Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to percutaneous and trans-jugular approaches for hepatic tissue acquisition. It has shown superior diagnostic yield for the targeted approach of focal lesions, less sampling variability, improved patient comfort, and safety profile. These advantages have contributed to the increased use of EUS-LB as a technique for obtaining liver tissue. In this review, we provide an update on the recent evidence of EUS-LB for the evaluation of liver disease.

Factors Associated With Inpatient Endoscopy Delay and its Impact on Hospital Length-of-Stay and 30-Day Readmission.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Inpatient endoscopy delay (IED) negatively impacts the delivery of high-quality care. We aimed to identify factors associated with IED and evaluate its effect on hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and readmission. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all inpatient endoscopies performed between November 2017 and November 2019 at a tertiary care center. IED was defined as the number of days elapsed between anticipated versus actual procedure day. Data were extracted from the endoscopy documentation software and via electronic chart review. Multivariate logistic regressions were modeled to determine variables associated with IED and hospital readmission. RESULTS: A total of 4239 inpatients (mean age, 58.3 years; 50.3% women) underwent endoscopic procedures during the study period of which 819 patients (19.3%) experienced a delay. IED resulted in a median prolonged LOS of 2 days (interquartile range, 1-2 days). Patients with IED were less likely to have an etiology identified on endoscopy (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.86; P < .001). The 2 most common causes for delays were poor bowel preparation (n = 218; 27%) and lack of endoscopy personnel/unit availability (n = 197; 24.4%). Independent predictors of IED included: older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P = .03), female sex (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40; P = .02), use of antithrombotics (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.57; P = .006), opioids (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.44; P = .012), being on contact isolation (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.75; P = .008), and colonoscopy (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.27-1.77; P < .001). Conversely, inpatients admitted to a dedicated GI medicine service were less likely to have IED (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96; P = .02). IED was the only independent predictor of 30-day readmission (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02-1.47; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: IED occurred frequently, unfavorably prolonged LOS, and was an independent risk factor for 30-day readmission. We provide a comprehensive analysis of actionable variables associated with IED that can be targeted to improve inpatient endoscopy delivery.

Effect of referral pattern and histopathology grade on surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The incidence of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps is rising. The aims of this study were to evaluate referral patterns to surgery for nonmalignant polyps, to compare outcomes between surgery and endoscopic resection (ER), and to identify factors associated with surgery in a university-based, tertiary care center. METHODS: Patients referred to colorectal surgery (CRS) for nonmalignant colorectal polyps between 2014 and 2019 were selected from the institution's integrated data repository. Clinical characteristics were obtained through chart review. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with surgery for nonmalignant polyps. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty-four patients with colorectal lesions were referred to CRS, of which 315 were for nonmalignant polyps. Most referrals (69%) came from gastroenterologists. Of the 315 cases, 136 underwent surgery and 117 were referred for attempt at ER. Complete ER was achieved in 87.2% (n = 102), with polyp recurrence in 27.2% at a median of 14 months (range, 0-72). When compared with surgery, ER was associated with a lower hospitalization rate (22.2% vs 95.6%; P < .0001), shorter hospital stay (mean, .5 ± .9 vs 2.23 ± 1 days; P < .0001), and fewer adverse events (5.9% vs 22.8%; P = .0002). Intramucosal adenocarcinoma on baseline pathology (odds ratio, 5.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-28.2) and referrals by academic gastroenterologists (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-5.72) were associated with a higher likelihood of surgery on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterologists commonly refer nonmalignant colorectal polyps to surgery, even though ER is effective and associated with lower morbidity. Both referrals from academic gastroenterologists and baseline pathology of intramucosal adenocarcinoma were factors associated with surgery. All colorectal polyps should be evaluated in a multidisciplinary approach to identify lesions suitable for ER before embarking in surgery.