Diaphragm pacing decreases hospital charges for patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is devastating and costly. Previous research has demonstrated that diaphragm pacing (DPS) is safe and improves respiratory mechanics. This may decrease hospital stays, vent days, and costs. We hypothesized DPS implantation would facilitate liberation from ventilation and would impact hospital charges. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with acute CSCI between January 2005 and May 2017. Routine demographics were collected. Patients underwent propensity matching based on age, injury severity score, ventilator days, hospital length of stay, and need for tracheostomy. We then adjusted total hospital charges by year using US Bureau of Labor Statistics annual adjusted Medical Care Prices. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression statistics were performed using STATA V.15. RESULTS: Between July 2011 and May 2017, all patients with acute CSCI were evaluated for DPS implantation. 40 patients who had laparoscopic DPS implantation (DPS) were matched to 61 who did not (NO DPS). Following DPS implantation, there was a statistically significant increase in spontaneous Vt compared with NO DPS (+88 mL vs -13 mL; 95% CI 46 to 131 vs -78 to 51 mL, respectively; p=0.004). Median time to liberation after DPS was significantly shorter (10 vs 29 days; 95% CI 6.5 to 13.6 vs 23.1 to 35.3 days; p<0.001). Adjusted hospital charges were significantly lower for DPS on multivariate linear regression models controlling for year of injury, sex, race, injury severity, and age (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: DPS implantation in patients with acute CSCI produces significant improvements in spontaneous Vt and reduces time to liberation, which translated into reduced hospital charges on a risk-adjusted, inflation-adjusted model. DPS implantation for patients with acute CSCI should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Diaphragm pacing improves respiratory mechanics in acute cervical spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is devastating with ventilator-associated pneumonia being a main driver of morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic diaphragm pacing implantation (DPS) has been used for earlier liberation from mechanical ventilation. We hypothesized that DPS would improve respiratory mechanics and facilitate liberation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of acute CSCI patients between January 2005 and May 2017. Routine demographics were collected. Patients underwent propensity score matching based on age, Injury Severity Score, ventilator days, hospital length of stay, and need for tracheostomy. Patients with complete respiratory mechanics data were analyzed and compared. Those who did not have DPS (NO DPS) had spontaneous tidal volume (Vt) recorded at time of intensive care unit admission, at day 7, and at day 14, and patients who had DPS had spontaneous Vt recorded before and after DPS. Time to ventilator liberation and changes in size of spontaneous Vt for patients while on the ventilator were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression statistics were performed using STATA v10. RESULTS: Between July 2011 and May 2017, 37 patients that had DPS were matched to 34 who did not (NO DPS). Following DPS, there was a statistically significant increase in spontaneous Vt compared with NO DPS (+88 mL vs. -13 mL; 95% confidence interval, 46-131 mL vs. -78 to 51 mL, respectively; p = 0.004). Median time to liberation after DPS was significantly shorter (10 days vs. 29 days; 95% CI, 6.5-13.6 days vs. 23.1-35.3 days; p < 0.001). Liberation prior to hospital discharge was not different between the two groups. The DPS placement was found to be associated with a statistically significant decrease in days to liberation and an increase in spontaneous Vt in multivariate linear regression models. CONCLUSION: The DPS implantation in acute CSCI patients produces significant improvements in spontaneous Vt and reduces time to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Prospective comparative studies are needed to define the clinical benefits and potential cost savings of DPS implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Trends in civilian penetrating brain injury: A review of 26,871 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study is to analyze the 5 years' trends, mortality rate, and factors that influence mortality after civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI). METHODS: We performed a 5-year-analysis of all trauma patients diagnosed with pTBI in the TQIP. Our outcome measures were trends of pTBI. RESULTS: A total of 26,871 had penetrating brain injury over the 5-year period. Mean age was 36.2 ±â€¯18 years. Overall 55% of the patients had severe TBI and mortality rate was 43.8%. There was an increase in the rate of pTBI from 3042/100,000 (2010) to 7578/100,000 trauma admissions (2014) (p < 0.001). The mortality rate has increased from 35% (2010) to 48% (2011) (p < 0.001) followed by a linear decrease in mortality to 40% (2014). Independent predictors of mortality were age, pre-hospital intubation, suicide attempt, and craniotomy/craniectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence and mortality for patients who are brought to hospitals following pTBI have gradually increased over the five-year period. Self-inflicted injury and prehospital intubation were the two most significant predictors of mortality.

Use of diaphragm pacing in the management of acute cervical spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is devastating. Respiratory failure, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, and death frequently occur. Case reports of diaphragm pacing system (DPS) have suggested earlier liberation from mechanical ventilation in acute CSCI patients. We hypothesized DPS implantation would decrease VAP and facilitate liberation from ventilation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with acute CSCI managed at a single Level 1 trauma center between January 2005 and May 2017. Routine demographics were collected. Patients underwent propensity matching based on age, injury severity score, ventilator days, hospital length of stay, and need for tracheostomy. Outcome measures included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days (vent days), incidence of VAP, and mortality. Bivariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression statistics were performed using STATA Version 10. RESULTS: Between July 2011 and May 2017, all patients with acute CSCI were evaluated for DPS implantation. Forty patients who had laparoscopic DPS implantation (DPS) were matched to 61 who did not (NO DPS). Median time to liberation after DPS implantation was 7 days. Hospital length of stay and mortality were significantly lower on bivariate analysis in DPS patients. Diaphragm pacing system placement was not found to be associated with statistically significant differences in these outcomes on risk-adjusted multivariate models that included admission year. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragm pacing system implantation in patients with acute CSCI can be one part of a comprehensive critical care program to improve outcomes. However, the association of DPS with the marked improved mortality seen on bivariate analysis may be due solely to improvements in critical care throughout the study period. Further studies to define the benefits of DPS implantation are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.

Management of adult pancreatic injuries: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury to the pancreas is rare but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including fistula, sepsis, and death. There are currently no practice management guidelines for the medical and surgical management of traumatic pancreatic injuries. The overall objective of this article is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the physician who is presented with traumatic injury to the pancreas. METHODS: The MEDLINE database using PubMed was searched to identify English language articles published from January 1965 to December 2014 regarding adult patients with pancreatic injuries. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to formulate evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS: Three hundred nineteen articles were identified. Of these, 52 articles underwent full text review, and 37 were selected for guideline construction. CONCLUSION: Patients with grade I/II injuries tend to have fewer complications; for these, we conditionally recommend nonoperative or nonresectional management. For grade III/IV injuries identified on computed tomography or at operation, we conditionally recommend pancreatic resection. We conditionally recommend against the routine use of octreotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula prophylaxis. No recommendations could be made regarding the following two topics: optimal surgical management of grade V injuries, and the need for routine splenectomy with distal pancreatectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.