Phenotypic characterization of cell culture-derived hepatitis E virus subjected to different chemical treatments: Application in virus removal via nanofiltration.

Safety evaluation for the hepatitis E virus (HEV) is required for plasma fractionation products. Plasma-derived HEV (pHEV) is quite unique in that it is associated with a lipid membrane, which, when stripped during manufacturing processes, induces morphological changes in the virus, making it difficult to select proper HEV phenotypes for clearance studies. We developed a convenient system for the preparation of a high titer cell culture-derived HEV (cHEV). In this system, PLC/PRF/5 cells transfected with the wild-type HEV genome generated lipid membrane-associated cHEV for a long period even after cryopreservation. We also examined how this lipid membrane-associated cHEV can be used to verify the robustness of pHEV removal via 19-nm nanofiltration. Sodium-deoxycholate and trypsin (NaDOC/T) treatment not only dissolved lipid but also digested membrane-associated proteins from pHEV and cHEV, making the resulting cHEV particle smaller in size than any pHEV phenotypes generated by ethanol or solvent-detergent treatment in this study. In both 19-nm and 35-nm nanofiltration, cHEV behaved identically to pHEV. These results indicate that cHEV is a useful resource for viral clearance studies in term of availability, and the use of NaDOC/T-treated cHEV ensured robust pHEV removal capacity via 19-nm nanofiltration.

Implementation of a 20-nm pore-size filter in the plasma-derived factor VIII manufacturing process.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Virus inactivation and removal are important prerequisites to ensure the safety of plasma derivatives. For virus inactivation and removal in our coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) product, CROSS EIGHT M, the production process consists of solvent-detergent (S/D) treatment, two chromatography steps and virus filtration with a 35-nm pore-size filter. However, the clearance of non-enveloped viruses was not as good as that of enveloped viruses because non-enveloped viruses are resistant to S/D treatment and are too small to be removed by the filter. In this study, in order to improve the viral safety of the FVIII products, we attempted to replace the 35-nm pore-size virus filter with a 20-nm filter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The virus-filtration process was validated for the removal of enveloped and non-enveloped model viruses. Several factors that might affect the FVIII yield on filtration were investigated to obtain a higher recovery. The biochemical properties of the FVIII products produced with the 20-nm pore-size filter were compared with those produced by the 35-nm filter. RESULTS: Virus filters of 20-nm pore size effectively removed the small non-enveloped viruses when compared with the 35-nm pore-size virus filter. The permeability of FVIII through the 20-nm pore-size filter was inversely proportional to the concentration of FVIII at filtration, and directly proportional to the amount of postfiltration solution. No differences were observed in the biochemical properties of both FVIII products, such as the structure and stability of the FVIII, the contents and multimeric structure of von Willebrand factor (vWF), and FVIII activation by thrombin. CONCLUSIONS: The virus-clearance efficiency of the FVIII product, CROSS EIGHT M, was markedly increased, in particular against small non-enveloped viruses, by changing the virus filter pore size from 35 nm to 20 nm. It was possible to implement the 20-nm pore-size filter without variation of the biochemical properties or a serious loss of FVIII.