Correlation between lung function tests and peak oxygen consumption in post-TB lung disease.

BACKGROUND: After TB treatment, many patients have post-TB lung disease (PTLD), associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nevertheless, relationships between lung function testing and exercise capacity in people with PTLD are poorly understood.METHODS: This single-centre study investigated the association between lung function testing and peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) and percentage-predicted VO2peak (VO2peak (%pred)) in adults with PTLD investigated for surgery.RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (52 males, 30 females) with a mean age of 43.2 years (SD 11.3) were included. Spirometric values of forced vital capacity (FVC) percentage predicted (%pred) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) %pred suggested significant correlations with VO2peak (%pred) (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), whereas FEV1/FVC did not. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) %pred also correlated significantly with VO2peak (%pred) (P = 0.002). However, the magnitude of all significant correlation coefficients were weak. No significant correlations for any plethysmographic values with VO2peak (%pred) could be robustly concluded. Correlations with VO2peak (ml/kg/min) for most physiological variables were less robust than for VO2peak (%pred).CONCLUSIONS: Although statistically significant, the correlations between any measure of lung function and VO2peak or VO2peak (%pred) were weak, with only FVC correlation coefficient surpassing 0.50.

Could human challenge studies for COVID-19 vaccines be justified in South Africa?

Although human challenge studies (HCSs) have been widely employed in vaccine development for malaria, dengue, typhoid and cholera, the role of this research design in COVID-19 remains controversial. While the potential social value of HCSs in the context of a pandemic is clear, bioethicists are divided on the ethics, given that effective treatment for COVID-19 has eluded us to date. While compelling ethics arguments have been offered on both sides of the debate, scientific and regulatory complexities may not have been fully appreciated. Furthermore, accelerated development of efficacious vaccine candidates in traditional clinical trials has diluted some of the arguments in favour of HCSs. In low- and middle-income country settings, including South Africa, the need for robust patient care conditions for the conduct of HCSs, coupled with considerations such as perceptions of risk, consent processes, remuneration, vaccine hesitancy, fear of exploitation and access to vaccines, makes HCSs challenging to justify.