Caesarean Section Scar and Placental Location at the First Trimester of Pregnancy-A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Background and Objectives: This study aims to report the location of the placenta in the first trimester of pregnancy in groups of women according to the number of previous caesarean deliveries and the visibility of the caesarean scar niche. Materials and Methods: The prospective observational research included adult women aged 18 to 41 years during pregnancy after one or more previous caesarean sections (CSs). Transvaginal (TVS) and transabdominal sonography (TAS) was used to examine the uterine scar and placental location during 11-14 weeks. The CS scar niche ("defect") was bordered in the sagittal plane as a notch at the previous CS scar's site with a depth of 2.0 mm or more. A comparative analysis of the placental location (high or low and anterior or posterior) was performed between groups of women according to the CS number and the CS scar niche. Results: A total of 122 participants were enrolled during the first-trimester screening. The CS scar defect ("niche") was visible in 40.2% of cases. In cases after one previous CS, the placenta was low in the uterine cavity (anterior or posterior) at 77.4%, and after two or more CSs, it was at 67.9%. Comparing the two groups according to the CS scar niche, the placenta was low in 75.5% of cases in the participant group with a CS scar niche and in 75% of cases without a CS scar niche (p = 0.949). Conclusions: The number of previous caesarean deliveries has no effect on the incidence rate of low-lying placentas in the first trimester. Moreover, the presence of the CS scar niche is not associated with anterior low-lying placentas.

Incisional Small-Bowel Strangulation after a Caesarean Section: A Case Report.

Background and Objectives: Every surgical procedure has the possible risk of complications, and caesarean sections (CSs) are no exception. As CS rates are increasing worldwide, being familiar with rare but possible complications has become extremely important. Case report: We present a case of 25-year-old nulliparous patient who came to our hospital with twin pregnancy for a scheduled induction of labour. An urgent CS was performed due to labour dystocia. On the second postoperative day, the patient started to complain about pain in the epigastrium, but initially showed no signs of bowel obstruction, passing gas, and stools, and could tolerate oral intake. After a thorough examination, an early postoperative complication-small-bowel strangulation at the incision site-was diagnosed. Small bowels protruded in between sutured rectus abdominis muscle causing a strangulation which led to re-laparotomy. During the surgery, there was no necrosis of intestines, bowel resection was not needed, and abdominal wall repair was performed. After re-laparotomy, the patient recovered with no further complications. Conclusions: Although there are discussions about CS techniques, most guidelines recommend leaving rectus muscle unsutured. This case demonstrates a complication which most likely could have been avoided if the rectus muscle had not been re-approximated.

The Effect of Timing and Methods for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Obstetric Complications.

Aim. To compare the impact of the time and method of diagnosis on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women who gave birth at the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS) Kauno klinikos. Methods. A retrospective study was performed using data from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the LUHS Birth Registry to analyze the data of women who gave birth and had GDM in 2020-2021. The subjects were divided based on the type of diagnosis: GDM was diagnosed either at the first antenatal visit when fasting plasma glycemia (FPG) was ≥5.1 mmol/L (early diagnosis group) or after OGTT at 24 + 0 - 28 + 6 weeks of gestation when at least one pathological glycemic index was observed: fasting glycemia 5.1-6.9 mmol/L or 1-h glycemia ≥10.0 mmol/L or 2 h glycemia 8.5-11.0 mmol/L (late diagnosis group). The results were processed using IBM SPSS. Results. The early diagnosis group had 1254 (65.7%) women, the late diagnosis group had 654 (34.3%). More primigravida women were in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.017) while more multigravida were in the early diagnosis group (p = 0.033). The early diagnosis group had more obese women (p = 0.001), including those with a BMI > 40 (p = 0.001). In the early diagnosis group, GDM was more frequently diagnosed in women who gained <11 kg (p = 0.005), while in the late diagnosis group->16 kg (p = 0.001). FPG was higher in the early diagnosis group (p = 0.001). Glycemia was more commonly corrected with lifestyle changes in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.001), and with additional insulin therapy in the early diagnosis group (p = 0.001). Polyhydramnios and preeclampsia were more common in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.009). There were more large-for-gestational-age neonates in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.005). Macrosomia was more common in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.008). Conclusions. GDM is more commonly diagnosed with OGTT in primigravida women. Higher pregestational weight and BMI has an impact on the early diagnosis of GDM and need for insulin therapy with lifestyle changes. Late diagnosis of GDM is connected with obstetric complications.

Penetration of the gastric band through the gastric wall during pregnancy: A rare case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Obesity is a major health problem. Obese women have an increased risk of pregnancy-related complications. Weight loss before conception is associated with improved fertility rates and pregnancy outcomes. Bariatric surgery (BS), such as laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), was a popular option for obese women planning pregnancy. However, long-term follow-up studies indicate high rate of failure and reoperations. The work has been reported in line with the SCARE 2020 criteria. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 41-years-old multigravida who was diagnosed with intragastric penetration of the gastric band on the 27th week. Diagnostic laparoscopy and intraoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy were performed. Gastric band was not removed and no other surgical interventions were performed. The patient underwent a caesarean section on the 37th week, due to the remaining risk of repeated gastric-band-related complications. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The management of pregnancy following LAGB has not been well defined yet. Gastric band erosion with intragastric band migration is considered to be one of the most worrisome of all LAGB-related complications. CONCLUSION: International treatment consensus for pregnancy after BS is still missing. This case illustrates a need for practitioner to maintain a high index of suspicion of gastric-band-related complications during pregnancy. Gastric-band-related complications during pregnancy are rare with only limited number of published reports. To our knowledge, this is the first reported intragastric penetration of the gastric band in a pregnant woman, which was managed without gastric band removal during pregnancy and which had a good outcome for both, the patient and her baby.

Is it necessary to postpone pregnancy after bariatric surgery: a national cohort study.

The optimal interval between bariatric surgery (BS) and pregnancy remains clearly undefined. The aim of this study was to assess pregnancy outcomes according to the interval from BS to conception. The nationwide study cohort consisted of 130 women with previous BS and postoperative singleton delivery during 2005-2015 in Lithuania. Women who conceived within the first 12 months after BS were included in the early conception (EC) group (n = 30); who became pregnant after 1 year were included in the late conception (LC) group (n = 100). Mean surgery-to-conception time in the EC group was 6.9 ± 3.5 months; in the LC group was 41.4 ± 21.6 months. Anaemia was diagnosed significantly more frequently in women who conceived after 12 months compared with the EC group (56.0% versus 33.3%, p = .04). No significant differences were found between the EC and the LC group regarding gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, caesarean section rate, and adverse neonatal outcomes.Impact statementWhat is already known on the subject? Bariatric surgery is recognized as a safe and highly effective approach to obesity treatment. Optimal interval between bariatric surgery and conception remains undefined, however most bariatric surgeons advise patients to delay pregnancy for 12-18 months.What do the results of this study add? The results of our study did not show significant differences in pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes in women who conceived within the first 12 postoperative months and in women who conceived later. Women who become pregnant within the first year after surgery, should be reassured that obstetric complication rates generally are low.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Patients with prior BS should be provided with multidisciplinary prenatal care and screening for nutritional deficiencies during pregnancy. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal interval after BS and to assess the influence this interval has on perinatal outcomes.