Direct binding to GABARAP family members is essential for HIV-1 Nef plasma membrane localization.

HIV-1 Nef is an important pathogenic factor for HIV/AIDS pathogenesis. Studies have shown that the association of Nef with the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane and with endocytic and perinuclear vesicles is essential for most activities of Nef. Using purified recombinant proteins in pull-down assays and by co-immunoprecipitation assays we demonstrate that Nef binds directly and specifically to all GABARAP family members, but not to LC3 family members. Based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments we showed that Nef binds to GABARAP via two surface exposed hydrophobic pockets. S53 and F62 of GABARAP were identified as key residues for the interaction with Nef. During live-cell fluorescence microscopy an accumulation of Nef and all GABARAP family members in vesicular structures throughout the cytoplasm and at the plasma membrane was observed. This plasma membrane accumulation was significantly reduced after knocking down GABARAP, GABARAPL1 and GABARAPL2 with respective siRNAs. We identified GABARAPs as the first known direct interaction partners of Nef that are essential for its plasma membrane localization.

Brain transcriptome-wide screen for HIV-1 Nef protein interaction partners reveals various membrane-associated proteins.

HIV-1 Nef protein contributes essentially to the pathology of AIDS by a variety of protein-protein-interactions within the host cell. The versatile functionality of Nef is partially attributed to different conformational states and posttranslational modifications, such as myristoylation. Up to now, many interaction partners of Nef have been identified using classical yeast two-hybrid screens. Such screens rely on transcriptional activation of reporter genes in the nucleus to detect interactions. Thus, the identification of Nef interaction partners that are integral membrane proteins, membrane-associated proteins or other proteins that do not translocate into the nucleus is hampered. In the present study, a split-ubiquitin based yeast two-hybrid screen was used to identify novel membrane-localized interaction partners of Nef. More than 80% of the hereby identified interaction partners of Nef are transmembrane proteins. The identified hits are GPM6B, GPM6A, BAP31, TSPAN7, CYB5B, CD320/TCblR, VSIG4, PMEPA1, OCIAD1, ITGB1, CHN1, PH4, CLDN10, HSPA9, APR-3, PEBP1 and B3GNT, which are involved in diverse cellular processes like signaling, apoptosis, neurogenesis, cell adhesion and protein trafficking or quality control. For a subfraction of the hereby identified proteins we present data supporting their direct interaction with HIV-1 Nef. We discuss the results with respect to many phenotypes observed in HIV infected cells and patients. The identified Nef interaction partners may help to further elucidate the molecular basis of HIV-related diseases.

Competitively selected protein ligands pay their increase in specificity by a decrease in affinity.

Protein-ligand interactions characterise and govern the current state and fate of a living cell. The specificity of proteins is mainly determined by the relative affinities to each potential ligand. To investigate the consequences and potentials of ligands with increased specificity in comparison with ligands optimised solely for affinity, it was necessary to identify ligands that are optimised towards specificity instead of a barely optimised affinity to a given target. In the presented example, a modified phage display screening procedure yielded specific ligands for the LckSH3 domain. We found that increased specificity of one of the hereby obtained ligands for LckSH3 is achieved at the cost of a slightly reduced affinity to LckSH3 and a drastically reduced affinity to other SH3 domains. A surface plasmon resonance experiment simulating in vivo-like realistic competitive binding conditions exerted enhanced binding behaviour of the specific ligand under these binding conditions. The experimental data, together with a mathematical model describing the complex experimental situation, and theoretical considerations lead to the conclusion that increased specificity is achieved at the cost of reduced affinity, but after all, it pays if the ligand is applied under realistic, i.e. competitive, conditions.