Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 46(3): 602-613, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570475

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Key performance indicators (KPIs) are quantifiable measures used to monitor the quality of health services. Implementation guidelines for clinical pharmacy services (CPS) do not specify KPIs. AIM: To assess the quality of the studies that have developed KPIs for CPS in inpatient hospital settings. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted by searching in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, supplemented with citation analyses and grey literature searches, to retrieve studies addressing the development of KPIs in CPS for hospital inpatients. Exclusions comprised drug- or disease-specific studies and those not written in English, French, Portuguese, or Spanish. The Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument assessed methodological quality. Domain scores and an overall score were calculated using an equal-weight principle. KPIs were classified into structure, process, and outcome categories. The protocol is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KS2G3 . RESULTS: We included thirteen studies that collectively developed 225 KPIs. Merely five studies scored over 50% on the AIRE instrument, with domains #3 (scientific evidence) and #4 (formulation and usage) displaying low scores. Among the KPIs, 8.4% were classified as structure, 85.8% as process, and 5.8% as outcome indicators. The overall methodological quality did not exhibit a clear association with a major focus on outcomes. None of the studies provided benchmarking reference values. CONCLUSION: The KPIs formulated for evaluating CPS in hospital settings primarily comprised process measures, predominantly suggested by pharmacists, with inadequate evidence support, lacked piloting or validation, and consequently, were devoid of benchmarking reference values.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/normas , Humanos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas
2.
Ciênc. Saúde Colet. (Impr.) ; 27(8): 3239-3247, ago. 2022. tab, graf
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1384491

RESUMEN

Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é descrever a distribuição de Centros Transplantadores (CTs) e transplantes de células-tronco hematopoiéticas (TCTH) no território brasileiro. Estudo descritivo, que reúne informações sobre a distribuição CTs e o número de procedimentos realizados entre 2001 e 2020, a partir das fontes dos dados: Sociedade Brasileira de Terapia celular e Transplantes de Medula Óssea (SBTMO); Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO); Sistema de Informações Hospitalares do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIH/SUS); e Ministério da Saúde (MS). Foram identificados 86 CTs, com predominância na região Sudeste do país (64%). A região Norte não possui CTs. No período contabilizaram-se mais de 30 mil procedimentos, concentrados nas regiões Sudeste e Sul. O TCTH do tipo alogênico foi prevalente. Constataram-se divergências entre os números de transplantes realizados a depender da fonte consultada. Apesar do crescimento do número de procedimentos no período do estudo, tanto a distribuição de CTs quanto o número de TCTHs se concentrou em regiões mais desenvolvidas. Essa heterogeneidade pode ter propiciado iniquidades no acesso ao tratamento pela população.


Abstract The scope of this article is to describe the distribution of Transplant Centers (TCs) and hematopoietic stem-cell transplants (HSCTs) in the Brazilian territory. It is a descriptive study, which brings together information on the distribution of TCs and the number of procedures performed between 2001 and 2020, based on the following data sources: the Brazilian Cell Therapy and Bone Marrow Transplant Society of (SBTMO); the Brazilian Organ Transplant Association (ABTO); the Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System (SIH/SUS); and the Ministry of Health (MS). A total of 86 TCs were identified, predominantly in the Southeastern region of the country (64%). There are no TCs in the Northern region. Throughout the period, there were more than 30,000 procedures, concentrated in the Southeastern and Southern regions. The allogeneic type of HSCT was prevalent. Differences were found between the numbers of transplants performed depending on the source consulted. Despite the increase in the number of procedures during the period studied, both the distribution of TCs and the number of HSCTs were concentrated in more developed regions. This heterogeneity may have led to inequities in the access of the population to treatment.

3.
Cien Saude Colet ; 27(8): 3239-3247, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35894334

RESUMEN

The scope of this article is to describe the distribution of Transplant Centers (TCs) and hematopoietic stem-cell transplants (HSCTs) in the Brazilian territory. It is a descriptive study, which brings together information on the distribution of TCs and the number of procedures performed between 2001 and 2020, based on the following data sources: the Brazilian Cell Therapy and Bone Marrow Transplant Society of (SBTMO); the Brazilian Organ Transplant Association (ABTO); the Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System (SIH/SUS); and the Ministry of Health (MS). A total of 86 TCs were identified, predominantly in the Southeastern region of the country (64%). There are no TCs in the Northern region. Throughout the period, there were more than 30,000 procedures, concentrated in the Southeastern and Southern regions. The allogeneic type of HSCT was prevalent. Differences were found between the numbers of transplants performed depending on the source consulted. Despite the increase in the number of procedures during the period studied, both the distribution of TCs and the number of HSCTs were concentrated in more developed regions. This heterogeneity may have led to inequities in the access of the population to treatment.


