Excess of weight: is it a modifiable predictive and prognostic factor in locally advanced rectal cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and rates of treatment tolerance and clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with a multimodality approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 56 patients with histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma, staged T3-4, and/or node-positive tumor, which underwent intensified radiochemotherapy (RT-CHT) treatment before surgery. We calculated adiposity indices and analyzed their influence on treatment tolerance and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Distribution of the 56 patients according to BMI was BMI < 25 kg/m2 (n = 19; 33.9%), BMI 25-29 kg/m2 (n = 29; 51.8%) and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (n = 8; 14.3%). BMI had no significant influence on neo-adjuvant treatment-related toxicity. With a median follow-up of 23 months (range 11-47), the 2-year survival was 85.7%. We did not observe any significant difference among the three BMI categories for any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested no evident links between overweight and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with neo-adjuvant RT-CHT. Overweight patients tolerate treatment as normal-weight patients.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To analyze diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for treatment response assessment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma, stage II-III disease, were enrolled and underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). All patients were referred for a DW-MRI protocol on a 3 Tesla MR-system, consisting of axial T2-weighted and DWI sequences prior (I), during (II) and after (III) nCRT. Corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated. RESULTS: Between February 2011 and June 2015, 37 patients participated in the study. All patients completed programmed treatment. Overall, 11 patients (29.7%) had pathologic complete response (pCR). No correlation between the mean pre- (ADC-I), during (ADC-II), post- (ADC-III) ADC and the reduction in tumor size after nCRT was recorded. No substantial difference in the ADC distribution was found between pCR and no-pCR patients. The ADC-II level significantly increased in the pCR cases (T = 1.675; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ADC value could be useful for discriminating between the pCR patients and the no-pCR patients. Further studies are necessary to identify the optimal MRI parameters combination to predict tumor response to nCRT. It is hoped that these data will provide the basis for a more solid scientific evidence.