; p = 0.04). In addition, plasma zinc improved in the MG (116.6 ± 26.9 µg/dL, p < 0.01) compared with CG (98.5 ± 26.6 µg/dL), and it was mainly attributed to the fortified milk intake, as the main dietary zinc contributor. CONCLUSION: Fortified milk intake is effective in increasing both intake and plasma zinc levels of adolescent Mexican girls; therefore, it could be an adequate strategy for zinc deficiency prevention or correction among adolescent girls.

Estimación de la masa grasa por DXA y el modelo de cuatro compartimentos en púberes mexicanos de 9 a 14 años / Estimation of body fat by DXA and the four compartment model in Mexican youth

Se evaluó la precisión y exactitud en la estimación de la grasa corporal (%) por absorciometría dual de rayos X (DXA Lunar-DPX-MD) comparado con el modelo de cuatro compartimentos (4C) en 32 púberes (F=16) de 9 a 14 años. El sesgo entre la DXA y el modelo de 4C fue de -3.5% de grasa (r=0.25; p=0.171) con un intervalo de confianza de -1.9 a -5.1 (p=0.050). Los límites de concordancia al 95% fueron de +5% a -12% de grasa. El coeficiente de correlación de concordancia fue de pc=0.85. La prueba de exactitud por análisis de regresión mostró que el intercepto y la pendiente de las estimaciones de grasa corporal por DXA fueron diferentes al modelo de 4C (p>0.05). La precisión evaluada con el valor de R2 mostró que la DXA explicó el 83% de la varianza de la grasa corporal por el modelo de 4C con un error de 4.1%. El error total como medida de exactitud fue de 5.6%. La exactitud grupal evaluada por análisis de varianza no mostró interacción entre el método (DXA-4C) y el análisis por separado del sexo, el estado puberal y la presencia de sobrepeso. No obstante, hubo efecto del método (p=0.043) en presencia de sobrepeso (p<0.001). En conclusión, los resultados muestran que el uso de la DXA comparado con el modelo de 4C no es equivalente en púberes mexicanos. Sin embargo, estos datos no limitan el uso de la DXA en estudios de composición corporal y su relación con anormalidades metabólicas.

The objective of this study was to validate the estimation of body fat (%BF) by DXA (Dual-Energy X-Ray AbsorciomDPX-MD) against the four compartment model (4C) of body composition in 32 Mexican pubertal girls and boys (aged 9 - 14y; F=16). The mean of the difference between DXA and 4C model was -3.5 %BF (p=0.171). The limits of agreement (95% ± 2 SD) were +5% to -12%BF. The precision of estimated limits of y the confidence intervals were -1.9% to -5.1%BF (P=0.050). The concordance correlation coefficient was pc= 0.85. The test of accuracy for coincidence of slop intercepts between DXA and the 4C model showed no coincidence (p< 0.05). The precision by R2 explained 83% of the variance (SEE, 4.1 %). The individual accuracy assess by the total error was 5.6%. The group mean accuracy by two way analysis of variance of body fat did not show interaction between method (DXA-4C model) and separate analysis of gender and overweight. However, there was an effect of method (p=0.043) in the presence of overweight (p<0.001). In conclusion, the estimation of percent of body fat by DXA was not precise and accurate in a group of Mexican children. However, results do not limit the utility of DXA for the measurements of body composition and its relation with health outcomes, especially in follow up studies.

Could giardiasis be a risk factor for low zinc status in schoolchildren from northwestern Mexico? A cross-sectional study with longitudinal follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Both giardiasis and zinc deficiency are serious health problems worldwide. In Mexico, the prevalence of G. intestinalis was estimated at 32% in 1994. It remains a health problem in northwestern Mexico. Recent surveys (1987, 1995, and 1999) reported zinc deficiency in the Mexican population. The association of giardiasis and malabsorption of micronutrients has been well documented, although the association with zinc remains controversial. This study investigated the association between giardiasis and zinc deficiency in schoolchildren from northwestern Mexico. METHODS: We combined a cross-sectional design with a longitudinal follow-up six months after parasite treatment. The baseline sample consisted of 114 schoolchildren (mean age 8.8 yr) from seven suburban public schools, grouped as Giardia-free (n = 65, 57%) and Giardia-infected (n = 49, 43%). Three stool analyses per child were done using Faust's method. Children with giardiasis received secnidazole. Serum zinc was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Height and weight were measured. Socioeconomic information was obtained in an oral questionnaire, and daily zinc intake was assessed using 24 hour-recalls. Pearson's correlation and ANCOVA and paired t-test analyses were used to determine the association between giardiasis and zinc status. RESULTS: Longitudinal analysis demonstrated a significant increase of the mean serum zinc levels in the Giardia-infected group six months after treatment (13.78 vs. 19.24 mumol/L mumol/L; p = 0.001), although no difference was found between the Giardia-free and the Giardia-infected groups (p = 0.86) in the baseline analysis. Z scores for W/A and H/A were lower in the Giardia-infected than in the Giardia-free group (p < 0.05). No difference was observed in the socioeconomic characteristics and mean daily intakes of zinc between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Giardiasis may be a risk factor for zinc deficiency in schoolchildren from northwestern Mexico.

[Estimation of body fat by DXA and the four compartment model in Mexican youth]. / Estimación de la masa grasa por DXA y el modelo de cuatro compartimentos en púiberes mexicanos de 9 a 14 años.

The objective of this study was to validate the estimation of body fat (%BF) by DXA (Dual-Energy X-Ray AbsorciomDPX-MD) against the four compartment model (4C) of body composition in 32 Mexican pubertal girls and boys (aged 9-14 y; F=16). The mean of the difference between DXA and 4C model was -3.5 %BF (p=0.171). The limits of agreement (95% = 2 SD) were +5% to -12%BF. The precision of estimated limits of y the confidence intervals were -1.9% to -5.1%BF (P = 0.050). The concordance correlation coefficient was p = 0.85. The test of accuracy for coincidence of slop intercepts between DXA and the 4C model showed no coincidence (p < 0.05). The precision by R2 explained 83% of the variance (SEE, 4.1%). The individual accuracy assess by the total error was 5.6%. The group mean accuracy by two way analysis of variance of body fat did not show interaction between method (DXA-4C model) and separate analysis of gender and overweight. However, there was an effect of method (p = 0.043) in the presence of overweight (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the estimation of percent of body fat by DXA was not precise and accurate in a group of Mexican children. However, results do not limit the utility of DXA for the measurements of body composition and its relation with health outcomes, especially in follow up studies.

Four-compartment model and validation of deuterium dilution technique to estimate fat-free mass in Mexican youth.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the measurement of fat-free mass (FFM) with the deuterium oxide (D(2)O) dilution technique (2C) against the four-compartment (4C) model in Mexican children. METHODS: This was designed as a cross-sectional, non-probabilistic study. Sixty subjects (30 male and 30 female) 6-14 y of age were recruited and completed the study during 5 mo. Total body water was measured using the D(2)O dilution technique and FFM was calculated using Fomon's (6-10 y) and Lohman's (11-14 y) hydration constants. Body composition using the 4C model was calculated with Lohman's equation. RESULTS: Group mean accuracy showed no differences in FFM determined by D(2)O dilution and the 4C model (1.24 kg, P > 0.4), by gender (2.1 kg, P > 0.2), or by method-by-gender interaction (P > 0.7). FFMs were 26.9 and 25.7 kg by the 4C and 2C models, respectively. The test for coincidence of slopes and intercepts between the 2C and 4C models and the line of identity were not different (P > 0.05). Precision by R(2) explained 98% of the variance (standard error of the estimate 1.2 kg). Bias for the difference in FFM was not significant (-1.27, 95% confidence interval -1.5 to -0.9) and no association between the mean of the differences and the magnitude of the measurements was found (P > 0.05). Mean bias was -1.27 kg for FFM (P > 0.05), and limits of agreement were -3.1 to 0.8 kg. CONCLUSION: The D(2)O dilution technique used with these hydration constants was accurate, precise, and free of bias in Mexican children and adolescents compared with the 4C model.