RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Nonpharmacological strategies are increasingly used in pediatric procedures, but in pediatric MRI, sedation and general anesthesia are still commonly required. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing MRI, and to investigate effects on scan time, image quality, and anxiety. DATA SOURCES: We searched Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception through October 10, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs comparing the effect of a nonpharmacological intervention with standard care on use of sedation or general anesthesia, scan time, image quality, or child and parental anxiety among infants (<2 years), children, and adolescents (2-18 years) undergoing MRI. DATA EXTRACTION: Standardized instruments were used to extract data and assess study quality. RESULTS: Forty-six studies were eligible for the systematic review. Limited to studies on children and adolescents, the meta-analysis included 20 studies with 33 873 patients. Intervention versus comparator analysis showed that nonpharmacological interventions were associated with reduced need for sedation and general anesthesia in the randomized control trials (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.95; l2 = 35%) and nonrandomized studies (risk ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.66; l2 = 91%). The effect was largest among children aged 3 to 10 years when compared with older children and adolescents aged 11 to 18 years. LIMITATIONS: There was substantial heterogeneity among nonrandomized studies. CONCLUSIONS: Nonpharmacological interventions must be considered as standard procedure in infants, children, and adolescents undergoing MRI.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging is frequently used in paediatrics and requires the child/adolescent to remain still for 45 min or more. The long and narrow scanner gantry makes loud noises and may cause anxiety. To complete the procedure, children and adolescents are often sedated or receive general anaesthesia. Our primary aim is to determine whether nonpharmacological interventions designed to mentally prepare, support or distract children, and adolescents are effective in reducing the need for sedation and general anaesthesia. METHODS: We will conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis by searching the following electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and CENTRAL, as well as databases for ongoing trials. Eligibility criteria are based on the participants, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICO) framework. We will include intervention studies with comparator group(s) with no restriction on date. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts, and three reviewers will assess the full texts of potentially relevant studies. Data will be extracted, and the methodological quality will be assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools. If the data allow, we will perform a meta-analysis using a random effects model on the primary outcome, sedation/general anaesthesia. A narrative synthesis will supplement the statistical analysis. Quality of evidence for the primary outcome will be assessed using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE) approach. DISCUSSION: Our findings will provide directions for future research and may guide clinicians in terms of which type(s) of intervention(s) to implement to reduce the use of sedation/general anaesthesia during paediatric magnetic resonance imaging.
