Thorough QTc Evaluation and the Safety of Supratherapeutic Doses of Odanacatib in Healthy Subjects.

Assessing risk for QTc interval prolongation in a thorough QTc study is a standard recommendation when evaluating new chemical entities. As part of the clinical development program for odanacatib, an oral selective inhibitor of cathepsin K previously in development for the treatment of osteoporosis, 2 clinical studies in healthy subjects assessed pharmacokinetics and overall safety (including potential for delayed ventricular repolarization) of a supratherapeutic dose. In study 1, subjects received a supratherapeutic dose regimen of odanacatib (300 mg on day 1, then daily multiple doses of 25 mg to day 21) or placebo. In study 2 (days 1-4), subjects received the odanacatib supratherapeutic dose regimen or moxifloxacin (positive control, single 400-mg dose on day 4; matching placebo for odanacatib/moxifloxacin) or placebo. All doses were administered with a high-fat meal. In study 1 (N = 12), the supratherapeutic dosing regimen achieved exposure ∼3.5-fold of the proposed therapeutic dose (50 mg once weekly) and was sufficiently well tolerated to permit assessment in the thorough QTc study (study 2). In study 2 (N = 116), the primary objective was placebo-corrected change from baseline in QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction), assessed by replicate electrocardiograms (12-lead Holter recordings; days -1 through 7). Supratherapeutic odanacatib dosing was not associated with increased risk of prolonged QT interval, unlike moxifloxacin (confirming assay sensitivity). Pooled safety data across both studies suggested that the safety profile of odanacatib at high exposures was similar to placebo, with a small clustering of oral cavity adverse events. Odanacatib was not associated with increased risk of prolonged QT interval.

Preclinical to Human Translational Pharmacology of the Novel M1 Positive Allosteric Modulator MK-7622.

The current standard of care for treating Alzheimer's disease is acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, which nonselectively increase cholinergic signaling by indirectly enhancing activity of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors. These drugs improve cognitive function in patients, but also produce unwanted side effects that limit their efficacy. In an effort to selectively improve cognition and avoid the cholinergic side effects associated with the standard of care, various efforts have been aimed at developing selective M1 muscarinic receptor activators. In this work, we describe the preclinical and clinical pharmacodynamic effects of the M1 muscarinic receptor-positive allosteric modulator, MK-7622. MK-7622 attenuated the cognitive-impairing effects of the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine and altered quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) in both rhesus macaque and human. For both scopolamine reversal and qEEG, the effective exposures were similar between species. However, across species the minimum effective exposures to attenuate the scopolamine impairment were lower than for qEEG. Additionally, there were differences in the spectral power changes produced by MK-7622 in rhesus versus human. In sum, these results are the first to demonstrate translation of preclinical cognition and target modulation to clinical effects in humans for a selective M1 muscarinic receptor-positive allosteric modulator.

Single-dose euglycaemic clamp studies demonstrating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity between MK-1293 insulin glargine and originator insulin glargine (Lantus) in subjects with type 1 diabetes and healthy subjects.

AIMS: MK-1293 is an insulin glargine that has an amino acid sequence identical to that of Lantus, the originator insulin glargine. Two euglycaemic clamp studies, 1 in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 1 in healthy subjects, were conducted to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity between MK-1293 and Lantus commercially procured in both the European Union (EU-Lantus) and the USA (US-Lantus). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both studies were single-dose, randomized, double-blind, single-centre, crossover studies with ≥7 days between dosing periods. A 2-treatment, 4-period replicate crossover study in T1D subjects (N = 76) compared the PK and PD of MK-1293 to EU-Lantus for 30 hours after dosing. A 3-period crossover study in healthy subjects (N = 109) compared the PK and PD of MK-1293, EU-Lantus and US-Lantus for 24 hours after dosing. In both studies, all subjects received single 0.4 units/kg subcutaneous doses of MK-1293 or Lantus in all dosing periods. Pharmacokinetic assessment was based on LC-MS/MS-based measurement of the major insulin glargine metabolite (M1) and PD was characterized using the euglycaemic clamp platform. RESULTS: In both studies, pre-specified similarity criteria were met between MK-1293 and Lantus for comparison of PK (AUC0-24 and Cmax of M1) and PD (GIR-AUC0-24 , GIR-AUC0-12 , GIR-AUC12-24 , and GIRmax ) primary endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Based on comparative assessment in both T1D and healthy subjects, it can be concluded that the PK and PD properties of MK-1293 are highly similar to those of Lantus. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02059174).

