Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1347317, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695021

RESUMEN

Introduction: Efforts to improve medication access in low-and middle-income countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, have made progress, especially in the fight against infectious diseases such as tuberculosis. However, challenges exist in establishing effective pharmacovigilance systems. The PhArmacoVIgilance Africa (PAVIA) project was committed to enhancing pharmacovigilance in Tanzania, Eswatini, Nigeria, and Ethiopia, with an emphasis on anti-tuberculosis drugs, utilizing various methods, including training. This study evaluates the PAVIA training program's effectiveness and its adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A blended e-learning program, incorporating two courses and a platform for educational materials, was developed. This program, designed to train healthcare professionals in pharmacovigilance, was incorporated into a Training of Trainers model. To evaluate the program effectiveness, we used multiple measures such as assessing knowledge gain through pre-and post-test scores, assessing learners' satisfaction and attitudes via questionnaires, and analyzing Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) in VigiBase to determine the impact on spontaneous reporting systems in the PAVIA countries. Results: 121 learners enrolled in the pilot trainings, including 36 from Tanzania, 34 from Eswatini, 25 from Nigeria, and 26 from Ethiopia. Notably, post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores in all four countries. Following the pilot trainings, multiple step-down training sessions were held in Tanzania, Eswatini, and Nigeria, with a total of 827 learners registering and 421 successfully completing the program. Learners' scores on the post-tests were significantly higher than on the pre-tests for both courses in all three countries. Learners' feedback on the training was overwhelmingly positive. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of ICSRs revealed a substantial increase in reports after the training in Tanzania, Eswatini, and Nigeria. Discussion: An innovative e-learning program trained healthcare professionals in pharmacovigilance and anti-tuberculosis drug safety over 3 years in four PAVIA countries. The program effectively improved participants' knowledge, received positive feedback, and likely had an impact on reporting rates in Tanzania, Eswatini, and Nigeria, although a direct causal link could not be definitively established due to data limitations and other factors, such as the heightened reporting rates associated with COVID-19 vaccines, that could have contributed to the notable increase in ICSRs.

3.
Front Pharmacol ; 11: 622862, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33536925

RESUMEN

Background: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are an important cause of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In literature most of studies focus only on potential DDIs, while detailed data on serious ADRs associated with DDIs are limited. Our aim is to identify and characterize serious ADRs caused by DDIs using a spontaneous reporting database. Methods: All serious ADR reports, not related to vaccines and with a "definite", "probable" or "possible" causality assessment, inserted into the National Pharmacovigilance database from Veneto Region (January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020) were analyzed. A list of drug pairs was created by selecting the reports containing at least two suspected or concomitant drugs. We verified which drug pairs potentially interacted according to the online version of DRUGDEX® system. For each potential DDI we controlled whether the ADR description in the report corresponded to the interaction effect as described in Micromedex. A detailed characterization of all serious reports containing an occurring DDI was performed. Results: In the study period a total of 31,604 reports of suspected ADRs from the Veneto Region were identified, of which 2,195 serious reports (6.9% of all ADR reports) containing at least two suspected or concomitant drugs were analyzed. We identified 1,208 ADR reports with at least one potential DDI (55.0% of 2,195) and 381 reports (17.4% of 2,195 reports) with an occurring ADR associated with a DDI. The median age of patients and the number of contraindicated or major DDIs were significantly higher in reports with an occurring DDI. Warfarin was the most frequently reported interacting drug and the most common ADRs were gastrointestinal or cerebral hemorrhagic events. The proton pump inhibitors/warfarin, followed by platelet aggregation inhibitors/warfarin were the drug-drug combinations most frequently involved in ADRs caused by DDIs. The highest proportion of fatal reports was observed with platelet aggregation inhibitors/warfarin and antidepressants/warfarin. Conclusion: Our findings showed that about one-third of patients exposed to a potential DDI actually experienced a serious ADR. Furthermore, our study confirms that a spontaneous reporting database could be a valuable resource for identifying and characterizing ADRs caused by DDIs and the drugs leading to serious ADRs and deaths.