O objetivo deste artigo é descrever a distribuição de Centros Transplantadores (CTs) e transplantes de células-tronco hematopoiéticas (TCTH) no território brasileiro. Estudo descritivo, que reúne informações sobre a distribuição CTs e o número de procedimentos realizados entre 2001 e 2020, a partir das fontes dos dados: Sociedade Brasileira de Terapia celular e Transplantes de Medula Óssea (SBTMO); Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO); Sistema de Informações Hospitalares do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIH/SUS); e Ministério da Saúde (MS). Foram identificados 86 CTs, com predominância na região Sudeste do país (64%). A região Norte não possui CTs. No período contabilizaram-se mais de 30 mil procedimentos, concentrados nas regiões Sudeste e Sul. O TCTH do tipo alogênico foi prevalente. Constataram-se divergências entre os números de transplantes realizados a depender da fonte consultada. Apesar do crescimento do número de procedimentos no período do estudo, tanto a distribuição de CTs quanto o número de TCTHs se concentrou em regiões mais desenvolvidas. Essa heterogeneidade pode ter propiciado iniquidades no acesso ao tratamento pela população.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Brasil , Humanos
4.
Epidemiol Serv Saude ; 29(1): e2018512, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32267298

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: to describe the distribution of solid organ transplants in Brazil, as well as information about the waiting list (demand) and origin of transplant patients by organ type and Federative Unit, from 2001 to 2017. METHODS: this was a descriptive study using data from State Transplantation Centers, the Brazilian Organ Transplant Association, and the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS). RESULTS: 153 transplant units were identified in 2017, with only 11.8% located in the Northern and Midwest regions; within the study period, 99,805 transplants were performed, ranging from 3,520 (2001) to 8,669 (2017); the highest number of transplants was concentrated in the Southern and Southeastern regions. CONCLUSION: there are inequalities in transplantation access, possibly due to lack of uniformity in service distribution.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Listas de Espera , Brasil , Sistemas de Información en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos
5.
Epidemiol. serv. saúde ; 29(1): e2018512, 2020. tab, graf, mapa
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: biblio-1090255

RESUMEN

Objetivo: descrever a distribuição dos transplantes de órgãos sólidos no Brasil, bem como informações da lista de espera (demanda) e origem dos pacientes transplantados, por tipo de órgão e Unidade da Federação, de 2001 a 2017. Métodos: estudo descritivo, com dados das Centrais Estaduais de Transplantes, da Associação Brasileira de Transplantes de Órgãos e do Sistema de Informações Hospitalares do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIH/SUS). Resultados: 153 centros de transplante foram identificados em 2017, apenas 11,8% deles localizados nas regiões Norte e Centro-Oeste; no período em estudo, foram realizados 99.805 transplantes, variando de 3.520 (2001) a 8.669 (2017); as regiões Sul e Sudeste concentraram o maior número de transplantes. Conclusão: existem desigualdades regionais na realização dos transplantes, possivelmente por não haver uniformidade na distribuição dos serviços.


Objetivo: describir la distribución de los trasplantes de órganos sólidos en Brasil, así como informaciones de la lista de espera (demanda) y origen de los pacientes trasplantados por tipo de órgano y unidad federativa, entre 2001 y 2017. Métodos: estudio descriptivo usando datos extraídos de Centrales Estatales de Trasplantes, Asociación Brasileña de Trasplantes de Órganos y Sistema de Informaciones Hospitalarias del Sistema Único Nacional de Salud (SIH/SUS). Resultados: 153 centros de trasplante identificados en 2017, solamente 11,8% están ubicados en las regiones Norte y Centro-Oeste; se realizaron 99.805 trasplantes, desde 3.520 (2001) hasta 8.669 (2017); Sur y Sudeste concentran el mayor número de trasplantes. Conclusión: hay desigualdad en el acceso a los trasplantes, posiblemente debido a la falta de uniformidad en la distribución de los servicios.


