Early cardiac mechanics abnormalities in patients with mitochondrial diseases.

BACKGROUND: Evidence about early cardiac mechanics abnormalities in patients with mitochondrial diseases (MDs) before overt cardiomyopathy is limited. METHODS: In this prospective study, we performed a comparative analysis of conventional and speckle tracking echocardiographic parameters between patients with genetically identified MDs and no overt cardiomyopathy vs controls matched for age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors. The Newcastle mitochondrial disease adult scale (NMDAS) was calculated, using a threshold of > 21 as indicator of high disease severity. RESULTS: We enrolled 24 MDs patients (50 % males, mean age 47.2 ± 14.3 years), the most prevalent mutation was the MT-TL1 m.3243A>G (37.5 %). In MDs patients all dimensional echocardiographic parameters were similar to controls. Conversely, albeit normal, Tissue Doppler septal systolic (p = 0.002) and early diastolic velocities (p = 0.016) were significantly lower and E/e' ratio was higher (p = 0.032) in MDs. Moreover, LV-GLS was significantly reduced in MDs as compared to their counterparties (20.2 ± 1.6 vs 22.6 ± 1.5, p < 0.001). Similarly, LA reservoir and conduit strain were significantly lower in MDs (31.7 ± 7.0 vs 35.9 ± 6.6, p = 0.038; 19.7 ± 5.6 vs 23.1 ± 6.0, p = 0.049 respectively), while LA contractile strain was similar between the two groups. Lower values of LV-GLS were observed in patients with NMDAS > 21 vs patients with NMDAS ≤ 21 (19.0 ± 1.2 vs 21.0 ± 1.3, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MDs and no overt cardiomyopathy Tissue Doppler and speckle tracking analysis unveil worse LV systolic and diastolic function indices as compared to controls. Reduced LV-GLS values were found especially in those with worse disease burden.

Pulmonary congestion assessed by lung ultrasound in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Prevalence and prognostic implications.

AIMS: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a sensitive tool to assess pulmonary congestion (PC). Few data are available on LUS-PC evaluation in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and prognostic impact of LUS-PC in patients with severe AS before and after TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed a single-centre prospective study in patients referred for TAVI for severe AS (ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT05024942). All patients underwent echocardiography and LUS (according to a simplified 8-zone scanning protocol) the day before and within 72 h after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure and urgent medical visits for worsening dyspnoea at 12-month follow-up. A total of 127 patients were enrolled (mean age 81.1 ± 5.8 years; 54.3% female). Pre-TAVI LUS-PC was documented in 65 patients (51%). After TAVI, the prevalence of LUS-PC significantly decreased as compared to pre-TAVI evaluation, being documented in only 28 patients (22% vs. 51%, p < 0.001) with a median B-lines score of 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-11) versus 11 (IQR 6-19) pre-TAVI (p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 12 (12-17) months, 25 patients (19.6%) met the composite endpoint. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, pre-TAVI LUS-PC was independently associated with cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 2.764, 95% confidence interval 1.114-6.857; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasonography reveals a high prevalence of PC in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI, which is significantly reduced by the procedure. Pre-TAVI PC, measured by LUS, is an independent predictor of 1-year clinical outcome.

A multimodal approach to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients undergoing valve-in-valve trans-catheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: The valve-in-valve transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation (VIV-TAVI) represents an emerging procedure for the treatment of degenerated aortic bio-prostheses, and the occurrence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after VIV-TAVI might affect its clinical efficacy. This study aimed to test a multimodal imaging approach to predict PPM risk during the TAVI planning phase and assess its clinical predictivity in VIV-TAVI procedures. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing VIV-TAVI procedures at our Institution over 6 years were screened and those treated by self-expandable supra-annular valves were selected. The effective orifice area (EOA) was calculated with a hybrid Gorlin equation combining echocardiographic data with invasive hemodynamic assessment. Severe PPM was defined according to such original multimodality assessment as EOAi≤0.65 cm2/m2 (if BMI < 30 kg/m2) or < 0.55 cm2/m2 (if BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and valve-related re-hospitalization during the clinical follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 40 VIV-TAVI was included in the analysis. According to the pre-specified multimodal imaging modality assessment, 18 patients (45.0 %) had severe PPM. Among all baseline clinical and anatomical characteristics, estimated glomerular filtration rate before VIV-TAVI (OR 0.872, 95%CI[0.765-0.994],p = 0.040), the echocardiographic pre-procedural ≥moderate AR (OR 0.023, 95%CI[0.001-0.964],p = 0.048), the MSCT-derived effective internal area (OR 0.958, 95%CI[0.919-0.999],p = 0.046) and the implantation depth (OR 2.050, 95%CI[1.028-4.086],p = 0.041) resulted as independent predictors of severe PPM at multivariable logistic analysis. At a mean follow-up of 630 days, patients with severe PPM showed a higher incidence of the primary endpoint (9.1%vs.44.4 %;p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In VIV-TAVI using self-expandable supra-annular valves, a multimodal imaging approach might improve clinical outcome predicting severe PPM occurrence.

Evolution and Prognostic Impact of Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Artery Coupling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence regarding the association between right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the evolution of RV-PA coupling in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR and its prognostic impact. METHODS: A total of 900 patients who underwent TAVR in 2 tertiary centers and with echocardiographic analysis performed within 3 months before and after the procedure were included. RV-PA coupling was measured as the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). RV-PA uncoupling was defined by TAPSE/PASP <0.55, whereas a TAPSE/PASP <0.32 identified a severe uncoupling. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients (58%) showed RV-PA uncoupling before TAVR, whereas post-TAVR RV-PA uncoupling was observed in 407 patients (45%). During a median follow-up of 40 months, 250 deaths (28%) occurred. Post-TAVR RV-PA uncoupling was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted HR: 1.474; 95% CI: 1.115-1.948; P = 0.006), whereas pre-TAVR uncoupling did not. Among patients with post-TAVR RV-PA uncoupling, the presence of severe uncoupling identified a subgroup with the worst survival (P = 0.008). Patients with RV-PA coupling recovery after TAVR showed similar outcomes as compared with patients with normal coupling. Conversely, the presence of either persistent or new-onset RV-PA uncoupling following TAVR was associated with an increased mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: Post-TAVR RV-PA uncoupling is an independent predictor of long-term mortality, irrespective of coupling before intervention. Assessment of TAPSE/PASP response after TAVR may be helpful to improve risk stratification.

Impact of Impella protected-percutaneous coronary intervention on left ventricle function recovery of patients with extensive coronary disease and poor left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND: The use of Impella support is increasingly adopted to "protect" patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricle (LV) dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: To evaluate the impact of Impella-protected (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA) PCIs on myocardial function recovery. METHODS: Patients with significant LV dysfunction undergoing multi-vessel PCIs with pre-intervention Impella implantation were evaluated by echocardiography before PCI and at median follow up of 6 months: global and segmental LV contractile function were assessed by LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion score index (WMSI), respectively. Extent of revascularization was graded using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Jeopardy score (BCIS-JS). Study endpoints were LVEF and WMSI improvement, and its correlation with revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 48 high surgical risk (mean EuroSCORE II 8) patients with median LVEF value of 30%, extensive wall motion abnormalities (median WMSI 2.16), and severe multi-vessel CAD (mean SYNTAX score 35) were included. PCIs brought a significant reduction of ischemic myocardium burden with BCIS-JS decrease from mean value of 12 to 4 (p < 0.001). At follow-up, WMSI reduced from 2.2 to 2.0 (p = 0.004) and LVEF increased from 30% to 35% (p = 0.016). WMSI improvement was proportional to the baseline impairment (R - 0.50, p < 0.001), and confined to revascularized segments (from 2.1 to 1.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with extensive CAD and severe LV dysfunction, multi-vessel Impella-protected PCI was associated to an appreciable contractile recovery, mainly determined by regional wall motion improvement in revascularized segments.

[Heart Team and heart valve diseases: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach]. / Heart Team e malattie valvolari: l'importanza di un approccio multidisciplinare.

Valvular heart diseases (VHD) are common in the elderly population and several therapeutic options are available to treat them. When selecting the management strategy for VHD patients, to evaluate the operatory risk, using special scores like STS score, EuroSCORE II and other more specific ones is pivotal. However, the risk scores do not consider some aspects, such as the clinical needs of the single patients, the management of local resources and the expertise of the center. The Heart Team, combining the experience of various specialists, can optimize the decision-making process through a better evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of the therapeutic choices. The multidisciplinary discussion of the most complex cases is recommended by the international guidelines for the management of VHD and it is part of the clinical practice of many centers. So far, both trials and large clinical studies supporting such multidisciplinary management are lacking. Despite these important limitations, the Heart Team can be actually regarded as a promising tool to locally promote best practices for the treatment of VHD patients.