5.
Drug Saf ; 41(11): 1003-1011, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29949100

RESUMEN

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can cause serious health problems, as shown in studies about drug-related hospitalizations. To build knowledge of and raise awareness about ADRs among healthcare professionals, more education in the field of ADRs and pharmacovigilance (PV) is needed. No standard exists for teaching PV at universities for medical, pharmacy, dentistry and nursing students, so a core curriculum needs to be developed to teach important aspects of PV to students. In September 2016, a stakeholders' meeting was initiated on behalf of the World Health Organization (WHO) and organized by the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. This meeting addressed and agreed on the PV competencies students need to develop and what key aspects of the subject should be taught. Five key aspects were identified: understanding the importance of PV in the context of pharmacotherapy, and preventing, recognizing, managing and reporting ADRs. Since time and resources for PV education are limited, elements of the WHO PV core curriculum for university teaching were designed to be integrated into existing courses but can be used as a stand-alone programme. The basis of and outline for the WHO PV core curriculum for university teaching are addressed in this paper. It is expected that PV competencies for students are vital for their contribution to safe use of medicines in the future. In addition, this article aims to stimulate discussion on this subject and promote collaboration between universities, national PV centres and other stakeholders to integrate key aspects of PV in their educational programmes.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/organización & administración , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/terapia , Personal de Salud/educación , Farmacovigilancia , Curriculum , Documentación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Países Bajos , Competencia Profesional , Factores de Tiempo , Organización Mundial de la Salud
6.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 15(sup2): 69-75, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27875920

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the ADR reports of drugs with a monitoring registry (MR drugs), in particular those related to abuse/misuse, medication error, overdose, which might indicate an unsafe use. We compared these reports with those of similar drugs without a registry (non-MR drugs), thus verifying whether the registries could be useful tools for a safer use of innovative drugs. METHODS: All ADR reports included in the Italian Pharmacovigilance Network database from January 1st 2013 to December 31st 2015 (vaccines and literature cases excluded) were analysed. We compared the ADR reports of MR and non-MR drugs with the same ATC class at III level. RESULTS: The percentage of ADR reports with a completed 'Section 7' was significantly lower for MR compared to non-MR drugs (2.0 versus 6.2, p < 0.001). The difference concerned in particular the ADR reports related to abuse/misuse, medication errors and overdose. These reports, more strictly related to inappropriate use, were less frequent for MR drugs in all the considered ATC classes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that monitoring registries could be a useful tool for the reduction of frequency of ADRs related to inappropriate use, besides the control of pharmaceutical budget.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Farmacovigilancia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Sobredosis de Droga/prevención & control , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta/prevención & control , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros
7.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 13 Suppl 1: S21-9, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25171156

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting by patients has a fundamental role in pharmacovigilance. The main objectives of the present study were to assess the impact of a pharmacist-based intervention in promoting direct patient reporting, to evaluate patient ability to identify and report ADRs and to determine their pattern. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study involved 96 pharmacists in the Campania region of Italy, who interviewed their customers and asked them whether they had experienced an ADR. Patients who had experienced an ADR were invited to complete an ADR reporting form. The quality of completed ADR reporting forms was evaluated before their entry into the Italian Spontaneous Reporting System (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza [RNF]) and, once entered, their pattern was determined. RESULTS: A total of 18,677 patients were interviewed, and 10.88% had experienced an ADR. After quality control, 54.32% of all reporting forms were entered into the RNF so that patient contribution to spontaneous reporting, null over the years, reached ∼7%. Patients reported mainly non-serious (91.28%) and expected (94.62%) ADRs, and NSAIDs or antibiotics were the most frequently reported drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that pharmacists can have an important role in promoting patient reporting and adds new information on how a patient reporting form should be structured.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacovigilancia , Rol Profesional , Autoinforme , Adulto Joven
8.
Drug Saf ; 36(4): 267-76, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23475583

