Diagnostic imaging and CEUS findings in a rare case of Desmoid-type fibromatosis. A case report.

Desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), also known as aggressive fibromatosis, is a locally aggressive benign fibroblastic neoplasm that can infiltrate or recur but cannot metastasize. It is rare, with an estimated annual incidence of two to four new cases per million people. Most DFs occur sporadically, but it may also be associated with the hereditary syndrome familial adenomatous polyposis. Treatment is necessary when the disease is symptomatic, especially in case of compression of critical structures. When possible, surgical resection is the treatment of choice; however, recurrence is common. Due to the high rate of recurrence, imaging plays an important role not only in diagnosis, but also in the management of DF. Although there are a number of studies describing CT and MRI findings of DF, there is no description of contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings.

Target Volume Delineation Based on Diffusion-weighted magnetic Resonance Imaging for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.

AIM: To compare gross tumor volume (GTV) definition in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with LAHNSCC were imaged with CT and DW-MRI before treatment. GTV was delineated in both CT and DW-MRI images by two investigators. CT and MRI images were co-registered and volume data were extracted for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In general, DW-MRI volumes [based on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] were smaller than CT-based volumes. For all patients, GTV delineation based on pre-treatment DW-MRI was significantly smaller than that based on CT scan (CT-GTV) (p=0.0078). The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between the two investigators was -0.37 cm(3) for CT-GTV and 0.17 cm(3) for ADC-GTV measurements, respectively. CONCLUSION: DW-MRI radiotherapy GTVs are smaller than CT-based targets with less interobserver variability. Further validation of these preliminary results is necessary in a much larger patient group.

Role of color Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of renal transplantation from living donors.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the same kidney before and after transplantation to assess the ability of the allograft to restore blood flow, time required to achieve functional recovery after surgery and the possibility of differentiating normal from pathological allografts using color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) flow indices: resistive index (RI)/renal cortical ratio (RCR) and scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 79 living donors and 79 recipients. Donors underwent renal CDUS and scintigraphy. CDUS was repeated on the allograft 24 h, 3, 15 and 30 days after transplantation, and scintigraphy 3-5 days after transplantation. Recipients were divided into two groups on the basis of clinical and biochemical values: (A) well-functioning allografts and (B) acute pathology. Results of CDUS, RI and RCI were compared to results of scintigraphy, biochemical values and biopsy. RESULTS: Group (A) n = 60 (76 %), group (B) n = 19 (24 %); RI sensitivity was 93 %, specificity 83 %. In group (A) positive predictive value (PPV) was 94 % and in group (B) 90 %. RCR using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded sensitivity 100 % and specificity 98.3 %. Scintigraphy mean values of glomerular filtration ratio and T max before transplantation were in group (A): 50.32 ml/min and 4.87 min; after transplantation 46.88 ml/min and 4.96 min; in group (B): 48.68 ml/min and 4.63 min, after transplantation 27.89 ml/min and 10.53 min, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficient between preoperative and postoperative results of scintigraphy was significant in group (A) (glomerular filtration ratio = 0.85, T max = 0.70) and not significant in group (B) (glomerular filtration ratio = 0.40, T max = 0.08). CONCLUSION: This study shows that CDUS, RI and RCR are useful in postoperative evaluation of transplanted kidneys as these parameters can, after only 24 h, confirm the good condition of the allograft despite still excessive blood parameter values.