RESUMEN
The Rives-Stoppa (RS) procedure is a gold standard treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias. Comparability of pain control and outcomes to the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal prosthetic (eTEP) repair remain unclear. A single-centre retrospective surgical cohort was selected including 30 RS repairs (January 2019-November 2021) and 30 consecutive eTEP procedures (September 2021-August 2022) for midline abdominal wall hernia(s) with rectus abdominis diastasis. Postoperative pain and outcomes were compared up to 1 month. Presence and median duration of patient-controlled analgesia were, respectively, 90% and 3 nights with RS, versus 30% and 0 nights with eTEP. Median switch to only oral analgesics occurred at postoperative day (POD) 3 after RS and at POD 2 after eTEP. Postoperative analgesics and opioid prescription at discharge were comparable. Median length of hospital stay was six nights after RS versus 3 nights after eTEP. Median duration of surgery was 110.5 and 164.5 min for RS and eTEP, respectively. After RS, 30 patients had postoperative drain(s) compared to 3 patients after eTEP. Conversion was needed in 3 eTEP procedures. Postoperative complications were comparable. No early recurrences were observed. Minimal residual diastasis was seen at postoperative consultation in 11 patients after eTEP. Compared to RS, eTEP is a minimally invasive alternative treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias with rectus abdominis diastasis and is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain and a comparable risk of short-term complications. At 1 month after eTEP, minimal residual diastasis can be present. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05446675. Secondary identifying number: EC/EH/220608-SK. Date of Registration: June 24, 2022.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) masquerading as a recurrent inguinal hernia is rare. We report the case of a 73-year-old male patient who presented with a symptomatic bulge in his left groin. Medical history revealed bilateral preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, osteoporosis and atrial fibrillation. The patient's further history was not significant. METHODS: Sonography revealed recurrence of an indirect inguinal hernia (4.5 cm × 2.3 cm) on the left, with bilateral subcutaneous lymph nodes that were deemed unremarkable. We planned an elective left-sided anterior inguinal repair. Apixaban was stopped two days prior to surgery. RESULTS: During surgery we identified the bulge as a lump attached to the spermatic cord. No hernial sac was present. Together with the consulting urologist, we concluded a possible malignant etiology and performed an orchiectomy along with resection of the lump. CONCLUSION: Microscopic and immunohistochemical analysis revealed a DLBCL with non-germinal center phenotype and c-MYC rearrangement. Further staging confirmed stage IE disease with extranodal paratesticular involvement. The patient was subsequently treated with rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone and showed complete metabolic remission after two cycles. This case illustrates the broad differential diagnosis of inguinal swelling and (para)testicular tumors.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Neoplasias Testiculares , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Hernia Inguinal/diagnóstico , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Ciclofosfamida , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patologíaRESUMEN
Gastric remnant necrosis is a very rare, but potential life-threatening complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). We report a case of gastric remnant necrosis that was complicated by peritonitis and resulted in septic shock in a 49-year-old woman who had undergone a LRYGB three months prior to admission. An emergent laparoscopy with subtotal gastrectomy was performed. The patient was treated for septic shock and could leave the hospital in a good condition. Potential etiological factors for gastric remnant necrosis were elaborated.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Muñón Gástrico , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Choque Séptico , Gastropatías , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Muñón Gástrico/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Choque Séptico/cirugía , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Gastropatías/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A left paraduodenal hernia is a rare clinical condition, resulting from embryological abnormalities or anomalies of the peritoneal attachments. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult because of its nonspecific clinical manifestations. PRESENTATION OF A CASE: A 42-year-old man, with negative surgical history, presented to the emergency department with complaints of severe acute epigastric pain and vomiting of 12 h duration. The patient did not report any episodes of abdominal pain in his history. Computed tomography imaging was suggestive for a closed-loop obstruction. An emergency laparoscopy was performed, revealing a pathologically dilated tangle of jejunal loops and an incidental finding of a left paraduodenal hernia, the latter containing small bowel loops with normal caliber. The small bowel loops were reduced, and the hernia orifice was closed via non-absorbable sutures to restore normal anatomy. The pathologically dilated small bowel segment with serosal scar tissue, probably developed secondary to a previous episode of incarceration, was resected. RESULTS: A high level of clinical suspicion for a left paraduodenal hernia is advocated in patients with a virgin abdomen, presenting with recurrent vague abdominal pain or acute symptoms of small bowel obstruction. Usually, a left paraduodenal hernia is an incidental finding on computed tomography imaging or during diagnostic laparoscopy. Surgical repair is the mainstay therapy, even in asymptomatic cases, to prevent future small bowel incarceration which develops in almost half of the cases. The laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe, also in an emergency setting. CONCLUSIONS: By presenting this case, we assume to raise awareness as many clinicians are unfamiliar with this rare condition. Clinical suspicion and detailed knowledge of the etiology, anatomy, and vascular landmarks allow surgeons to accurately manage a left paraduodenal hernia.