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adding patients to the range of potential reporters of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) may increase spontaneous reporting and contribute to the detection of signals, one of the primary aims of spontaneous reporting systems. Community pharmacies could have an important role in this context as a service for promoting patient reporting of ADRs. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of the present study were to assess the potential impact of an intervention to promote patient reporting in community pharmacies in the Veneto region of Italy, and to compare the characteristics of patients' and general practitioners' (GPs) reports of ADRs. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Veneto region of Italy and involved 211 pharmacists working in 118 community pharmacies. Each pharmacist was asked to select, during the study period, about 250 customers who had received at least one drug, and then to present the spontaneous reporting form to those who had experienced a suspected ADR. Patients were asked to complete the ADR report form and either give it back to the pharmacist, or send it by fax or mail, or else to fill in the form online. RESULTS: In a 4-month period, 52,495 customers were interviewed by the pharmacists and 4,949 of them (9.4 %) referred a suspected ADR. The Pharmacovigilance Centre of the Veneto region received 2,311 citizen's ADR reporting forms related to the study (from 46.7 % of all patients interviewed who had experienced suspected ADRs). After quality control 1,794 of these reports were entered into the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database and were compared with the reports (226) sent by GPs in the Veneto region in the same period. Patients reported a higher percentage of known and non-serious reactions than did GPs. Drugs widely used in the community setting, and over-the-counter products, were the drugs most frequently reported by patients. In contrast, few reports involving reactions to antineoplastic agents or contrast media-drugs mostly used in a hospital setting-were sent by patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that patient reporting has the potential to add value to the pharmacovigilance system. The overall quality of the information provided in patients' reports was good. The differences between reports by patients and by GPs indicate different points of view that can enrich spontaneous reporting.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Farmacéuticos/psicología , Farmacovigilancia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacias , Adulto Joven
9.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 11(1): 83-94, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22022824

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) arise in numerous different ways, involving pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Adverse drug reactions are a possible consequence of DDIs and health operators are often unaware of the clinical risks of certain drug combinations. Many papers on drug interactions have been published in recent years, but most of them focused on potential DDIs while few studies have been conducted on actual interactions. AREAS COVERED: This paper reviews the epidemiology of actual DDIs in outpatients as well as in hospital settings and in spontaneous reporting databases. The incidence of actual DDIs is consistently lower than that of potential DDIs. However, the absolute number of patients involved is high, representing a significant proportion of adverse drug reactions. The importance of risk factors such as age, polypharmacy and genetic polymorphisms is also evaluated. The relevance and efficacy of tools for recognizing and preventing DDIs are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Potential DDIs far outnumber actual drug interactions. The potential for an adverse interaction to occur is often theoretical, and clinically important adverse effects occur only in the presence of specific risk factors. Several studies have shown the efficacy of computers in early detection of DDIs. However, a correct risk-benefit evaluation by the prescribing physician, together with a careful clinical, physiological and biochemical monitoring of patients, is essential. Future directions of drug interaction research include the increasing importance of pharmacogenetics in preventing DDIs and the evaluation of interactions with biological drugs.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Farmacogenética/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
10.
Drug Saf ; 33(8): 667-75, 2010 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20635825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are an important cause of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Many studies have recently considered this issue, but most of them focus only on potential interactions and are often related to the hospital setting. A spontaneous reporting database could be a valuable resource for detection of ADRs associated with DDIs; however, data in the literature are limited. OBJECTIVE: To detect those patients treated with potentially interacting drugs and the cases where reported adverse reactions are a possible consequence of DDIs, using an Italian spontaneous reporting database. METHODS: The data were obtained from a database containing all reports of suspected ADRs from five Italian regions (January 1990 to December 2007) that are the main contributors to the Italian spontaneous reporting system. All reports containing at least two drugs, reported as being suspected of causing the ADR or as concomitant medication, were selected and a list of drug pairs was drawn up. We performed a search to verify which drug pairs are considered a potential DDI, using the Internet version of the DRUGDEX(R) system. For each report containing a potential DDI, we verified whether the description of the adverse reaction corresponded to the interaction effect. RESULTS: The database contained 45 315 reports, of which 17 700 (39.1%) had at least two reported drugs. We identified 5345 (30.2%) reports with potential DDIs, and in 1159 (21.7%) of these reports a related ADR was reported. The percentage of reports with potential DDIs increased in relation to the number of concomitantly administered drugs, ranging from 9.8% for two drugs to 88.3% for eight or more drugs. The percentages of serious or fatal reports of ADRs associated with a DDI were significantly higher than other reports analysed. The mean age, percentage of male patients and the mean number of drugs were also significantly higher in reports with DDIs than in other reports. In 235 of 1159 reports (20.3%), both interacting drugs were recognized as suspect by the reporter. This percentage varies in relation to the drugs involved, ranging from 2% to about 65%. The most frequently reported interaction was digoxin and diuretics, but no fatal ADRs were reported with this combination. The combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents was responsible for the greatest number of serious reactions and deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates that spontaneous reporting, despite its limitations, can be an important resource for detecting ADRs associated with the concomitant use of interacting drugs. Moreover, our data confirm that DDIs could be a real problem in clinical practice, showing that more than one in five patients exposed to a potential DDI experienced a related ADR.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Minería de Datos/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/tendencias , Anciano , Minería de Datos/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 66(2): 199-206, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19838692

