Utilidad de una aplicación web interactiva en la mejora del control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Proyecto Control-RC / Impact of an interactive web application on the improvement of cardiovascular risk factors control. Control-RCV project

Objetivo Valorar la utilidad de una aplicación web interactiva en la mejora del control del riesgo cardiovascular (CV). Métodos Estudio observacional en el que médicos de Atención Primaria, incluyeron consecutivamente a pacientes con un riesgo CV elevado/muy elevado y al menos uno de los siguientes factores de riesgo mal controlado: hipertensión, dislipidemia o diabetes. Al introducir los datos, la aplicación generaba un informe indicando los objetivos recomendados y los reales, y el médico podía modificar la actitud terapéutica. El estudio consistió en 2visitas: basal y a los 4-6 meses. Resultados Se incluyó a 379 pacientes (66,4 ± 9,0 años; 67,3% varones; 67,5/32,5% con un riesgo CV elevado/muy elevado). Basalmente, la mayoría recibió recomendaciones sobre la restricción de sal (90,2%), dieta (94,2%) y actividad física (94,5%). En cuanto al tratamiento farmacológico, el 53,6% no tomaba combinaciones fijas. Solo el 35,1% cumplía siempre con el tratamiento. En el 95,8% se realizó educación sanitaria, en el 29,8% se empleó la polipíldora y en el 24,3% se incidió sobre los cambios en hábitos de vida. En la segunda visita se objetivó una mejoría significativa de los cambios en el estilo de vida (menor tabaquismo y consumo de alcohol, y mayor actividad física, restricción de sal, dieta), factores de riesgo CV (menor obesidad, presión arterial, lípidos, HbA1c), así como una reducción del riesgo CV. El cumplimiento terapéutico mejoró. Conclusiones El empleo de la aplicación permite mejorar los estilos de vida y el control de los factores de riesgo, reduciendo el riesgo CV y mejorando el cumplimiento terapéutico (AU)

Objective To ascertain the utility of an interactive web application in the improvement of cardiovascular (CV) risk control. Methods Observational study in which primary care physicians consecutively included high/very high CV risk patients with at least one of the following risk factors poorly controlled: hypertension, dyslipidemia or diabetes. After the introduction of data, the application generated a report comparing the recommended and the real targets. Then, the physicians could modify the therapeutic approach. The study consisted of 2 visits, at baseline and after 4-6 months. Results A total of 379 patients (66.4±9.0 years; 67.3% male; 67.5/32.5% with high/very high CV risk) were included. At baseline, most patients received recommendations about salt restriction (90.2%), diet (94.2%), and physical activity (94.5%). With regard to pharmacological treatments, 53.6% of patients were not taking fixed-dose combinations. Only 35.1% met always with treatment. In 95.8% of patients sanitary education was given, in 29.8% the polypill was prescribed and in 24.3% lifestyle changes were recommended. During the second visit, a significant improvement in lifestyle changes (less smoking and alcohol consumption, and more physical activity, salt restriction and diet), CV risk factors (less obesity, blood pressure, lipids, HbA1c), as well as CV risk reduction were observed. The therapeutic compliance also improved. Conclusions The use of the application allows improving lifestyle and CV risk factors control, leading to a reduction of CV risk and an improvement of therapeutic compliance (AU)

[Impact of an interactive web application on the improvement of cardiovascular risk factors control. Control-RCV project]. / Utilidad de una aplicación web interactiva en la mejora del control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Proyecto Control-RCV.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the utility of an interactive web application in the improvement of cardiovascular (CV) risk control. METHODS: Observational study in which primary care physicians consecutively included high/very high CV risk patients with at least one of the following risk factors poorly controlled: hypertension, dyslipidemia or diabetes. After the introduction of data, the application generated a report comparing the recommended and the real targets. Then, the physicians could modify the therapeutic approach. The study consisted of 2 visits, at baseline and after 4-6 months. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients (66.4±9.0 years; 67.3% male; 67.5/32.5% with high/very high CV risk) were included. At baseline, most patients received recommendations about salt restriction (90.2%), diet (94.2%), and physical activity (94.5%). With regard to pharmacological treatments, 53.6% of patients were not taking fixed-dose combinations. Only 35.1% met always with treatment. In 95.8% of patients sanitary education was given, in 29.8% the polypill was prescribed and in 24.3% lifestyle changes were recommended. During the second visit, a significant improvement in lifestyle changes (less smoking and alcohol consumption, and more physical activity, salt restriction and diet), CV risk factors (less obesity, blood pressure, lipids, HbA1c), as well as CV risk reduction were observed. The therapeutic compliance also improved. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the application allows improving lifestyle and CV risk factors control, leading to a reduction of CV risk and an improvement of therapeutic compliance.

[Diagnosis of atherogenic dyslipidaemia by primary care physicians in Spain]. / Diagnóstico de la dislipidemia aterogénica por los médicos de atención primaria en España.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the diagnostic management of patients with atherogenic dyslipidaemia (AD) by primary care physicians (PC). METHODOLOGY: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted based on a structured questionnaire. The content of the questionnaire was based on a review of the literature, and was validated by 3 AD experts. It included 23 questions, and was addressed to primary care physicians (PC). This sub-study will analyse questions related to the detection and diagnosis of AD. RESULTS: A total of 1,029 PC participated in the study. Almost all (96.99%) said that DA is a determining factor for cardiovascular risk (CVR), even with LDL-C targets. Residual CVR was evaluated by 88.43% in their clinical practice, but only 27.89% in secondary prevention. Most of the PCs used LDL-c-non-HDL-c (55.49% vs 20.02%) in AD as a control objective, and 15.35% used TG, and 9.14% HDL-C. For the diagnosis of AD, 82.22% used TC, TG, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C. PC physicians used the TC / HDL-C atherogenic ratio (53.06%) and LDL-C / HDL-C ratio (49.56%), considering them useful / very useful (86.30% and 85.04%, respectively), with only 28.08% using the TG / HDL-C index, with 69.29% considering it useful / very useful. CONCLUSIONS: The PCs have a high level of knowledge of the guidelines. Underdiagnosis continues, with heterogeneity in determining objectives, and low use of the TG / HDL-C index to evaluate these patients. Greater awareness is needed for the detection and diagnosis of AD.