[Sustainability in intensive and emergency care : A nationwide survey by the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine]. / Nachhaltigkeit in der Intensiv- und Notfallversorgung : Eine bundesweite Umfrage von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin.

BACKGROUND: The impact of climate change on humans is well known. However, the health care system is also a relevant contributor, accounting for up to 5-7% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and work should be adapted to be more sustainable. AIM: The survey investigated whether sustainability plays a role in hospitals and specifically in the field of emergency and intensive care. Concrete measures and which hurdles are already recognized were also inquired. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The "AG Nachhaltigkeit" (working group on sustainability) of the "Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin" (DGIIN) conducted an electronic survey among the staff of intensive care units, emergency rooms, and ambulance services in Germany. RESULTS: In all, 218 survey results were included in the analysis: 108 (50%) participants were from the nursing sector and 98 (45%) belonged to the medical staff. The majority of participants work in an intensive care unit (181 [83%]) followed by intermediate care unit (52 [24%]). A total of 104 (47%) participants indicated that their workplace had already implemented sustainability measures. However, when asked whether decision-makers in the workplaces incorporate sustainability into their decisions, management scored highest with only 20%. Potential for improvement is seen in energy and waste management, among others. CONCLUSION: The survey results show that (1) employees are highly motivated to address the issue of sustainability and to implement measures, (2) the potential to establish a resource-saving and environmentally friendly hospital is far from being exhausted, and (3) it must become a priority that decision-makers in the hospital propagate sustainability, make processes transparent, and support the motivation of employees on the subject of sustainability. In addition, this process must be supported by politicians and health insurance companies.

The relationship of a Prothrombin G20210A mutation or a factor V Leiden mutation and on-aspirin platelet (re-)activity.

INTRODUCTION: The interplay between platelets and pro-thrombotic factors may have been under-investigated in the identification of aspirin users at high risk for cardiovascular event reoccurrences. There is growing evidence that a Prothrombin G20210A (FII) or a Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation might increase platelet activity. Subsequently, this study assessed on-aspirin platelet (re-)activity in non-pregnant participants with a FII - or a FVL mutation in comparison with non-pregnant data derived from controls. METHODS: This study was conducted with data derived from the follow-up FRUIT-RCT. This is a unique cohort namely, participants without a history of cardiovascular disease or thrombotic events, but who are a carrier of a pro-thrombotic mutation. All participants were instructed to ingest aspirin once daily for 10 days. Platelet (re-)activity was measured by the PFA Closure Time (PFA-CT), the VerifyNow (VN-ARU), and serum Thromboxane B2 (sTxB2) levels. RESULTS: In total, eight participants with a FII-, 15 with a FVL mutation, and 21 controls were included. The FII mutation carriers demonstrated significantly higher on-aspirin platelet (re)-activity (PFA-CT, -92 sec.; VN-ARU, +37 ARU) vs. controls. The FVL carriers demonstrated similar on-aspirin platelet (re-)activity vs. controls. The sTxB 2 levels were similar in either of the carrier groups vs. controls. CONCLUSION: We feel these data are suggestive of increased on-aspirin platelet (re-)activity, as measured by the PFA-200 and the VerifyNow, in non-pregnant carriers of a FII-mutation, but not in carriers of FVL-mutation. Interestingly, this increased on-aspirin platelet (re-)activity is present in spite of low sTxB2 levels.

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency following acute pancreatitis: Systematic review and study level meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study systematically explores the prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) after acute pancreatitis in different subgroups of etiology (biliary/alcoholic/other), disease severity and follow-up time (<12, 12-36 and > 36 months after index admission). METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched, 32 studies were included in this study level meta-analysis. RESULTS: In a total of 1495 patients with acute pancreatitis, tested at a mean of 36 months after index admission, the pooled prevalence of PEI was 27.1% (95%-confidence interval [CI]: 20.3%-35.1%). Patients from seven studies (n = 194) underwent direct tests with pooled prevalence of 41.7% [18.5%-69.2%]. Patients from 26 studies (n = 1305) underwent indirect tests with pooled prevalence of 24.4% [18.3%-31.8%]. In subgroup analyses on patients that underwent fecal elastase-1 tests, PEI occurred more often in alcoholic pancreatitis (22.7% [16.6%-30.1%]) than in biliary pancreatitis (10.2% [6.2%-16.4%]) or other etiology (13.4% [7.7%-22.4%]; P = 0.02). Pooled prevalence of PEI after mild and severe pancreatitis was 19.4% [8.6%-38.2%] and 33.4% [22.6%-46.3%] respectively in studies using fecal elaste-1 tests (P = 0.049). Similar results were seen in patients without (18.9% [9.3%-34.6%]) and with necrotizing pancreatitis (32.0% [18.2%-49.8%]; P = 0.053). Over time, the prevalence of PEI decreased in patients who underwent the fecal elastase-1 test and increased in patients who underwent the fecal fat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After acute pancreatitis, a quarter of all patients develop PEI during follow-up. Alcoholic etiology and severe and necrotizing pancreatitis are associated with higher risk of PEI. The prevalence of PEI may change as time of follow-up increases.

Pharmacotherapeutical strategies in the prevention of acute, vaso-occlusive pain in sickle cell disease: a systematic review.

Sickle-cell disease (SCD) is characterized by frequent and painful vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). Various treatments have been evaluated over the years. However, a clear overview is lacking. The objective of this study was to systematically review all pharmacotherapeutical strategies in the prevention of VOCs beyond hydroxyurea. We performed a systematic literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL). Eligible studies were controlled clinical trials evaluating pharmacotherapeutical interventions targeting the reduction of VOCs in patients with SCD. Primary outcomes were the number or duration of SCD-related pain days, VOCs, or hospital admissions for VOCs. Secondary outcomes included time to first VOC or hospital admission for a VOC. A standardized data extraction sheet was used. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool. A total of 36 studies were included in this review, covering 26 different prophylactic interventions. The most promising interventions for reducing the frequency of either VOCs or hospitalizations were the oral antioxidants l-glutamine and ω-3 fatty acids and the IV antiadhesive agent crizanlizumab. Twenty-three studies did not show any beneficial effect of the intervention under investigation, and 6 studies were either too small or methodologically inadequate to draw conclusions. Because of the heterogeneity of interventions, no meta-analysis was performed. In conclusion, this review identified 3 promising pharmacotherapeutical strategies in the prevention of VOCs in SCD. Importantly, this study highlights the discrepancy between the significant burden of SCD worldwide and the low number of adequate trials performed. This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42015025250).