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of the present study was to collect and compare cases of drug-induced PML in order to contribute to the debate about the role of the underlying diseases and/or drug immunosuppression in PML occurrence. METHODS: We searched for drug-induced PML cases in two international spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) report databases, FDA-AERS and WHO-VigiBase. From MEDLINE, we retrieved case reports and case series containing the MESH term "leukoencephalopathy, progressive multifocal/chemically induced". In order to assess the PML-drug relationship, we analysed drug-reaction pairs in terms of the patients' underlying diseases and co-suspected drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 214 cases in FDA-AERS, 118 in WHO-VigiBase and 140 in MEDLINE were collected. Therapeutic groups more frequently involved in PML cases were monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), conventional immunosuppressive drugs and anti-HIV drugs. The most frequent underlying diseases were lymphoproliferative diseases (28%), autoimmune disorders (20%) and transplants (10%). MAbs were more often reported in cases where they were the only suspected drugs, whereas for the other therapeutic groups, concomitant drugs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: We found a strong relationship between PML and MAbs, especially when used in autoimmune diseases. PML is becoming a crucial issue of MAbs, since they can cause severe ADRs through the imbalance of the immune system. Based on these results, patients treated with MAbs should be carefully monitored for early signs and symptoms of PML.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/inducido químicamente , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Alemtuzumab , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Anticuerpos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/clasificación , Terapia Biológica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunomodulación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/complicaciones , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/complicaciones , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab , Trasplante
12.
Drug Saf ; 29(12): 1163-72, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17147462