Objective: to describe the distribution of solid organ transplants in Brazil, as well as information about the waiting list (demand) and origin of transplant patients by organ type and Federative Unit, from 2001 to 2017. Methods: this was a descriptive study using data from State Transplantation Centers, the Brazilian Organ Transplant Association, and the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS). Results: 153 transplant units were identified in 2017, with only 11.8% located in the Northern and Midwest regions; within the study period, 99,805 transplants were performed, ranging from 3,520 (2001) to 8,669 (2017); the highest number of transplants was concentrated in the Southern and Southeastern regions. Conclusion: there are inequalities in transplantation access, possibly due to lack of uniformity in service distribution.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Trasplante de Órganos/tendencias , Trasplante de Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Espacio-Temporal , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Factores Socioeconómicos , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Corazón/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Páncreas/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 34(2): 290-4, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22382886

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) have been implemented to promote rational use of antimicrobial drugs. Multidisciplinary teams are needed to form effective committees. OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of ASP, with and without the presence of a pharmacist, in a cardiology hospital in Brazil. METHODS: The program started with an infectious disease (ID) physician, and after 22 months, a pharmacist started to work in the ASP team. We present data related to: stage 1-before the program implementation; stage 2-with the ID physician; and stage 3 with the inclusion of a pharmacist. Analysis was made by segmented regression of time series. RESULTS: After the start of ASP there was a significant reduction of consumption of all antimicrobials. The pharmacist contributed to the significant reduction in consumption of fluoroquinolones, clindamycin and ampicillin/sulbactam and in increase in total cephalosporins use in stage 3. Adherence rate to the ASP team recommendations was 64.1%. There was a significant reduction of 69% in hospital antibiotics costs. CONCLUSION: A non-expensive ASP in a limited resource country resulted in reductions in antimicrobial consumption and costs. The multidisciplinary team contributed to maximize the impact of interventions.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Brasil , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Países en Desarrollo , Costos de los Medicamentos , Utilización de Medicamentos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Adhesión a Directriz , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Objetivos Organizacionales , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Farmacéuticos/economía , Farmacéuticos/normas , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-552744

RESUMEN

Introdução: As interações fármaco-alimento (IFA) são definidas como alterações produzidas nos efeitos terapêuticos de um medicamento em razão da ingestão concomitante de alimento. Objetivo: Identificar prescrições médicas com possíveis IFA dos pacientes internados no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) e orientar o corpo clínico quanto aos horários adequados de administração dos medicamentos. Métodos: O estudo analisou, entre fevereiro e julho de 2006, 2.645 prescrições de pacientes adultos internados nas unidades clínicas e cirúrgicas do HCPA e que recebiam dieta oral. Resultados: Observou-se que 54,5% (1.442) das prescrições apresentavam potenciais IFA. Nesses casos, as equipes assistenciais recebiam, através de notificação em prontuário médico, informações sobre os medicamentos que necessitavam de intervalo de jejum para garantir sua máxima biodisponibilidade. Conclusão: A alta incidência de prescrições contendo medicamentos possíveis de interagir com os alimentos demonstra a necessidade de um sistema que disponibilize, sistematicamente, as orientações relacionadas à correta administração dos medicamentos.


Background: Drug-food interactions (DFI) are defined as alterations produced in the therapeutic effects of a drug due to concomitant food ingestion. Objective: To identify medical prescriptions with possible DFI in patients hospitalized at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) and to provide guidance to the clinical staff about the appropriate time for drug administration. Methods: Between February and July 2006, we analyzed 2,645 prescriptions of adult inpatients receiving oral diet. Results: We found that 54.5% (1,442) of the prescriptions had potential DFI. In such cases, the medical staff was receiving information about the drugs that needed a fasting interval to ensure maximum bioavailability by means of notifications in medical records. Conclusions: The high incidence of prescriptions with possible DFI shows the need for a system that provides systematic guidance regarding the adequate administration of drugs.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Dietoterapia/métodos , Dietoterapia/normas , Dietoterapia , Interacciones Alimento-Droga , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Farmacoepidemiología/normas , Farmacoepidemiología/tendencias , Servicios Farmacéuticos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA