General Anesthesia versus Conscious Sedation in Mechanical Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anesthesia regimen in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is still an unresolved issue. METHODS: We compared the effect of anesthesia regimen using data from the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET) between June 2015 and December 2019. Degree of disability was rated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and good outcome was defined as mRS 0-2. Successful reperfusion was assumed when the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale was 2b-3. RESULTS: Out of 6,635 patients, 67.1% (n=4,453) patients underwent general anesthesia (GA), 24.9% (n=1,650) conscious sedation (CS), and 3.3% (n=219) conversion from CS to GA. Rate of successful reperfusion was similar across all three groups (83.0% vs. 84.2% vs. 82.6%, P=0.149). Compared to the CA-group, the GA-group had a delay from admission to groin (71.0 minutes vs. 61.0 minutes, P<0.001), but a comparable interval from groin to flow restoration (41.0 minutes vs. 39.0 minutes). The CS-group had the lowest rate of periprocedural complications (15.0% vs. 21.0% vs. 28.3%, P<0.001). The CS-group was more likely to have a good outcome at follow-up (42.1% vs. 34.2% vs. 33.5%, P<0.001) and a lower mortality rate (23.4% vs. 34.2% vs. 26.0%, P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, GA was associated with reduced achievement of good functional outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 0.94; P=0.004) and increased mortality (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.64; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis for anterior circulation strokes (n=5,808) showed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: We provide further evidence that CS during MT has advantages over GA in terms of complications, time intervals, and functional outcome.

Oscillometric versus invasive blood pressure measurement in patients with shock: a prospective observational study in the emergency department.

In emergency medicine, blood pressure is often measured by an oscillometric device using an upper arm cuff. However, measurement accuracy of this technique in patients suffering from hypotensive shock has not been sufficiently evaluated. We designed a prospective observational study investigating the accuracy of an oscillometric device in hypotensive patients admitted to the resuscitation area of the emergency department. Patients admitted to the resuscitation area of a university hospital, who were equipped with an arterial catheter and found to be hypotensive (mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg) were eligible for the study. Blood pressure was measured simultaneously via upper arm cuff and invasively under routine clinical conditions. After data extraction, Bland-Altman analysis, correlation coefficient and percentage error of mean and systolic blood pressure pairs were performed. We analysed 75 simultaneously obtained blood pressure measurements of 30 patients in hypotension, 11 (37%) were female, median age was 76.5 years (IQR 63-82). Oscillometric MAP was markedly higher than invasive MAP with a mean of the differences of 13 ± 15 mmHg (oscillometric-invasive), 95% limits of agreement - 16 to 41 mmHg, percentage error was 76%. In 64% of readings, values obtained by the upper arm cuff were not able to detect hypotension. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement is not able to reliably detect hypotension in emergency patients. Therefore, direct measurement of blood pressure should be established as soon as possible in patients suffering from shock.

Impaired Consciousness in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: The approach to unconscious patients in the emergency department (ED) is difficult, often depends on local resources and interests, and workup strategies often lack standardization. One reason for this is that data on causes, management, and outcome of patients who present to the ED with sudden onset unconsciousness of unknown cause is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to analyze the causes of acute impaired consciousness in patients in an interdisciplinary ED. METHODS: Here, we analyzed all patients who were admitted to the ED of a tertiary care hospital with the dominating symptom of "sudden onset unconsciousness" within 1 year (September 2014 until August 2015). Patients with a clear diagnosis at arrival that explained the altered state of consciousness or other dominating symptoms at the time of arrival were not included. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were analyzed. In 88% of the patients, a final diagnosis could be established in the ED. Most common causes for unconsciousness were cerebrovascular diseases (24%), infections (14%), epileptic seizures (12%), psychiatric diseases (8%), metabolic causes (7%), intoxications (7%), transient global amnesia (5%), and cardiovascular causes (4%). The diagnoses were predominantly established by physical examination in combination with computed tomography (23%) and by the results of laboratory testing (25%). In-hospital mortality was 11%, and 59% of all patients were discharged with a Glasgow Outcome Score of 2-4. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates a large variety of etiologies in patients with unknown unconsciousness of acute onset who are admitted to an ED. As neurological diagnoses are among the most common etiologies, neurological qualification is required in the ED, and availability of diagnostics such as cerebral imaging is indispensable and recommended as an early step in a standardized clinical approach.