Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dermatitis ; 31(5): 287-296, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32091460

RESUMEN

Allergic contact dermatitis is a prevalent burdensome condition affecting millions of Americans. Patch testing, the criterion-standard allergic contact dermatitis diagnostic tool, is underused by US dermatologists. Incorporating patch testing into modern dermatology practices is achievable with utilization of accurate resources and sustainable support. This review focuses on the basics of patch testing and provides practical pearls to assist novice providers in establishing a contact dermatitis specialty practice.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Parche/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Dermatología/normas , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Dermatitis ; 30(2): 164-167, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30829809

RESUMEN

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) has been traditionally identified as TH1-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. There is currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved systemic therapy indicated for ACD. Among patients with ACD, there is a subgroup that experience not only concomitant atopic dermatitis and ACD but also systemic allergic dermatitis driven by allergens encountered through dietary consumption. Basic science and clinical studies have supported the notion that ACD involves a complex interaction between both TH1 and TH2 axes of the secondary immune system on an allergen-by-allergen basis. Herein, we report the patients with systemic allergy syndrome with dermatitis to either Balsam of Peru or nickel who achieved remarkable improvement and regained their quality of life without continuing adherence to strict diets. Our study suggests that dupilumab may be an efficacious solution for a particular subgroup of patients with recalcitrant ACD when first- and second-line therapies have failed.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/terapia , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Interleucina-4/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/complicaciones , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
G Ital Dermatol Venereol ; 154(1): 42-49, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29998717

RESUMEN

Systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) describes a hypersensitivity reaction following systemic re-exposure of the inciting allergen in previously sensitized individuals. Plants, drugs, and metals are the most common causes of SCD. In individuals with obstinate dermatitis, it is imperative to deliver history-focused patch testing with subsequent avoidance and elimination of the compound.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Humanos , Metales/efectos adversos , Metales/inmunología , Plantas/efectos adversos , Plantas/inmunología
7.
Dermatitis ; 30(1): 46-53, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30570582

RESUMEN

Allergic contact dermatitis is a common disease within the family of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. In more severe cases of allergic contact dermatitis, topical steroids may prove insufficient, and systemic therapeutic agents are often used. Even when systemic therapies such as cyclosporine lead to improvement, withdrawal of these agents is challenging and can lead to undesirable morbidities. Currently, there are no systemic treatments indicated for the treatment of widespread recalcitrant contact dermatitis. This review discusses the targets of in-use off-label systemic medications and potential therapeutics in the pipeline.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores
8.
Dermatitis ; 29(5): 244-249, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29923849

RESUMEN

: Carmine is a widely used "natural" food additive that has been reported to provoke both an immediate hypersensitivity and a delayed systemic response with cutaneous expression. Systemic contact dermatitis describes the hypersensitivity reaction following systemic re-exposure of the inciting allergen in previously sensitized individuals. In individuals with recalcitrant dermatitis and a positive carmine intolerance history and/or patch test, it is important to consider a trial topical and dietary elimination of carmine-associated products and foods.


Asunto(s)
Carmín/efectos adversos , Colorantes/efectos adversos , Dermatitis por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis por Contacto/etiología , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Asma/etiología , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche
9.
Dermatitis ; 29(3): 107-111, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29613858

RESUMEN

Allergic contact dermatitis is associated with significant disease and economic burden in the United States. To properly manage allergic contact dermatitis, it is important to accurately identify the substance(s) implicated in the dermatitis to prevent disease recurrence. The commercially available T.R.U.E Test (36 allergens) screening panel has been reported to have a conservative hypothetical allergen detection rate of 66.0%, at most. Importantly, these calculations are based on the 78% of patients who had clinically relevant reactions to allergens present on the North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series (70 allergens), without the use of supplemental allergens. Testing with supplemental allergens beyond a screening series can more fully evaluate an individual's environmental and occupational exposure, which may significantly increase diagnostic accuracy. Comprehensive patch testing with additional allergens in sunscreens, cosmetics, and fragrances, for example, may increase the diagnostic yield as well as the likelihood of achieving a cure if the dermatitis is chronic and recalcitrant.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Humanos
12.
Dermatitis ; 29(2): 85-88, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29494395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) remains a significant burden of disease in the United States. Patch testing is the criterion standard for diagnosing ACD, but its use may be limited by reimbursement challenges. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the current rate of patch test utilization among dermatologists in academic, group, or private practice settings to understand different patch testing business models that address these reimbursement challenges. METHODS: All members of the American Contact Dermatitis Society received an online survey regarding their experiences with patch testing and reimbursement. RESULTS: A "yes" response was received from 28% of survey participants to the question, "Are you or have you been less inclined to administer patch tests or see patients needing patch tests due to challenges with receiving compensation for patch testing?" The most commonly reported barriers include inadequate insurance reimbursement and lack of departmental support. CONCLUSIONS: Compensation challenges to patch testing limit patient access to appropriate diagnosis and management of ACD. This can be addressed through a variety of innovative business models, including raising patch testing caps, negotiating relative value unit compensation, using a fixed salary model with directorship support from the hospital, and raising the percentages of collection reimbursement for physicians.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatología/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Pruebas del Parche/economía , Pruebas del Parche/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Dermatología/organización & administración , Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica de Grupo/economía , Práctica de Grupo/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Económicos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Privada/economía , Práctica Privada/estadística & datos numéricos , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Sociedades Médicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
13.
Cutis ; 93(5): E13-6, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24897146

RESUMEN

Alopecia areata (AA) is a complication of biologic therapy with several anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and efalizumab for the treatment of various autoimmune diseases. We report the case of a 51-year-old woman who developed AA universalis while undergoing treatment with daclizumab, an immunosuppressive biologic therapy, administered for treatment of inflammatory ocular disease. Although immunomodulatory agents that function by interfering with T helper cell stimulation are expected to impede autoimmune-related processes, we believe that daclizumab may be causally related to the development of AA.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata/inducido químicamente , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Inmunoglobulina G/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Uveítis/tratamiento farmacológico , Alopecia Areata/patología , Daclizumab , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
14.
Dermatol Online J ; 17(10): 29, 2011 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22031655

RESUMEN

Chemical leukoderma is defined as an acquired, hypopigmented dermatosis that results from repeated cutaneous application of an agent that destroys epidermal melanocytes in genetically susceptible patients. Chemical leukoderma may develop both at the site of contact with the chemical as well as remotely from the exposure. Avoidance of the causative agent may lead to spontaneous repigmentation, but treatments commonly used in vitiligo, such as narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy, PUVA photchemotherapy, or topical immunosuppressants, often are necessary. We present a case of chemical leukoderma secondary to pyrethroid insecticides that has progressed despite avoidance of the agent for over ten years.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Hipopigmentación/inducido químicamente , Insecticidas/efectos adversos , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Piretrinas/efectos adversos , Dermatosis Facial/inducido químicamente , Dermatosis Facial/patología , Humanos , Hipopigmentación/patología , Masculino , Melanocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Melanocitos/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/inducido químicamente , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA