Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lupus ; 33(6): 629-637, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38533912

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the new EULAR/ACR criteria, particularly for early detection of cSLE, in comparison to the SLICC criteria among the pediatric population in multiple centers in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that enrolled pediatric patients up to the age of 14 years who've been diagnosed with SLE and followed in pediatric rheumatology clinics at 9 multi-tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from 2010 to 2021 as a case group and were compared to a similar group of pediatric patients who've had defined rheumatological diseases other than SLE with a positive ANA titer (≥1:80) as controls. In total, 245 patients were included and distributed as 129 cases (diagnosed by expert pediatric rheumatologists) versus 116 patients in the control group. All relevant clinical information, including history, physical examination findings, and laboratory tests, was documented at the initial presentations. Then, the two sets of SLE classification criteria were applied to both groups to define who's going to meet both or either one of them. The exclusion criteria included those who had insufficient data or had overlapping or undifferentiated diseases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating curve (ROC), and accuracy were calculated for SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria (total scores≥ 10 and ≥ 13). We performed a Chi-squared test to compare sensitivity and specificity of SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019. RESULTS: For SLICC (cut-off ≥4 criteria), the sensitivity was found to be 96.9% (95% CI 92.6%-99.4%) and the specificity was 94.8% (95% CI 89.6%-98.32%), with PPV and NPV of 95.4% and 96.5%, respectively. The ROC for it was 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.99), and this criterion had an accuracy of 95%. Regarding EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), the performance measure showed a sensitivity of 99.2% and a specificity of 86.2%. Similarly, PPV was 88.9%; while NPV was a little higher (99.0%) than SLICC. The ROC for EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.96), and this criterion had an accuracy of 93%. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivity and specificity of either using SLICC or EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), as reflected by a p-value of 0.86 using the Chi-squared test. Although applying the EULAR/ACR with a total score of ≥ 13 revealed lower sensitivity (93.8%) than both the SLICC and the EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), the specificity for it was found to increase up to 91.4% (85.7-96.2%) compared to the (86.2%) specificity of the EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10). CONCLUSION: In this cohort among the Saudi population with childhood-onset SLE, the new EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria efficiently enable early detection of SLE, although a more frequent rate of false positives was observed with them. Escalating the total score from ≥ 10 to ≥ 13 in the cSLE population improved the specificity close to that of SLICC 2012. Further prospective studies in pediatrics need to be done for the validation of a cut- off score of ≥ 13 in cSLE rather than the traditional score of ≥ 10 in aSLE.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Humanos , Niño , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 73(4): 586-592, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32886859

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report the cumulative articular and extraarticular damage in Arab children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and to identify variables that correlate with disease damage. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study among 14 pediatric rheumatology centers from 7 Arab countries. JIA patients who met the International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria and had a disease duration of >1 year were enrolled. Disease activity status was assessed using the Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report. Disease damage was assessed by the Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index, articular (JADI-A) and extraarticular (JADI-E). RESULTS: A total of 702 (471 female) JIA patients with a median age of 11.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 8.0-14.0 years) were studied. Median age at disease onset was 5 years (IQR 2.0-9.0 years) and the median disease duration was 4 years (IQR 2.0-7.0 years). The most frequent JIA categories were oligoarticular JIA (34.9%), polyarticular JIA (29.5%), and systemic JIA (24.5%). Clinical remission was achieved in 73.9% of patients. At the last clinic visit, 193 patients experienced joint damage, with a mean ± SD JADI-A score of 1.7 ± 4.5, while 156 patients had extraarticular damage, with a mean ± SD JADI-E score of 0.5 ± 1.1. Patients with enthesitis-related arthritis had the highest JADI-A score. JADI-A correlated significantly with the presence of a family history of JIA. JADI-A and JADI-E had a significant correlation with long disease duration. CONCLUSION: Cumulative damage was common in this Arab JIA cohort, and consanguinity and JIA in a sibling were frequent findings and were associated with a greater cumulative damage.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulaciones/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Edad de Inicio , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Árabes/genética , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Juvenil/etnología , Artritis Juvenil/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Consanguinidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Herencia , Humanos , Articulaciones/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Linaje , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Pediatr Radiol ; 32(7): 523-8, 2002 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12107587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diseases exhibiting osteolysis in children are rare hereditary conditions. Several types have been recognised with different clinical manifestations. One type includes subcutaneous nodules, arthropathy and osteolysis and has been termed NAO syndrome. Previous radiological reports have described the affected bones, usually the carpal and tarsal regions, but a detailed analysis of the radiological findings of both the axial as well as the appendicular skeleton has not been reported. OBJECTIVES: To describe the radiological findings in a large group of children with an autosomal recessive disease characterized by nodules, familial arthropathy and osteolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprises 14 patients from 9 families and all patients had the triad of nodulosis, arthropathy and osteolysis (NAO). RESULTS: The most common radiological manifestations were osteopenia, undertubulation of long bones, arthritic changes, sclerotic sutures of the calvaria, osteolysis and muscle contractures. Other common findings were squared vertebrae, broad medial clavicles and brachycephaly. Progress of disease was documented in more than half of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first report of the detailed radiological findings of NAO syndrome. In NAO syndrome, both the axial and appendicular skeleton are involved


Asunto(s)
Artropatía Neurógena/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteólisis/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Artritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Artritis/patología , Artropatía Neurógena/patología , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/patología , Huesos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Osteólisis/patología , Radiografía , Arabia Saudita , Síndrome
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...