The association between restricted intra-uterine growth and inadequate postnatal nutrition in very-low-birth-weight infants and their neurodevelopmental outcomes: a 50-month follow-up study.

Inadequate nutrition during a critical period of development - as is the case during gestation and the first days of life, especially in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants, can impact on neurodevelopment and favour co-morbidities. In this study, we evaluate how neurodevelopment may be affected by intra-uterine growth (IUGR) restriction and by an inadequate intake of nutritional energy during the early neonatal period. A longitudinal cohort study was conducted to analyse the nutritional contributions received during the first week of life, among a population of 396 VLBW infants. Motor, cognitive, sensory and behavioural development was assessed at 14, 25, 33 and 50 months. The association between IUGR, postnatal energy restriction and neurodevelopment was examined using multivariate logistic regression techniques. Mild cognitive delay was observed in 35·6 % of neonates with IUGR and in 24 % of those with appropriate birth weight. IUGR is associated with behavioural disorder (OR 2·60; 95 % CI 1·25, 5·40) and delayed cognitive development (OR 2·64; 95 % CI 1·34, 5·20). Energy restriction during the first week of life is associated with visual deficiency (OR 2·96; 95 % CI 1·26, 6·84) and cerebral palsy (OR 3·05; CI 95 % 1·00, 9·54). In VLBW infants, IUGR is associated with behavioural disorder, while postnatal energy restriction is significantly associated with motor disorder, infantile cerebral palsy and sensory disorder.

Methylphenidate ameliorates the homeostatic balance between levels of kynurenines in ADHD children.

The kynurenine pathway of tryptophan metabolism has been involved in ADHD We quantified basal levels and daily fluctuations of tryptophan and several kynurenine metabolites, as well as their changes after treatment with methylphenidate (MPH). A total of 179 children were recruited, grouped into ADHD (n = 130) and healthy controls (CG,n = 49). Blood samples were drawn at 20:00 and 09:00 h and only in the ADHD group after 4.63±2.3 months of treatment. Nocturnal urine was collected between both draws. Factorial analysis (Stata12.0) was performed with Groups, Time, Hour of Day and Depressive Symptoms (DS) as factors. MPH significantly increased plasma Kynurenic acid (2.4 ± 1.03/2.78±1.3 ng/mL; baseline/post-treatment, morning; z = 1.96,p<0.05) and Xanthurenic acid (2.39±0.95/2.88±1.19 ng/mL; baseline/post, morning; z = 2.7,p<0.007) levels, both with higher values in the evening. In DS+ patients, MPH caused a pronounced decrease in evening Anthranilic acid [3.08±5.02/ 1.82±1.46 ng/mL, z = 2.68,p = 0.0074] until matching values to other subgroups. In urine, MPH decreased the excretion of both Nicotinamide and Quinolinic acids, but only in the DS- subgroup. The kynurenine pathway may participate in the highly clinical favorable response to MPH. The observed changes could be considered as protective (i.e. increased plasma kynurenic acid vs. decreased quinolinic acid excretion) based on the knowledge of its physiological homeostatic functions.

Indole Tryptophan Metabolism and Cytokine S100B in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Daily Fluctuations, Responses to Methylphenidate, and Interrelationship with Depressive Symptomatology.

Background: Indole tryptophan metabolites (ITMs), mainly produced at the gastrointestinal level, participate in bidirectional gut-brain communication and have been implicated in neuropsychiatric pathologies, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: A total of 179 children, 5-14 years of age, including a healthy control group (CG, n = 49), and 107 patients with ADHD participated in the study. The ADHD group was further subdivided into predominantly attention deficit (PAD) and predominantly hyperactive impulsive (PHI) subgroups. Blood samples were drawn at 20:00 and 09:00 hours, and urine was collected between blood draws, at baseline and after 4.63 ± 2.3 months of methylphenidate treatment in the ADHD group. Levels and daily fluctuations of ITM were measured by tandem mass spectrometer, and S100B (as a glial inflammatory marker) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Factorial analysis of variance (Stata 12.0) was performed with groups/subgroups, time (baseline/after treatment), hour of day (morning/evening), and presence of depressive symptoms (DS; no/yes) as factors. Results: Tryptamine and indoleacetic acid (IAA) showed no differences between the CG and ADHD groups. Tryptamine exhibited higher evening values (p < 0.0001) in both groups. No changes were associated with methylphenidate or DS. At baseline, in comparison with the rest of study sample, PHI with DS+ group showed among them much greater morning than evening IAA (p < 0.0001), with treatment causing a 50% decrease (p = 0.002). Concerning indolepropionic acid (IPA) MPH was associated with a morning IPA decrease and restored the daily profile observed in the CG. S100B protein showed greater morning than evening concentrations (p = 0.001) in both groups. Conclusion: Variations in ITM may reflect changes associated with the presence of DS, including improvement, among ADHD patients.

BDNF concentrations and daily fluctuations differ among ADHD children and respond differently to methylphenidate with no relationship with depressive symptomatology.

RATIONALE: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) enhances the growth and maintenance of several monoamine neuronal systems, serves as a neurotransmitter modulator and participates in the mechanisms of neuronal plasticity. Therefore, BDNF is a good candidate for interventions in the pathogenesis and/or treatment response of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). OBJECTIVE: We quantified the basal concentration and daily fluctuation of serum BDNF, as well as changes after methylphenidate treatment. METHOD: A total of 148 children, 4-5 years old, were classified into groups as follows: ADHD group (n = 107, DSM-IV-TR criteria) and a control group (CG, n = 41). Blood samples were drawn at 2000 and 0900 hours from both groups, and after 4.63 ± 2.3 months of treatment, blood was drawn only from the ADHD group for BDNF measurements. Factorial analysis was performed (Stata software, version 12.0). RESULTS: Morning BDNF (36.36 ± 11.62 ng/ml) in the CG was very similar to that in the predominantly inattentive children (PAD), although the evening concentration in the CG was higher (CG 31.78 ± 11.92 vs PAD 26.41 ± 11.55 ng/ml). The hyperactive-impulsive group, including patients with comorbid conduct disorder (PHI/CD), had lower concentrations. Methylphenidate (MPH) did not modify the concentration or the absence of daily BDNF fluctuations in the PHI/CD children; however, MPH induced a significant decrease in BDNF in PAD and basal day/night fluctuations disappeared in this ADHD subtype. This profile was not altered by the presence of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support a reduction in BDNF in untreated ADHD due to the lower concentrations in PHI/CD children, which is similar to other psychopathologic and cognitive disorders. MPH decreased BDNF only in the PAD group, which might indicate that BDNF is not directly implicated in the methylphenidate-induced amelioration of the neuropsychological and organic immaturity of ADHD patients.

Nutrition in extremely low birth weight infants: impact on bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a chronic lung disease that affects premature infants with multifactorial etiology. Some authors have considered malnutrition to be a major factor promoting BDP. The aim of our study was to examine the contribution of enteral and parenteral nutritional intake in the first 14 days of life to the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in a sample of preterm infants. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on all preterm infants born between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2013. The nutritional parameters compiled included the cumulative amount of fluids, calories, proteins, carbohydrates and lipids consumed. Statistical analysis of the data consisted of a descriptive analysis, Mann-Whitney pairwise comparison test and logistic regression. RESULTS: The total caloric intake in the infants studied was significantly lower in patients with subsequent bronchopulmonary dysplasia (76.1 kCal/kg, 95% CI: 71.2-81.1 vs. 91.1 kCal/kg, 95% CI: 87.5-94.8). The intake of carbohydrate and fat was significantly lower in the patients with BPD (11.6 g/kg, 95% CI: 11.1-12.0 vs. 12.6 g/kg, 95% CI: 12.1-13; and 2.5 g/kg, 95% CI: 2.3-2.7 vs. 3.4 g/kg, 95% CI: 2.9-3.9, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that infants who develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia receive a lower enteral intake of calories and total lipids during the first 14 days of life.

[Combined treatment with antiepileptic drugs. Andalusian Epilepsy Guide 2015]. / Tratamiento combinado con fármacos antiepilépticos. Guía Andaluza de Epilepsia 2015.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to draw up a set of recommendations based on scientific evidence and in agreement with authors and reviewers, which address fundamental issues concerning the combination of antiepileptic drugs. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia (SAdE--Andalusian Epilepsy Society), of whom seven were neurologists, three were neuropaediatricians and one was a neurologist-neurophysiologist, all of them with long experience in epilepsy, promoted a comprehensive literature review among 55 experts in epilepsy who were members of the SAdE, with the aim of searching for any evidence that might be available on diagnostic or therapeutic matters in epilepsy. The guidelines were set out in 35 chapters. One of the chapters addressed the combination of antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of epilepsy. Taking 77 bibliographical references and the consensus view of authors and reviewers as their starting point, a set of easily applicable recommendations were drawn up. CONCLUSIONS: Combining antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy whose seizures are not controlled with a single drug can, on many occasions, result in their going back into remission. There are a series of factors related with the type of epilepsy and characteristics of the patient and with the antiepileptic drugs to be used in combination that may favour a successful therapeutic outcome. Over-treatment with the combination of antiepileptic drugs must be avoided as far as possible. The results of this review provide a set of recommendations regarding combined treatment with antiepileptic drugs, based on scientific evidence and the agreement of authors, that are simple, useful and easy to apply at the different levels of healthcare.

TITLE: Tratamiento combinado con farmacos antiepilepticos. Guia Andaluza de Epilepsia 2015.Objetivo. Elaborar unas recomendaciones basadas en evidencias cientificas y en consenso de los autores y revisores, que aborden las cuestiones basicas acerca de la combinacion de farmacos antiepilepticos. Desarrollo. Un comite de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia (SAdE), constituido por siete neurologos, tres neuropediatras y un neurologo-neurofisiologo, todos con especial competencia en epilepsia, promovieron la realizacion de una revision bibliografica exhaustiva entre 55 expertos en epilepsia pertenecientes a la SAdE, en busca de evidencias disponibles relacionadas con temas diagnosticos o terapeuticos en epilepsia. La guia se estructuro en 35 capitulos. Uno de los capitulos abordo la combinacion de farmacos antiepilepticos en el tratamiento de la epilepsia. Basandose en 77 citas bibliograficas y en la opinion consensuada de autores y revisores, se confecciono una serie de recomendaciones de facil aplicacion. Conclusiones. La combinacion de farmacos antiepilepticos en los pacientes con epilepsia cuyas crisis no estan controladas con un solo farmaco puede conseguir en numerosas ocasiones que entren en remision. Existe una serie de factores relacionados con el tipo de epilepsia y caracteristicas del paciente y con los farmacos antiepilepticos que se van a utilizar en combinacion que pueden favorecer el exito terapeutico. Se debe evitar en lo posible el sobretratamiento con la combinacion de farmacos antiepilepticos. Los resultados de esta revision proveen unas recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento combinado con farmacos antiepilepticos, basadas en evidencias cientificas y en el consenso de los autores, utiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales.

Tratamiento combinado con fármacos antiepilépticos. Guía Andaluza de Epilepsia 2015 / Combined treatment with antiepileptic drugs. Andalusian Epilepsy Guide 2015

Objetivo. Elaborar unas recomendaciones basadas en evidencias científicas y en consenso de los autores y revisores, que aborden las cuestiones básicas acerca de la combinación de fármacos antiepilépticos. Desarrollo. Un comité de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia (SAdE), constituido por siete neurólogos, tres neuropediatras y un neurólogo-neurofisiólogo, todos con especial competencia en epilepsia, promovieron la realización de una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva entre 55 expertos en epilepsia pertenecientes a la SAdE, en busca de evidencias disponibles relacionadas con temas diagnósticos o terapéuticos en epilepsia. La guía se estructuró en 35 capítulos. Uno de los capítulos abordó la combinación de fármacos antiepilépticos en el tratamiento de la epilepsia. Basándose en 77 citas bibliográficas y en la opinión consensuada de autores y revisores, se confeccionó una serie de recomendaciones de fácil aplicación. Conclusiones. La combinación de fármacos antiepilépticos en los pacientes con epilepsia cuyas crisis no están controladas con un solo fármaco puede conseguir en numerosas ocasiones que entren en remisión. Existe una serie de factores relacionados con el tipo de epilepsia y características del paciente y con los fármacos antiepilépticos que se van a utilizar en combinación que pueden favorecer el éxito terapéutico. Se debe evitar en lo posible el sobretratamiento con la combinación de fármacos antiepilépticos. Los resultados de esta revisión proveen unas recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento combinado con fármacos antiepilépticos, basadas en evidencias científicas y en el consenso de los autores, útiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales (AU)

Aim. To draw up a set of recommendations based on scientific evidence and in agreement with authors and reviewers, which address fundamental issues concerning the combination of antiepileptic drugs. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia (SAdE - Andalusian Epilepsy Society), of whom seven were neurologists, three were neuropaediatricians and one was a neurologist-neurophysiologist, all of them with long experience in epilepsy, promoted a comprehensive literature review among 55 experts in epilepsy who were members of the SAdE, with the aim of searching for any evidence that might be available on diagnostic or therapeutic matters in epilepsy. The guidelines were set out in 35 chapters. One of the chapters addressed the combination f antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of epilepsy. Taking 77 bibliographical references and the consensus view of authors and reviewers as their starting point, a set of easily applicable recommendations were drawn up. Conclusions. Combining antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy whose seizures are not controlled with a single drug can, on many occasions, result in their going back into remission. There are a series of factors related with the type of epilepsy and characteristics of the patient and with the antiepileptic drugs to be used in combination that may favour a successful therapeutic outcome. Over-treatment with the combination of antiepileptic drugs must be avoided as far as possible. The results of this review provide a set of recommendations regarding combined treatment with antiepileptic drugs, based on scientific evidence and the agreement of authors, that are simple, useful and easy to apply at the different levels of healthcare (AU)

Methylphenidate ameliorates depressive comorbidity in ADHD children without any modification on differences in serum melatonin concentration between ADHD subtypes.

UNLABELLED: The vast majority of Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patients have other associated pathologies, with depressive symptoms as one of the most prevalent. Among the mediators that may participate in ADHD, melatonin is thought to regulate circadian rhythms, neurological function and stress response. To determine (1) the serum baseline daily variations and nocturnal excretion of melatonin in ADHD subtypes and (2) the effect of chronic administration of methylphenidate, as well as the effects on symptomatology, 136 children with ADHD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision: DSM-IV-TR criteria) were divided into subgroups using the "Children's Depression Inventory" (CDI). Blood samples were drawn at 20:00 and 09:00 h, and urine was collected between 21:00 and 09:00 h, at inclusion and after 4.61 ± 2.29 months of treatment. Melatonin and its urine metabolite were measured by radioimmunoassay RIA. Factorial analysis was performed using STATA 12.0. Melatonin was higher predominantly in hyperactive-impulsive/conduct disordered children (PHI/CD) of the ADHD subtype, without the influence of comorbid depressive symptoms. Methylphenidate ameliorated this comorbidity without induction of any changes in the serum melatonin profile, but treatment with it was associated with a decrease in 6-s-melatonin excretion in both ADHD subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: In untreated children, partial homeostatic restoration of disrupted neuroendocrine equilibrium most likely led to an increased serum melatonin in PHI/CD children. A differential cerebral melatonin metabolization after methylphenidate may underlie some of the clinical benefit.

Differential responses of two related neurosteroids to methylphenidate based on ADHD subtype and the presence of depressive symptomatology.

RATIONALE: Attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with alterations in the prefrontal cortex via dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission. Neurosteroids (e.g. allopregnanolone and dehydroepiandrosterone) modulate the release of multiple neurotransmitters. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the baseline concentrations and daily variations in allopregnanolone and dehydroepiandrosterone in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to determine the effect of chronic administration of methylphenidate on clinical symptoms and on the concentrations of these two neurosteroids. METHODS: We included 148 children aged 5 to 14 years, subdivided into two groups: ADHD group (n = 107, with a diagnosis of ADHD (DSM-IV-TR criteria), further classified in subtypes by an "attention deficit and hyperactivity scale" and subgroups by the "Children's Depression Inventory") and a control group (n = 41). The clinical workup included blood samples that were drawn at 20:00 and 09:00 hours, at inclusion in both groups, and after 4.61 ± 2.29 months of treatment only in the ADHD group, for measurements for allopregnanolone and dehydroepiandrosterone. Factorial analysis, adjusted for age and gender, was performed by using Stata 12.0. RESULTS: Methylphenidate induced the doubling of allopregnanolone levels in the predominantly inattentive ADHD patients without depressive symptoms (27.26 ± 12.90 vs. 12.67 ± 6.22 ng/ml, morning values). Although without statistical differences, baseline dehydroepiandrosterone levels were higher and slightly increased after methylphenidate in the ADHD subtype with depressive symptoms (7.74 ± 11.46 vs. 6.18 ± 5.99 ng/ml, in the morning), opposite to the lower baseline levels, and further decrease after methylphenidate in the inattentive subtype with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Different neurosteroids may have different baseline concentrations and differential responses to methylphenidate treatment as a function of ADHD subtype and subgroup. These differential responses may be a clinical marker of ADHD subtype and/or co-morbidities.