The prevalence and predictive factors of nocturnal polyuria in Japanese patients with nocturia: a multicentral retrospective cohort study.

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and predictors of nocturnal polyuria (NP) in Japanese patients. This multicentral, observational study enrolled patients with the chief complaint of nocturia at 17 Japanese institutions between January 2018 and December 2022. The frequency of daily voiding and volume of urination were evaluated using bladder diaries. NP was diagnosed in patients with an NP index of > 33%. The primary endpoint was NP prevalence in patients with nocturia. The secondary endpoints were the prevalence of NP according to sex and age and the identification of factors predicting NP. This study analyzed 875 eligible patients. NP was present in 590 (67.4%) patients, with prevalence rates of 66.6% and 70.0% in men and women, respectively. Age ≥ 78 years, body mass index (BMI) < 23.0 kg/m2, and patients with ischemic heart or cerebrovascular disease were significant predictors of NP (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.014, P = 0.016, respectively). This is the first large multicenter study to investigate the prevalence of NP in Japanese patients with nocturia. NP has a prevalence of 67.4%. Significant predictors of NP include age, BMI, and cardiovascular disease.

SMARCB1-deficient basal cell carcinoma of the prostate controlled using radiation therapy.

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma of the prostate is rare, with no established treatment for its recurrence or metastasis. We report a case involving basal cell carcinoma of the prostate controlled using radiotherapy. Case presentation: A 57-year-old man complained of perineal pain. Although his prostate-specific antigen was 0.657 ng/mL, a digital rectal examination revealed his prostate was stone hard. Prostate needle biopsy showed basal cell carcinoma of the prostate. The patient then underwent radical prostatectomy. Local recurrence and sacral bone metastasis appeared 2 months after surgery. OncoGuide™ NCC Oncopanel System showed deletion of SMARCB1; however no recommended treatment was identified. Thus, we decided to perform radiotherapy, which reduced all lesions. Conclusion: Basal cell carcinoma of the prostate may have a poor prognosis with recurrence or metastasis, hence evaluation of prognostic factors is important. In this case, the genomic profiling test suggested that SMARCB1 deletion may be a prognostic factor associated with disease progression.

Impacts of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Prior to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Postoperative Hormonal- and Sexual-Related Quality of Life - Assessment by Patient-Reported Questionnaire.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended by current guidelines in terms of oncological outcomes. Despite this, neoadjuvant HT is sometimes conducted before RP for a small proportion of patients in clinical practice. This study evaluated the impacts of neoadjuvant HT on hormonal- and sexual-related quality of life (QOL) among patients who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants comprised 470 patients divided into a non-neoadjuvant HT group (n = 408) and a neoadjuvant HT group (n = 62). Hormonal- and sexual-related QOL were measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire. RESULTS: Hormonal summary scores at 6 and 9 months, function scores before and 3, 6, and 9 months and bother score at 6 months after RARP were significantly lower in the neoadjuvant HT group than in the non-neoadjuvant HT group. Sexual function scores were decreased in the neoadjuvant HT group compared to the non-neoadjuvant HT group before and 6 months after RARP. In the neoadjuvant HT group, sexual function at 3 months after RARP was significantly worse in patients with >5 months of neoadjuvant HT than in patients with ≤5 months of neoadjuvant HT. Conversely, sexual bother at 3 months after RARP was significantly worse in patients with ≤5 months of neoadjuvant HT than in patients with >5 months of neoadjuvant HT. CONCLUSION: Vintage neoadjuvant HT prior to RARP should not be recommended due to not only oncological outcomes, but also the impacts on postoperative hormonal- and sexual-related QOL.