RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidance on how best to treat chronic depression is limited. Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) has shown some promise with this 'difficult-to-treat' clinical group. This case series was designed to assess the acceptability and utility of this novel treatment in routine clinical practice within the U.K. National Health Service. METHODS: We offered an open trial of CBASP to a cohort of 115 referred patients within primary and secondary care. Diagnostic interview and standardised outcome measures were administered before and after 6 months of CBASP with a trained, accredited therapist. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients entered therapy, with 46 completing. 30% met criteria for remission (≤ 8 HRSD-24 score) and a further 30% met criteria for clinically significant change (> 8 and ≤15 HRSD-24 plus 50% reduction in baseline score). Thirty-nine per cent made "No change". Group measures of quality of life, social functioning and interpersonal functioning also improved. LIMITATIONS: This was an open study design with a moderate sample size and no control group. Ratings were not completed using a blinded procedure. CONCLUSIONS: CBASP is an acceptable therapy for a large proportion of patients with chronic depression and was associated with clinically significant change in 60% of completers.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is very limited evidence for the efficacy of any specific therapeutic intervention in chronic, treatment refractory major depression. Thermal anterior capsulotomy (ACAPS) is a rarely performed but established therapeutic procedure for this patient group. While benefit has been claimed, previous ACAPS reports have provided limited information. Detailed prospective reporting of therapeutic effects and side effects is required. OBJECTIVE: To report a prospective study of therapeutic effect, mental status, quality of life, social functioning and neurocognitive functioning in individuals with chronic treatment refractory major depression, treated with ACAPS. METHOD: A prospective case series of 20 patients treated with ACAPS between 1992 and 1999 were reassessed at a mean follow-up of 7.0±3.4 years. Data were collected preoperatively and at long term follow-up. Structural MRI was performed in 14 participants. RESULTS: According to a priori criteria, at long term follow-up, 50% were classified as 'responders' and 40% as 'remitters'. Fifty-five per cent were classified as 'improved'; 35% were 'unchanged'; and 10% had 'deteriorated'. Neurocognitive and personality testing were not significantly different at follow-up. A trend towards improvement in some aspects of executive neuropsychological functioning was observed. Significant adverse effects were infrequent and there were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: ACAPS may represent an effective intervention for some patients with chronic, disabling, treatment refractory major depression that has failed to respond to other therapeutic approaches. The adverse effect burden within this population was modest, with no evidence of generalised impairment of neurocognitive functioning.