Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Med ; 12(2): 1102-1113, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35852473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To explore the prognosis predicting ability of the combined factors, Epstein-Barr virus DNA change level (EBVCL) and tumor volume reduction ratio (TVRR) after inductive chemotherapy (IC), in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). METHODS: From 2010 to 2018, 299 LANPC patients were included in this retrospective study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to acquire the best critical values. According to the best critical values of EBVCL and TVRR, patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups. Kaplan-Meier and ROC curve analyses were utilized to verify the prognostic ability of the new predictor (EBVCL+TVRR). The prognostic values among EBVCL+TVRR, EBVCL, TVRR, TNM stage, and the RECIST 1.1 criteria were compared by ROC curve. The primary end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS). RESULTS: ROC curve analyses of TVRR on three-year survival showed the best critical values of TVRR was 32.72% for OS, 30.21% for PFS and LRFFS, 29.87% for DMFS. The best critical value of EBVCL was 127 copies/ml for OS, and 87.7 copies/ml for PFS, DMFS, and LRFFS. The three-year OS, PFS, DMFS, and LRFFS for low- and high-risk groups were 97.7% versus 78.3% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.2398; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1277-0.4502; p < 0.0001), 91.1% versus 60.9% (HR = 0.3294; 95% CI: 0.2050-0.5292; p < 0.0001), 94.2% versus 68.7% (HR = 0.2413; 95% CI: 0.1284-0.4535; p < 0.0001) and 97.8% versus 77.9% (HR = 0.3078; 95% CI: 0.1700-0.5573; p = 0.0001), respectively. The maximal area under ROC curve of EBVCL+TVRR, EBVCL, TVRR, TNM stage, and RECIST 1.1 criteria for three-year OS was 0.829, 0.750, 0.711, 0.555, and 0.605, respectively. CONCLUSION: The new-developed indicator (EBVCL+TVRR) could better predict the LANPC patient's survival after IC compared with TNM stage system or RECIST 1.1 criteria.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patología , Pronóstico , Herpesvirus Humano 4/genética , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carga Tumoral , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patología , ADN Viral , Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Front Immunol ; 13: 1039157, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36451822

RESUMEN

Introduction: The efficacy of immunotherapy for treatment of patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at different metastatic sites remains controversial. We investigated the effect of different metastatic sites on immunotherapy for oligometastatic NSCLC following local treatment (LT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with oligometastatic NSCLC from the latest 2018 registry on the SEER Stat software (8.3.9. Version) and a Chinese single-center cohort. The effects of immunotherapy on OS (overall survival) and CSS (cancer specific survival) were estimated for patients with different metastatic sites. Results: A total of 483 patients in the SEER-18 database and 344 patients in the single-center cohort were included. Immunotherapy was significantly correlated with improved OS (SEER: Hazard ratio 0.754, 95% CI 0.609-0.932; P=0.044; China: Hazard ratio 0.697, 95% CI 0.542-0.896; P=0.005) and CSS (SEER: Hazard ratio 0.743, 95% CI 0.596-0.928; P=0.009; China: Hazard ratio 0.725, 95% CI 0.556-0.945; P=0.018). Subgroup analysis showed that OS was improved after immunotherapy in the BRM (SEER: Hazard ratio 0.565, 95% CI 0.385-0.829; P=0.004; China: Hazard ratio 0.536, 95% CI 0.312-0.920; P=0.024) and MOM (SEER: Hazard ratio 0.524, 95% CI 0.290-0.947; P=0.032; China: Hazard ratio 0.469, 95% CI 0.235-0.937; P=0.032) subgroups, but not in the BOM (SEER: P=0.334; China: P=0.441), LIM (SEER: P=0.301; China: P=0.357), or OTM (SEER: P=0.868; China: P=0.489) subgroups. Conclusions: This study showed that immunotherapy conferred survival benefits on patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. Our subgroup analysis suggested that patients with oligometastatic NSCLC in the brain or multiple organs may particularly benefit from aggressive front-line therapies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Inmunoterapia , Factores Inmunológicos
3.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 327, 2021 Mar 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33785010

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To compare the prognostic value of 7th and 8th editions of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system for patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and simultaneous integrated boost- intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT). METHODS: Patients with NPC (n = 300) who received SIB-IMRT were included. Survival by T-classification, N-classification, and stage group of each staging system was assessed. RESULTS: For T-classification, nonsignificant difference was observed between T1 and T3 and between T2 and T3 disease (P = 0.066 and 0.106, respectively) for overall survival (OS) in the 7th staging system, whereas all these differences were significant in the 8th staging system (all P < 0.05). The survival curves for disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) in both staging systems were similar, except for the comparison of T2 and T4 disease for LRRFS (P = 0.070 for 7th edition; P = 0.011 for 8th edition). For N-classification, significant differences were observed between N2 and N3 diseases after revision (P = 0.046 and P = 0.043 for OS and DFS, respectively). For staging system, no significant difference was observed between IVA and IVB of 7th edition. CONCLUSION: The 8th AJCC staging system appeared to have superior prognosis value in the SIB-IMRT era compared with the 7th edition.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/epidemiología , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico
6.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(9): 5084-5095, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33580420

