The recommended lifetime immunization schedule from the board of vaccination calendar for life in Italy: A continuing example of impact on public health policies.

The Vaccination Calendar for Life is an alliance of scientific and professional societies of public health physicians, paediatricians and general practitioners in Italy which provides a periodical update on the ideal, scientifically driven vaccination calendar throughout lifetime. Since 2012, the Lifetime Immunization Schedule has represented a benchmark for Regional and National Authorities to set up the updated list of vaccines provided actively and free of charge to infants, children, adolescents, adults and the elderly by inclusion in the Triennial National Vaccination Plan (TNVP), and in the Essential Levels of Care (LEA). The impact of the different editions of the Lifetime Immunization Schedule on the TNVP was deep, representing the inspiring source for the present vaccination policy. The 2019 edition called for more attention to pregnant women immunization; risk groups vaccination; uniform high coverage with the MMRV vaccine; extension of Meningococcal B vaccination also at adolescent age; use of quadrivalent conjugate meningococcal vaccine also at 1 year of life; progressive decrease of the age of free-of-charge offer of influenza to ≥ 60 and then to ≥ 50 year-old population; implementation of flu immunization ages 6 months-6 years; HPV vaccination also offered to 25-year old women at the time of the first screening (gender neutral immunization already offered); sequential PCV13-PPV23 pneumococcal vaccination in 65 year-old subjects; increased coverage with rotavirus vaccine in infants and zoster vaccine in the elderly.

Maintain and increase vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, adults and elderly people: Let's avoid adding epidemics to the pandemic: Appeal from the Board of the Vaccination Calendar for Life in Italy: Maintain and increase coverage also by re-organizing vaccination services and reassuring the population.

The Board of the Vaccination Calendar for Life (Bonanni et al., 2014, 2017) [1,2]), a coalition of four major scientific and professional societies of public health physicians, pediatricians and general practitioners in Italy, made an appeal to health authorities in order to sustain vaccination in COVID-19 times. The five pillars to maintain and increase vaccination coverage at all ages are described as follows: 1) Guarantee paediatric vaccination coverage to all newborns and paediatric boosters and adolescent immunizations, not interrupting active calls and scheduled sessions. 2) Re-organise the way paediatric and adolescent vaccinations are offered. 3) Set-up recovery programs for vaccinations not carried out after the start of the COVID-19 emergency. 4) Provide the preparation of tenders for the supply of flu vaccines with suitable quantities to increase coverage in all Regions and Autonomous Provinces with extreme urgency. 5) Prepare plans to increase coverage for influenza, pneumococcal, tetanus diphtheria and shingles. The Board of the Calendar for Life appeals to the National and Local Health Authorities for a strong and coordinated commitment in favor of the widest offer and acceptance of vaccinations, whose vital importance for collective health is now even more evident to all, in order to avoid that delays in the necessary initiatives should add damage from other epidemics to those suffered by our population due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

[The support of the ultrasonography of the shoulder in the diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate]. / L'ausilio dell'ecografia della spalla nella diagnosi della polimialgia reumatica con velocità di eritrosedimentazione normale.

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a chronic inflammatory syndrome that affects the elderly population and whose diagnosis is mainly based on clinical criteria taking little advantage of the latest innovatory methods of diagnostic imaging, for instance ultrasonography. Although it is generally characterised by increasing of inflammation values as well as pain and stiffness on the shoulder and pelvic girdles, there is a significant percentage of patients with PMR whose erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is normal; in this case to make a diagnosis is difficult. The purpose of our study is to demonstrate how useful ultrasound investigations on the shoulders joints could be in order to make a diagnosis of PMR, especially for those patients with atypical normal ESR. Our case control study included 23 patients with atypical PMR and 88 patients with standard symptomatic PMR; both groups underwent shoulder ultrasound scans before receiving steroid therapy. As it has been previously shown, the ultrasound method is able to detect distinctive aspects in the joints and tissues of the patients with PMR; so that we could find that 90% of the patients with PMR of both groups suffered from bilateral subdeltoid bursitis. This disorder is seldom found in healthy people and consequently its presence could be considered a useful diagnostic test/check for/of PMR independently from ESR values.

[Comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of hospital discharge records]. / Comorbidità nell'artrite reumatoide: un'analisi delle schede di immissione ospedaliera.

