A Multi-hospital Before-After Observational Study Using a Point-Prevalence Approach with an Infusion Safety Intervention Bundle to Reduce Intravenous Medication Administration Errors.

INTRODUCTION: We previously found a high rate of errors in the administration of intravenous medications using smart infusion pumps. OBJECTIVES/DESIGN: An infusion safety intervention bundle was developed in response to the high rate of identified errors. A before-after observational study with a prospective point-prevalence approach was conducted in nine hospitals to measure the preliminary effects of the intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were overall errors and medication errors, with the secondary outcome defined as potentially harmful error rates. RESULTS: We assessed a total of 418 patients with 972 medication administrations in the pre-intervention period and 422 patients with 1059 medication administrations in the post-intervention period. The overall error rate fell from 146 to 123 per 100 medication administrations (p < 0.0001), and the medication error rate also decreased from 39 to 29 per 100 medication administrations (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant change in the potentially harmful error rate (from 0.5 to 0.8 per 100 medication administrations, p = 0.37). An intervention component aiming to reduce labeling-not-completed errors was effective in reducing targeted error rates, but other components of the intervention bundle did not show significant improvement in the targeted errors. CONCLUSION: Development and implementation of the intervention bundle was successful at reducing overall and medication error rates, but some errors remained and the potentially harmful error rate did not change. The error-rate reductions were not always correlated with the specific individual interventions. Further investigation is needed to identify the best strategies to reduce the remaining errors. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02359734.

The frequency of intravenous medication administration errors related to smart infusion pumps: a multihospital observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous medication errors persist despite the use of smart pumps. This suggests the need for a standardised methodology for measuring errors and highlights the importance of identifying issues around smart pump medication administration in order to improve patient safety. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a multisite study to investigate the types and frequency of intravenous medication errors associated with smart pumps in the USA. METHODS: 10 hospitals of various sizes using smart pumps from a range of vendors participated. Data were collected using a prospective point prevalence approach to capture errors associated with medications administered via smart pumps and evaluate their potential for harm. RESULTS: A total of 478 patients and 1164 medication administrations were assessed. Of the observed infusions, 699 (60%) had one or more errors associated with their administration. Identified errors such as labelling errors and bypassing the smart pump and the drug library were predominantly associated with violations of hospital policy. These types of errors can result in medication errors. Errors were classified according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP). 1 error of category E (0.1%), 4 of category D (0.3%) and 492 of category C (excluding deviations of hospital policy) (42%) were identified. Of these, unauthorised medication, bypassing the smart pump and wrong rate were the most frequent errors. CONCLUSION: We identified a high rate of error in the administration of intravenous medications despite the use of smart pumps. However, relatively few errors were potentially harmful. The results of this study will be useful in developing interventions to eliminate errors in the intravenous medication administration process.

Effect of barcode technology with electronic medication administration record on medication accuracy rates.

PURPOSE: The effect of barcode-assisted medication administration (BCMA) with electronic medication administration record (eMAR) technology on the occurrence of medication administration errors was evaluated. METHODS: A pretest-posttest nonequivalent comparison group was used to investigate the effect of BCMA-eMAR on the medication administration accuracy rates at two community-based hospitals. Patient care units included three matched pairs in the two hospitals-two medical-surgical, two telemetry, and two rehabilitation units-plus a medical-surgical intensive care unit, an emergency department, and both an inpatient oncology unit and an outpatient oncology service at one of the hospitals. Medication administration accuracy rates were observed and recorded before (phase 1) and approximately 6 and 12 months after (phases 2 and 3, respectively) the implementation of BCMA-eMAR. RESULTS: The overall accuracy rate at hospital 1 increased significantly from phase 1 (89%) to phase 3 (90%) (p = 0.0015); if wrong-time errors are excluded, the accuracy rate improved from 92% in phase 1 to 96% in phase 3 (p = 0.000008). The overall accuracy rate did not change significantly from phase 1 to phase 3 at hospital 2; when wrong-time errors were excluded from consideration, the accuracy rate improved from 93% in phase 1 to 96% in phase 3 (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Implementation of BCMA-eMAR in two hospitals was associated with significant increases in total medication accuracy rates in most study units and did not introduce new types of error into the medication administration process. Accuracy rates further improved when wrong-time errors were excluded from analysis. The frequency of errors preventable by BCMA-eMAR decreased significantly in both hospitals after implementation of that technology. BCMA-eMAR and direct observation were more effective than voluntary reporting programs at intercepting and recording errors and preventing them from reaching patients.

Continuous oximetry/capnometry monitoring reveals frequent desaturation and bradypnea during patient-controlled analgesia.

BACKGROUND: The most serious complication of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is respiratory depression (RD). The incidence of RD in the literature is derived from intermittent sampling of pulse oximetry (Spo(2)) and respiratory rate and defined as a deviation below an arbitrary threshold. METHODS: We monitored postsurgical patients in a hospital ward receiving morphine or meperidine PCA with continuous oximetry and capnography. Nurses responding to audible monitor bedside alarms documented respiratory status and interventions. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were included in the analysis, 12% and 41% of whom had episodes of desaturation (Spo(2) <90%) and bradypnea (respiratory rate <10) lasting 3 min or more. One patient required "rescue" with positive pressure ventilation, and none required naloxone. Patients over 65 years of age and the morbidly obese were at greater risk for desaturation. Patients over 65 years of age were also more likely to have bradypnea, whereas the morbidly obese and patients receiving continuous infusions were less likely to have bradypnea. CONCLUSIONS: Our incidence of RD by bradypnea is significantly higher than the 1%-2% incidence in the literature, using the same threshold criteria but more stringent duration criteria, while our incidence of RD based on desaturation is consistent with previous estimates. We conclude that continuous respiratory monitoring is optimal for the safe administration of PCA, because any RD event can progress to respiratory arrest if undetected. Better alarm algorithms must be implemented to reduce the frequent alarms triggered by threshold criteria for RD.