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on patient outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial. We aimed to establish a model to identify the subsets benefiting from PMRT and to examine the effect of PMRT according to molecular subtype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1118 cT1-4cN0-3M0 breast cancer patients treated with NAC and mastectomy. A nomogram predicting locoregional recurrence (LRR) was established based on 418 unirradiated patients, and X-tile analysis was performed to divide the patients into two risk groups. The effect of PMRT on LRR, distant recurrence (DR), and breast cancer mortality (BCM) was estimated for patients with different molecular subtypes in two risk groups. RESULTS: A nomogram predicting LRR was developed using six factors: histologic classification, lymphovascular invasion, ypT stage, ypN stage, estrogen receptor status, and Ki-67 expression. Our study found that PMRT correlated with lower 5-year LRR, DR, and BCM rates for the high-risk group; however, no significant improvement in these endpoints was observed in the low-risk group. Among patients with high risk, subgroup analysis showed that LRR control was improved after PMRT for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative/hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HER2-/HR+), HER2-positive (HER2+)/HR+, and HER2-/HR-negative (HR-) subtypes, with hazard ratios of 0.113 (95% confidence [CI] 0.034-0.379; p < 0.001), 0.159 (95% CI 0.038-0.671; p = 0.017), and 0.243 (95% CI 0.088-0.676; p = 0.007), respectively, but not for the HER2+/HR- subtype (p = 0.468). CONCLUSIONS: We built a nomogram showing favorable risk quantification and patient stratification. Patients in the high-risk group benefited from PMRT, but patients in the low-risk group did not. PMRT may show different benefits for each molecular subtype.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Oral Oncol ; 111: 104924, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32736209

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the prognostic value of the sum volumetric regression ratio (SVRR) of the primary tumour and metastatic lymph nodes with treatment response based on RECIST 1.1 criteria after induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 117 stage III-IVA NPC patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively reviewed. The SVRR and the treatment response based on RECIST 1.1 were measured using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) localisations before and after induction chemotherapy. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the optimal cutoff point of the SVRR and compare the prognostic value of the SVRR and RECIST 1.1criteria. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff points of SVRR for progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were all 25.15%, while for overall survival (OS) it was 16.63%. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of optimal cutoff points of SVRR was superior than that of RECIST 1.1 for PFS (AUC: 0.716 vs. 0.578; P = 0.0022), LRFFS (AUC: 0.700 vs. 0.574; P = 0.0080) and DMFS (AUC: 0.736 vs. 0.606; P = 0.0053), respectively. The 3-year PFS, DMFS and OS rates for SVRR less than vs. greater than or equal to the cutoff points were 55.8% vs. 92.2% (P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR): 0.209, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.091-0.480), 59.7% vs. 96.7% (P < 0.001, HR: 0.120, 95% CI: 0.043-0.336) and 66.7% vs. 98.1% (P < 0.001, HR: 0.069, 95% CI: 0.014-0.342), while the responses [stable disease (SD), partial response (PR)] based on RECIST 1.1 were not significantly associated with 3-year survival rates. Multivariate analysis indicated that SVRR was an independent prognostic factor for PFS, DMFS and OS (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The sum volumetric regression ratio and response based on RECIST 1.1 were related to the prognosis in locoregionally advanced NPC after induction chemotherapy. Sum volumetric regression ratio is an independent outcome predictor for survival in locoregionally advanced NPC, playing a better prognostic role than RECIST 1.1.


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Carga Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patología , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Curva ROC , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral/efectos de la radiación
8.
Head Neck ; 41(6): 1863-1872, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30620441

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We explored whether the volumetric reduction ratio of target lesion after induction chemotherapy (IC) had any prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: From 2013 to 2016, 72 NPC patients treated with PCF (paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) IC followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy were analyzed. The volumes of target lesions before and after IC and survival conditions were assessed. RESULTS: For all cases, volumetric reduction ratios of the total tumor load ≥ optimal cutoff values were significantly associated with increased 2-year progression-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates, and for cervical lymph nodes, the volumetric reduction ratio ≥ optimal cutoff value was significant for DMFS (all P < .05). Accordingly, the optimal cutoff values were 24.56% (AUC = 60.5%), 23.91% (AUC = 57.7%), 29.77% (AUC = 75.8%), and 34.17% (AUC = 62.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Volumetric reductions of target lesions after IC are independent survival predictors for NPC, especially for those with N2/N3 disease.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patología , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/mortalidad , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...