OBJECTIVE: Arthritis is often associated with comorbidities. For many of them, such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and upper gastrointestinal disease, arthritis and its treatment may also represent a risk factor. This study is concerned with an evaluation of the frequency of comorbidities in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The discharge diagnoses of patients with RA during the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2000 were retrieved from the database of the Department of Internal Medicine of the University of Genova, Italy. The diagnosis of RA was made if the patient's discharge record contained the code 714 of the International Classification of Diseases, IX revision, as first 3 numbers. The other diagnoses were also recorded along with demographic data, type and duration of hospital stay, and performed procedures. RESULTS: During the study period, 427 patients with RA were admitted to the hospital for a total number of 761 admissions, which represented 2.2% of total admissions. Ninety-one (21.3%) patients did not have comorbidities, whereas 336 (78.6%) had one or more comorbidities. The most frequently observed comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (34.6%), including hypertension (14.5%) and angina (3.5%), followed by gastrointestinal (24.5%), genito-urinary (18.7%) and respiratory (17%) diseases. There was a male predominance (p=0.004) within patients with comorbidities, who were significantly older (64.2+/-3.2 years vs. 57.2+/-4.2 years; p<0.001) and required longer periods of hospital stay (22.7 days vs. 12.5 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities are present in nearly 80% of RA inpatients. Comorbidity is a good predictor of health outcome, health services utilization, and medical costs. Because RA comorbidity can act as confounder, it should be considered in epidemiologic studies and clinical trials.

[Methodology of an epidemiologic prevalence study in rheumatology: the Chiavari study]. / Metodologia di uno studio epidemiologico di prevalenza in reumatologia: lo studio di Chiavari.

OBJECTIVES: Goals of epidemiological studies are the description of the measures of frequency of diseases, the attempt to clarify possible etiopathogenic mechanisms, and the provision of data to support health policy decisions. To increase the familiarity of rheumatologists toward epidemiology, we describe the methodology used in a prevalence study of musculoskeletal complaints performed in Chiavari, Italy. METHODS: A questionnaire, originally developed by the Epidemiology Unit of the Arthitis Research Council in Manchester, UK, to investigate the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, was used after translation and validation. 4456 subjects aged 16 years or more listed in four general practices were invited to participate in the study and to fill the ARC questionnaire. The 3294 responders reported a) any past occurrence of joint swelling lasting more than four weeks and the distribution of the swollen joints on a mannequin; b) any joint pain lasting more than four weeks; c) current joint pain or swelling; d) morning stiffness; e) whether they had been previously told by a doctor they had arthritis. RESULTS: Four steps were necessary to obtain a 74% response, i.e. direct contact, two mailings and a phone interview. The performance of the different questions was good. The prevalence of the most common conditions among patients answering positively to the questions regarding morning stiffness and symmetrical swelling of joints was as follows: osteoarthritis 2.60%, fibromyalgia 1.30%, carpal tunnel syndrome 1.14%, rheumatoid arthritis 0.31%, and psoriatic arthritis 0.10%. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological issues regarding the selection of the population and sample to study, the development of a questionnaire, and the problems in obtaining valid informations are discussed.

Presenting features of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and rheumatoid arthritis with PMR-like onset: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in a prospective study whether patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with PMR-like onset show distinctive clinical and laboratory features. METHODS: A cohort of 116 consecutive patients with bilateral girdle pain for at least one month and raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was studied and followed up for 12 months. Laboratory tests included determination of ESR, IgM rheumatoid factor, haemoglobin, white blood cell count, platelet count, percentage of CD8 lymphocytes, serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and glutamyltransferase concentrations. RESULTS: At first examination, RA was diagnosed in 22/116 (19%) patients and PMR in 94 (81%) patients. During the follow up period, 19 additional patients developed RA, and the diagnosis of PMR was confirmed in 65 (56%) patients at the end of the study. Of the clinical and laboratory features, only the presence of peripheral synovitis could differentiate patients who will develop RA from those with "true" PMR, but the positive predictive value of this feature was poor. CONCLUSION: At present, there are no clinical or routine laboratory features allowing early differentiation between PMR and RA with PMR-like onset.

Prevalence of self-reported peripheral joint pain and swelling in an Italian population: the Chiavari study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of self-reported joint pain and swelling in the peripheral joints of subjects from an Italian general population. To correlate the result with demographic data and physical activity. METHODS: A total of 4,456 subjects aged 16 years or more listed in four general practices were invited to participate in the study and to fill out the ARC questionnaire. The 3,294 responders were asked to report: (a) any past occurrence of joint swelling lasting more than 4 weeks and the distribution of the swollen joints on a mannequin; (b) any joint pain lasting more than 4 weeks; (c) current joint pain or swelling; (d) morning stiffness; (e) whether they had been previously told by a doctor they had arthritis; and (f) their physical activity according to a three-class scale. RESULTS: Joint pain was reported by 889 (27%) subjects and joint swelling was reported by 463 (14%) subjects. Women reported joint pain and swelling more frequently than men, except for the younger age classes. The prevalence of joint pain and swelling increased with age in both sexes until age 55-64, when a plateau was observed. Age was involved in the determination of joint pain and swelling. Physical activity was involved only marginally. CONCLUSIONS: We found high levels of prevalence of pain and swelling in the peripheral joints in a general Italian population. Prevalence was higher in Italian subjects than in subjects from China and Pakistan studied using the same questionnaire. These differences may reflect cultural and social diversity in the perception of disease, as well as true differences in the prevalence of rheumatic symptoms across the world.

[Pure analgesics in a rheumatological outpatient clinic] / La terapia con analgesici puri in un ambulatorio reumatologico.

