Patient Preferences and Knowledge Regarding Hysterectomy: A Study from the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network (FPRN)®.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe preference for and knowledge of hysterectomy routes in women presenting to urogynecology/gynecology clinics throughout the United States and to determine association with health literacy. Our primary aim was preference for hysterectomy route, and secondary aims were knowledge of basic pelvic structures and function, knowledge of various hysterectomy routes, and baseline health literacy level. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network. Patients' preference and knowledge for hysterectomy routes were assessed at initial presentation to the urogynecology/gynecology clinic with an anonymous, voluntary, self-administered questionnaire along with a validated health literacy test (Medical Term Recognition Test). RESULTS: Two hundred four women participated. Forty-five percent of patients were unsure which hysterectomy modality they would choose. Of patients who selected a preferred modality, 50% selected laparoscopic and 33% selected vaginal. Patients indicated that safety was considered highest priority when selecting route. The mean score for "knowledge about gynecology/hysterectomy" was 68%, with the high literacy group scoring higher compared with the low health literacy group (70% vs 60.1%, P = 0.01). More than 50% of patients incorrectly answered knowledge questions related to vaginal hysterectomy. Majority of the respondents had high health literacy (79.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients prefer laparoscopic hysterectomy approach, although have limited understanding of vaginal hysterectomy. Higher health literacy levels are associated with increased knowledge of gynecology and hysterectomy routes, but were not found to influence patient preference for hysterectomy route. Overall, patients have limited knowledge of vaginal hysterectomy.

Inappropriate oophorectomy at time of benign premenopausal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed rates of oophorectomy during benign hysterectomy around the release of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2008 practice bulletin on prophylactic oophorectomy, and evaluated predictors of inappropriate premenopausal oophorectomy. METHODS: A cross-sectional administrative database analysis was performed utilizing the California Office of Statewide Health Planning Development Patient Discharge Database for years 2005 to 2011. After identifying all premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions, International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 diagnosis codes were reviewed to create a master list of indications for oophorectomy. We defined appropriate oophorectomy as cases with concomitant coding for ovarian cyst, breast cancer susceptibility gene carrier status, and other diagnoses. Using patient demographics and hospital characteristics to predict inappropriate oophorectomy, a logistic regression model was created. RESULTS: We identified 57,776 benign premenopausal hysterectomies with oophorectomies during the period studied. Of the premenopausal oophorectomies, 37.7% (21,783) were deemed "inappropriate" with no documented reason for removal. The total number of premenopausal inpatient hysterectomies with oophorectomy decreased yearly (12,227/y in 2005 to 5,930/y in 2011). However, the percentage of inappropriate oophorectomies remained stable. In multivariate analysis, Hispanic and African American ethnicity/race associated with increased odds of inappropriate oophorectomy (P < 0.001). Urban and at low Medi-Cal utilization hospitals showed increased odds of inappropriate oophorectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In premenopausal women undergoing benign hysterectomy, over one-third undergo oophorectomy without an appropriate indication documented. The rate of inappropriate oophorectomy in California has not changed since the 2008 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. Whereas the absolute number of inpatient hysterectomies for benign indications has decreased, our work suggests persistent utilization of oophorectomy in premenopausal women, despite well-documented long-term adverse health implications.

Management of cesarean scar pregnancy in the second trimester: a report of three cases.

BACKGROUND: A modern entity of the cesarean scar pregnancy with or without uterine dehiscence has been described and is increasing in incidence. Early diagnosis is difficult, and management in the second trimester poses a significant clinical challenge. The best options for management are unclear due to lack of data in this area. CASES: Three women presented with cesarean scar pregnancy and underwent suction dilation and curettage (D&C) at 13, 13, and 14 weeks' gestation, respectively. One procedure was complicated by hematometra, and reevacuation was successful. The second and third cases resulted in hysterectomy due to uncontrollable hemorrhage after suction D&C, and pathology revealed pathologically adherent placenta in both cases. CONCLUSION: Intragestational sac methotrexate has not been reported at these later gestational ages for treatment of cesarean scar.pregnancies. D&C should be used judiciously in these patients due to the high risk of complications.