Prednisone has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A4 metabolized drugs - midazolam and odanacatib.

We evaluated the effect of prednisone on midazolam and odanacatib pharmacokinetics. In this open-label, 2-period crossover study in healthy male subjects, midazolam 2 mg was administered (Day -1) followed by odanacatib 50 mg (Day 1) during Part 1. In Period 2, prednisone 10 mg once daily (qd) was administered on Days 1-28; odanacatib was co-administered on Day 14 and midazolam 2 mg was co-administered on Days 1 and 28. Subjects were administered midazolam 2 mg on Days 42 and 56. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was also built. There were 15 subjects enrolled; mean age was 31 years. The odanacatib AUC(0- ∞) GMR (90% CI) [odanacatib + prednisone (Day 14, Period 2)/odanacatib alone (Day 1, Period 1] was 1.06 (0.96, 1.17). AUC(0-∞) GMR (90%CI) [midazolam + prednisone (Day 28, Period 2)/midazolam alone (Day -1, Period 1] was 1.08 (0.93,1.26). There were no serious AEs or AEs leading to discontinuation. PBPK modeling showed that prednisone does not cause significant effects on the exposure of sensitive CYP3A4 substrates in vivo at therapeutic doses. Co-administration of prednisone 10 mg qd had no effect on pharmacokinetics of either odanacatib 10 mg or midazolam 2 mg.

Odanacatib, a selective cathepsin K inhibitor, demonstrates comparable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in older men and postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Odanacatib is a cathepsin K inhibitor in development for the treatment of osteoporosis. Evaluation of therapies to ensure that treatment effects are relevant regardless of sex is clinically important. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, older men (aged 50-75 years) and postmenopausal women (aged 45-75 years) were given odanacatib 50 mg once weekly or placebo for 4 weeks. Pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluation measured weighted average inhibition (WAI) of urine amino-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (uNTx/Cr) after odanacatib administration. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter data were collected, and an analysis of sex as a factor in the PK/PD relationship was conducted. Adverse events were monitored. The hypotheses were that WAI of uNTx/Cr would be >40% (including >40% for the lower limit of the 90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for older men and postmenopausal women, that there would be no important differences in area under the curve from 0 to 168 hours (AUC0-168 h) between men and women, and that odanacatib would be safe and well tolerated. RESULTS: A total of 44 subjects (32 men and 12 women) were randomized. The least squares mean WAI (uNTx/Cr) at week 4 was 42.8% (90% CI, 35.5%-49.3%) for men and 42.7% (90% CI, 30.3%-52.9%) for women; mean values were >40%, but lower bounds were <40% as prespecified in the primary hypothesis. The differences among men and women in PD parameters were not meaningful (0.1; 90% CI, -14.7 to 14.9). PK parameters for both groups were comparable (geometric mean ratio of AUC0-168 h, 0.90; 90% CI, 0.75-1.07). A PK/PD analysis found that the EC50 and maximum fractional inhibition were similar in male and female subjects. There were no notable or serious adverse events in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary hypothesis was not met, there were no clinically meaningful differences in PD, PK, or PK/PD parameters between older men and postmenopausal women, supporting further research on odanacatib (50 mg once weekly) as a treatment for male osteoporosis. Odanacatib was generally well tolerated.

Early-stage comparative effectiveness: randomized controlled trial with histamine inverse agonist MK-7288 in excessive daytime sleepiness patients.

Histaminergic neurons are regulators of the sleep-wake cycle. We evaluated the alerting effects of MK-7288 (10, 20 mg), a novel histamine-3 receptor inverse agonist (H3RIA), along with modafinil (200 mg), a standard treatment, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of 56 patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Efficacy was assessed using maintenance of wakefulness tests (MWT) and car driving simulation tests. MK-7288 and modafinil significantly prolonged MWT sleep latency (improvements vs. placebo of 8.1 to 8.2 min for MK-7288 and 10.2 min for modafinil), and improved car driving simulation standard deviation of lane position (reduction vs. placebo of -0.1 m for each treatment). MK-7288 was associated with more insomnia (29%) than modafinil (9%) and placebo (6%). The study demonstrated the potential of the H3RIA mechanism for treating EDS, but did not show efficacy differentiation from modafinil. Early-stage comparative effectiveness can help prevent late-stage failure and increase the cost-effectiveness of drug development.