OBJECTIVE: Pure analgesics are only rarely used by Italian clinicians and this holds true also for rheumatologists. This work is concerned with an evaluation of the use of analgesics in a rheumatological outpatient clinic during the period 1989-1999. METHODS: The records of 1705 patients consecutively seen at the clinic were downloaded on a specifically built website. RESULTS: 4469 visits were considered. In 260 of them (5.8%), analgesics were prescribed to 234 (13.7%) patients. The number of patients with a prescription of analgesics steadily increased during the years 1989-1999. The diagnoses in patients assuming analgesics were: osteoarthritis (47.1%), inflammatory arthritis (24.2%), soft tissue rheumatisms (13.7%), nonspecific arthralgia/myalgia (7.5%), and connective tissue diseases (2.6%). Peripheral analgesics were used in 188 (82.5%) patients and central analgesics were used in the remaining 40 patients (17.5%). Analgesic drugs were used mainly in degenerative joint conditions. The indications for analgesics in the 55 patients with inflammatory arthritis were: (a) partial or total remission of arthritis; for this reason non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were no longer required in 18 patients; (b) to increase the analgesic effect of NSAIDs in 23 patients; (c) contraindications to NSAIDs in 14 patients (renal failure in 2 patients, gastritis in 10, allergy and bleeding in the remaining two). CONCLUSIONS: About 14% of our outpatients were treated with analgesics with an increasing trend in the examined period. The main indications for analgesics are degenerative conditions but they can be used also in selected patients with arthritis.

Uterine carcinosarcomas: incidence and trends in management and survival.

Our study's aim was to determine the incidence of uterine sarcomas in New York City (NYC) and evaluate trends in frequency, treatment, and survival of carcinosarcomas in two Brooklyn hospitals. Population-based cancer registry data for 1976-1985 were used to calculate the incidence of uterine sarcomas in NYC women. Medical records and histology slides of carcinosarcomas at two central Brooklyn hospitals from 1960 to 1995 were reviewed. The incidence of uterine sarcomas in black and white women in NYC was 33.4 and 17.0 per million (P < 0.01). Among 97 women with carcinosarcomas diagnosed in 1960-1995, 75% were diagnosed preoperatively, 82% had a hysterectomy, and 45% of those in clinical stage I were upstaged. Predictors of mortality included the presence of extrauterine extension, deep myometrial invasion, vascular space invasion, and gross residual disease, with only the first two being independent predictors of survival in a multivariate analysis. Adjunctive therapy shifted from radiation in 1960-1969 to cisplatin-based chemotherapy after 1980. In surgical stage III, survival increased significantly between 1960-1979 and 1980-1995, but improvement could not be ascribed to particular therapies. The incidence of uterine sarcomas in black women was twice that in white women. Surgical staging including omentectomy is recommended in the management of carcinosarcomas. Modern medical care may have improved the short-term prognosis of carcinosarcomas.

Adjunctive radiation after radical hysterectomy in stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

The clinical-pathologic records of 178 women with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma treated by radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection were reviewed to assess prognostic factors and outcome in relation to adjunctive pelvic radiation. Among 32 women with pelvic nodes metastases, 19 treated with adjunctive radiation had longer recurrence-free intervals and more extrapelvic metastases than 13 nonirradiated women. However, among irradiated women recurrences were more rapidly fatal, so that the survival of the two groups was similar. Among 54 women with deeply invading (10 mm or more) carcinomas confined to the uterus, 17 with adjunctive radiation had recurrence-free intervals and survivals similar to 37 women without radiation, despite more high-risk factors in the irradiated group. The findings suggest that adjunctive pelvic radiation may control pelvic recurrence but not extend survival.

Accuracy and pitfalls of frozen section during thyroid surgery.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of frozen sections performed during thyroid surgery and to define any pitfalls they may have. The material includes a series of 190 frozen section examinations of thyroid pathology. The overall accuracy of frozen section in this series was 95%. There were no false positives in our series and false negatives related to only follicular adenomas. In two patients, the report was deferred for permanent slide examination. Nine patients had lesions reported as malignant; however, the distinct cell type was not designated on frozen section. Eight specimens initially reported to have follicular adenoma on frozen section turned out to have angioinvasion or capsular invasion indicative of follicular carcinoma. Minor discrepancies between frozen and permanent sections in the types of benign disease were noted occasionally, but were not clinically significant. There was a discrepancy in the diagnosis of Hashimoto's thyroiditis on three occasions. The major discrepancy in patients with malignant pathology was related to the cell type. The diagnosis of anaplastic thyroid cancer, though suspected, was deferred for permanent sections in all cases. The diagnosis of medullary cancer of thyroid was difficult to make on frozen section. The major problem with frozen section was the diagnosis of follicular adenoma versus carcinoma. The benign diagnosis was changed in eight instances (out of 24 frozen sections) from follicular ademona to follicular carcinoma. Because of this experience, we do not provide the frozen section diagnosis to the patient and we wait until the final diagnosis is available.