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Signal detection is a crucial element in recognising new adverse drug reactions (ADRs) as soon as possible. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors ('statins'), the most potent cholesterol-lowering drugs, are generally well tolerated but can occasionally lead to liver toxicity. Pre- and postmarketing studies on statins revealed an incidence of 0.1-3% elevation in hepatic transaminase levels. However, these elevations are asymptomatic, reversible, dose related or probably due to other causes. Postmarketing studies clearly showed the lack of evidence of hepatotoxicity from statins, apart from some isolated case reports of serious hepatic damage described in the literature. It is still unclear whether serious hepatic reactions are dose related and more frequent than the expected rate in the general population. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the hypothesis that fluvastatin could cause serious liver injuries more than the other statins is investigated, in the light of a quantitative and qualitative signal analysis, drug consumption data and evidence from the literature. METHODS: The Italian Interregional Group of Pharmacovigilance (Gruppo Interregionale di Farmacovigilanza; GIF) is an example of signal detection within the Italian spontaneous ADR reporting system. The GIF database holds reports of suspected ADRs submitted by five Italian pharmacovigilance regional centres. In the GIF database, all reports of suspected ADRs are classified according to the WHO criteria for causality assessment. The reactions are coded according to the WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology and classified as serious or non-serious events on the basis of the WHO Critical Term List. Every 6 months the GIF database is analysed to extract potential signals through a qualitative case-by-case analysis and using a quantitative methodology called proportional reporting ratio (PRR). This methodology permitted us to identify the potential signal 'fluvastatin and hepatic reactions'. RESULTS: At 31 December 2004, the GIF database contained 35 757 reports with an annual reporting rate of 170 reports per million inhabitants. We found a total of 1260 reports of ADRs related to statins, including 178 of hepatic reactions. Sixty-nine reports were attributed to fluvastatin, which showed the highest PRR in comparison with the other statins. Fluvastatin was associated with 33 serious reactions, mainly hepatitis and cholestatic hepatitis. The number of reports of severe hepatotoxicity associated with fluvastatin started to increase from 2002. About half of them did not report other suspected or concomitant drugs and in one third the hepatotoxicity occurred after <1 month of therapy. Twenty-seven out of 33 patients were female, and fluvastatin was administered at 80 mg/day in 81% of cases reporting complete data on drug dosage. CONCLUSION: In the literature, serious hepatic reactions are rarely described in patients taking statins; however, data gathered by GIF suggest that cases of hepatotoxicity are reported more often than expected. In addition, GIF data seem to reveal that fluvastatin is more likely to cause hepatic reactions than the other statins. However, this is a preliminary signal and future evaluations are certainly needed to confirm it and to quantify this possible risk.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Ácidos Grasos Monoinsaturados/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Indoles/efectos adversos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Anciano , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fluvastatina , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
13.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 35(2): 289-301, 2004 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15063463

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to set up and validate an RP-LC method with DAD-detection to quantify caffeic acid derivatives in various Echinacea spp. Samples were extracted with 80% methanol. The analyses were carried out on a Lichrospher RP-18 column (125 mm x 4 mm i.d., 5 microm), with a mobile phase gradient, which increases the acetonitrile level in a phosphoric acid solution (0.1%). The flow rate was 1.5 ml/min. Detection was set at 330 nm. This method allowed the identification and quantification of caftaric acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, cynarin, echinacoside and cichoric acid in Echinacea roots and derivatives. The total phenolic content was 10.49 mg/g for E. angustifolia, 17.83 mg/g for E. pallida and 23.23 mg/g for E. purpurea. Among Echinacea commercial herbal medicines, a certain variability in the concentrations of phenolic compounds was observed. The radical scavenging activity of Echinacea methanolic extracts was evaluated in vitro with a spectrophotometric method based on the reduction of an alcoholic 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH*) radical solution at 517 nm in the presence of a hydrogen donating antioxidant. As for pure compounds, echinacoside had the highest capacity to quench DPPH* radicals (EC50 = 6.6 microM), while caftaric acid had the lowest (EC50 = 20.5 microM). The average EC50 values for E. purpurea, E. pallida and E. angustifolia were 134, 167 and 231 microg/ml, respectively. The radical scavenging activity of Echinacea root extracts reflected their phenolic composition. The results indicate that Echinacea roots and derivatives are a good source of natural antioxidants and could be used to prevent free-radical-induced deleterious effects.


Asunto(s)
Echinacea , Depuradores de Radicales Libres/análisis , Fenoles/análisis , Depuradores de Radicales Libres/química , Fenoles/química , Extractos Vegetales/análisis , Extractos Vegetales/química , Raíces de Plantas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...