Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 37(3): 651-658, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217573

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Translation and validation of important scales in other languages reduce bias in reporting the functional status of the patient. OBJECTIVE: To translate the Back Pain Functional Scale into Urdu (BPFSu), adapt it for use in other cultures, and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHOD: According to Beaton guidelines, translation and cultural adaption was carried out. On 100 Urdu-literate men and women aged 18-60 years with lower back pain, the final BPFSu was assessed for psychometric qualities. First at baseline and again after 7 days, participants completed the BPFSu, the Functional Rating Index (FRI), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). RESULTS: Internal consistency of the BPFSu was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.937). No floor and ceiling effects were found Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.882, CI 95%; 0.830-0.919) was achieved. Spearman correlation coefficient showed criterion validity with the NPRS (rho =â⁢⁢0.701, p⩽ 0.001) and Pearson correlation coefficient showed construct validity with the FRI (r=â⁢⁢0.740, p⩽ 0.001). The minimum detectable changes were 9.96, while the standard error of measurement was 3.6. CONCLUSION: The BPFSu is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing physical function in individuals experiencing low back discomfort.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Dimensión del Dolor , Psicometría , Traducciones , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Masculino , Psicometría/normas , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven , Comparación Transcultural , Adolescente , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA