Six-Month Real-World Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Ixekizumab After Switching from IL-23 Inhibitors and Other Biologic Therapies: The CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

BACKGROUND: Prior work showed that patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry who had previously failed a prior biologic and then initiated ixekizumab demonstrated improvements in disease severity and patient-reported outcomes after 6 months. However, newer therapies such as interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i) were not considered. Here, with more recent data including IL-23i, 6-month effectiveness of ixekizumab following a switch from any biologic was assessed as well as whether 6-month effectiveness of ixekizumab was impacted by prior biologic class. METHODS: We included CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry patients who initiated ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic therapy and had a corresponding 6-month follow-up visit following ixekizumab initiation (N = 743, 2016-2023). Immediate prior biologic class was categorized as tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i, n = 405), non-ixekizumab interleukin-17i (IL-17i, n = 237), or IL-23i (n = 101). Adjusted mean changes in body surface area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), itch, and skin pain were calculated for prior biologic class groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Proportions achieving ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100, respectively), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1, and DLQI 0/1 were calculated for all patients and compared among prior biologic classes via relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Mean improvements in BSA, DLQI, itch, and skin pain, were 7.6, 3.6, 23.3, and 16.7, respectively, for ixekizumab patients who switched from TNFi or IL-12/23i (all p < 0.05); 6.8, 3.3, 19.6, and 14.1, respectively, for those who switched from non-ixekizumab IL-17i (all p < 0.05); and 7.8, 3.4, 22.2, and 12.8, respectively, for those who switched from IL-23i (all p < 0.05). Overall, 54%, 41%, and 31% of ixekizumab initiators achieved PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100, respectively, 50% maintained or achieved IGA 0/1, and 48% maintained or achieved DLQI 0/1. The prior TNFi or IL-12/23i group was 31% more likely to achieve PASI100 (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.01, 1.69) and 32% more likely to maintain or achieve IGA 0/1 (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.11, 1.57), but not significantly more likely to achieve PASI90. The prior IL-23i group was 45% more likely to achieve PASI90 (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.10, 1.91), 55% more likely to achieve PASI100 (RR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.12, 2.13), and 39% more likely to maintain or achieve IGA 0/1 (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.12, 1.73) compared to the prior non-ixekizumab IL-17i group. Achievement of PASI75 and DLQI 0/1 was consistent across the prior TNFi or IL-12/23i, IL-23i, and non-ixekizumab IL-17i groups. CONCLUSIONS: These updated findings with IL-23i data reaffirm that patients with psoriasis who switch to ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic demonstrate improvement in disease severity and patient-reported outcomes at 6 months in real-world settings. Compared to patients who switched from another IL-17i, patients who switched class from a TNFi or IL-12/23i were more likely to achieve PASI100 and IGA 0/1, and patients who switched class from an IL-23i were more likely to achieve PASI90 in addition to PASI100 and IGA 0/1.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Clinical Outcomes, and Symptom Burden in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Prescribed Ixekizumab in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the real-world characteristics and clinical status of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) currently prescribed ixekizumab. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi PsA Plus Disease Specific Programme (DSP), a cross-sectional survey conducted in the United States between September 2021 and March 2022. Rheumatologists provided data for their next five consulting patients currently receiving ixekizumab, including demographic and clinical characteristics, disease severity, treatment history, reasons for treatment choice, satisfaction with current treatment, and current and historic symptom burden. Patients voluntarily completed questionnaires, providing perceptional data on symptom burden and satisfaction with current treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 68 rheumatologists provided data on 275 patients with PsA, 90 of whom completed the voluntary questionnaire. Patients had been prescribed ixekizumab for a mean of 11.7 (SD 10.6) months. Clinical characteristics, disease severity, and symptom burden of patients with PsA improved significantly from ixekizumab initiation to the most recent consultation, including symptom burden, tender and swollen joint counts, and body surface area affected by psoriasis (all P < 0.001). Both rheumatologists and patients were satisfied with ixekizumab treatment and reported improvements in pain and fatigue. Improvements were noted after more than three months of ixekizumab treatment duration and regardless of whether the patients had prior exposure to an advanced therapy or were treatment naïve. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that ixekizumab was efficacious in the treatment of PsA in real-world clinical practice, complementing efficacy data from randomized controlled clinical trials. The results of this study may assist rheumatologists and their patients in making informed treatment choices.

Ixekizumab Demonstrates Rapid and Consistent Efficacy for Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis, Regardless of Psoriasis Severity.

INTRODUCTION: Skin involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) worsens the severity and burden of disease. Ixekizumab (IXE), a selective interleukin (IL)-17A antagonist, was compared to placebo (PBO) in the SPIRIT-P1 (NCT01695239) and SPIRIT-P2 (NCT02349295) studies in patients with PsA and evidence of plaque psoriasis. This post hoc analysis reports musculoskeletal, skin, and nail outcomes through week 24 in patients from SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2, stratified by mild, moderate, or psoriasis at baseline. METHODS: This post hoc analysis pooled patients from SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2 who were randomly assigned to PBO or IXE 80 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 2 weeks (Q2W). Efficacy outcomes were analyzed through week 24 by baseline psoriasis severity, defined by percent body surface area (BSA) affected; mild = BSA < 3%, moderate = 3% ≤ BSA ≤ 10%, severe = BSA > 10%. The primary outcomes assessed were the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses. Secondary outcomes included musculoskeletal, disease activity, skin and nail, and health-related quality-of-life measures. RESULTS: Similar proportions of patients achieved ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 over time across all severity subgroups and treatment arms. More than one-third of IXE-treated patients achieved ACR20 at week 4, or ACR50 at week 24, with no significant differences according to psoriasis severity at baseline. Disease activity outcomes were similar through week 24 with both IXEQ4W and IXEQ2W, regardless of psoriasis severity at baseline. There were no significant differences over 24 weeks in the proportions of IXE-treated patients with mild, moderate, or severe baseline psoriasis who achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA). Across all severity subgroups, IXE demonstrated Psoriasis Area Severity Index 100 response as early as week 4, and approximately one-third of IXE-treated patients achieved total skin clearance at week 24. CONCLUSION: IXE demonstrated rapid and consistent efficacy in joint, skin, and nail for patients with PsA, regardless of baseline psoriasis severity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SPIRIT-P1 (NCT01695239), SPIRIT-P2 (NCT02349295).

Comparing Achievement of National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets among Patients with Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab versus Other Biologics in Clinical and Real-World Studies.

INTRODUCTION: The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) recommends evaluating patient response to treatment at week 12, with a target response of ≤ 1% body surface area (BSA) affected by plaque psoriasis and an acceptable response of BSA ≤ 3% or ≥ 75% improvement. This post hoc analysis compared the achievement of NPF target and acceptable responses for ixekizumab (IXE) versus other biologics. METHODS: Outcomes were evaluated at week 12 for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from four head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs; UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3, IXORA-R, and IXORA-S) and one real-world prospective observational study (Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes; PSoHO). RCT patients were treated with IXE or etanercept (ETN; UNCOVER-2/3), guselkumab (GUS; IXORA-R), or ustekinumab (UST; IXORA-S). PSoHO patients were treated with anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics (IXE, secukinumab, SEC) and other approved biologics for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients with missing outcomes were imputed as non-responder imputation. For RCT data, statistical comparisons between treatment groups were performed using Fisher's exact test with no multiplicity adjustments. For real-world data, adjusted comparative analyses were performed using frequentist model averaging (FMA) and reported as odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Across the four head-to-head clinical trials analyzed, significantly higher proportions of patients achieved target and acceptable responses at week 12 with IXE versus ETN, GUS, or UST. Likewise, the proportion of PSoHO patients achieving target and acceptable response at week 12 was higher with IXE compared with other individual biologics. Adjusted comparative analyses showed that IXE had significantly greater odds of target and acceptable response at week 12 versus SEC, GUS, risankizumab (RIS), adalimumab (ADA), UST, and tildrakizumab (TILD) and numerically greater odds of target and acceptable response at week 12 versus brodalumab (BROD). CONCLUSION: Across both clinical studies and real-world settings, more patients treated with IXE achieved NPF target and acceptable responses at week 12 compared with those treated with other biologics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UNCOVER-2 (NCT01597245); UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177); IXORA-R (NCT03573323); IXORA-S (NCT02561806); PSoHO (EUPAS24207).

Satisfaction with the Injection Experience of a New, Citrate-Free Formulation of Ixekizumab.

INTRODUCTION: A new, citrate-free ixekizumab formulation, which is bioequivalent to the original formulation, was associated with significant reduction in injection site pain. This study evaluates patient satisfaction with the first injection experience of citrate-free ixekizumab in a real-world setting. METHODS: A non-interventional, observational, web-based survey of adults (≥ 18 years) with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis was conducted between August 2022 and March 2023. Patients enrolled in the Taltz US Customer Support Program were identified as receiving either the original ixekizumab or initiating citrate-free ixekizumab. Patients receiving original ixekizumab completed one survey at baseline to assess satisfaction with the formulation and one survey after switching to assess satisfaction, willingness to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab, and formulation preference. Participants previously exposed to ixekizumab completed one survey to assess their satisfaction and willingness to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab. Descriptive and comparative statistics are reported for patients that switched from original to citrate-free ixekizumab (n = 361); and descriptive statistics are reported for patients not previously exposed to ixekizumab (n = 90). RESULTS: A total of 451 patients were included in the analysis. Significantly more patients were satisfied with their first injection with citrate-free ixekizumab compared to original ixekizumab (83.9% vs. 71.7% respectively; p = 0.0001). Almost all patients who switched from original ixekizumab were definitely or mostly willing to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab (93.9% and 93.4%, respectively). Additionally, 94.2% of patients who switched from original to citrate-free ixekizumab preferred citrate-free ixekizumab or had no preference. Three-fourths of patients not previously exposed to ixekizumab were satisfied with their first injection with citrate-free ixekizumab and 94.5% were definitely or mostly willing to continue using citrate-free ixekizumab. CONCLUSION: The citrate-free ixekizumab formulation was preferred and well accepted by most patients who switched from the original ixekizumab formulation. Similar findings were seen for those newly initiating citrate-free ixekizumab.

Effectiveness of bDMARDs in ankylosing spondylitis patients by biologic use: experience from the CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To describe bDMARD initiators by biologic experience among ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and change in disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in real-world US patients. METHODS: We included patients ≥18 years with AS based on physician diagnosis enrolled between 3/2013 and 11/2019 in the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA)/Spondyloarthritis Registry (NCT02530268). Patients concurrently diagnosed with PSA were excluded. Baseline (bDMARD initiation) demographics, comorbidities, disease characteristics, treatment, and PROs were collected. Response rates and changes in disease activity and PROs between baseline and 6- and 12- month follow-up visits were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 489 AS patients in the PsA/SpA Registry, 254 AS (52.0%) patients initiated a bDMARD at enrollment or during follow-up (total initiations: AS = 313). Of the 313 AS initiations, 179 (57.2%) had a 6-month follow-up, 122 (39.0%) had a 12-month follow-up, and 94 (30.0%) had a 6- and 12-month follow-up visit. For those AS initiators with a 6-month follow-up, the mean age was 49.1 years, 44.4% were female, and 70.4%, 47.5%, 96.1%, and 46.9% had never used cDMARDs, TNFis, non-TNFis, and bDMARDs, respectively. Of these 179 AS initiators, 20.1% and 14.0% achieved ASAS20/40, respectively. Further, only 34% achieved low disease activity (ASDAS <2.1). When stratified by biologic-naivete and biologic-experience, the ASAS 20/40 achievement rates were 26.2% and 14.7%, and 21.4% and 7.4%, respectively, for this cohort. CONCLUSION: Although AS patients initiate bDMARDs, many do not achieve optimal treatment responses. Future research is needed to investigate the aspects associated with inadequate improvement and treatment response to bDMARDs.

Ixekizumab Real-World Effectiveness at 24 Weeks in Patients with Psoriasis: Data from the United States Taltz Customer Support Program.

INTRODUCTION: Ixekizumab, a highly selective interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, was approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) in 2016. Limited real-world data are available on its effectiveness from a patient's perspective shortly (2 to 4 weeks) after initiation and upon continuation for 24 weeks. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient-reported clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after initiating ixekizumab using data collected from the United States Taltz® Customer Support Program. METHODS: This was a 24-week prospective, observational study of commercially insured diagnosis-confirmed adults with PsO. Surveys were completed at weeks 0 (baseline), 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 and included the Patient Report of Extent of Psoriasis Involvement questionnaire to assess the extent of body surface area (BSA) affected by PsO, itch and pain numeric rating scales, Patient Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). RESULTS: 523 patients were included in the analysis. Proportions of patients with ≤ 2% BSA involvement were 34.5%, 40.1%, 50.9%, and 79.9% at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 24, respectively; 54.8% and 75.1% achieved National Psoriasis Foundation preferred (BSA ≤ 1%) and acceptable (BSA ≤ 3% or ≥ 75% improvement) responses at week 12, respectively. Improvements of ≥ 4 points in itch and pain were seen by week 2 in 21.1% and 28.0% of patients, respectively, which increased to 63.1% and 64.8% at week 24. Proportions of patients with PatGA scores of 0 (clear) or 1 were 13.4%, 24.1%, 34.0%, and 69.6% at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 24, respectively; and proportions with DLQI total scores of 0 or 1 [no or minimal impact] were 8.4%, 17.6%, 27.3%, and 53.8% at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 24, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported improvements in BSA, itch, skin pain, dermatology-specific quality of life, and overall PsO severity were seen as early as 2 weeks after initiation and continued through week 24.

Outcomes in Ixekizumab Patients Following Exposure to Secukinumab and Other Biologics in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to describe real-world biologic-experienced psoriasis patients initiating ixekizumab by prior biologic therapy status and compare the effectiveness of ixekizumab between patients who previously failed secukinumab and those who failed other biologics. We hypothesized that (1) clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes would improve following a switch to IXE, and (2) there would be no differences in responses between patients who previously failed secukinumab and those who failed other biologics. METHODS: Participants (n = 419) included adult psoriasis patients enrolled in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry through 9/10/20 who switched to ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic. Patients were classified by the biologic used immediately prior to ixekizumab and reason for discontinuation: prior secukinumab failure; prior secukinumab non-failure; prior other biologic failure; and prior other biologic non-failure. Discontinuations for efficacy reasons were considered failures; all others were considered non-failures. Baseline descriptive statistics were calculated. Multivariable Poisson regression models estimated the likelihood of response of other failure relative to secukinumab failure. RESULTS: Mean age was 51 years; 48% were women. Psoriasis disease characteristics were similar across prior biologic groups. At 6-month follow-up, disease severity improved for all who initiated ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic. Secukinumab failure patients who switched to ixekizumab achieved BSA ≤ 1 (49%), BSA ≤ 3 (59%), PASI75 (46%), PASI ≤ 3 (64%), and IGA ≤ 1 (40%). Other failure patients achieved BSA ≤ 1 (55%), BSA ≤ 3 (72%), PASI75 (59%), PASI ≤ 3 (74%), and IGA ≤ 1 (54%). In regression modeling, we observed patients in the other biologics failure group had an increased likelihood of achieving response for BSA ≤ 3, PASI75, PASI90, PASI100, and IGA ≤ 1 compared to patients who failed secukinumab. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that patients with psoriasis who switch to ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic demonstrate improvement in disease severity after six months. Patients who discontinued biologics other than secukinumab may be more likely to respond to ixekiziumab compared to those who switched from secukinumab.

Real-World Biologic Adherence, Persistence, and Monotherapy Comparisons in US Patients with Psoriasis: Results from IBM MarketScan® Databases.

INTRODUCTION: Limited real-world data are available comparing multiple biologics on their adherence, persistence, and the use of concomitant biologics in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in clinical practice. The objective was to compare persistence of and adherence to ixekizumab (IXE) treatment, as monotherapy or with concomitant medication, versus patients receiving other commonly prescribed biologics. METHODS: Patients who newly initiated IXE, adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETN), secukinumab (SEC), or ustekinumab (UST) in IBM MarketScan® databases with diagnosis of psoriasis were identified. Treatment comparisons on medication persistence, adherence, and monotherapy were based on balanced samples after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: A higher proportion of patients receiving IXE had had previous biologic therapies (50.3%) versus other biologics (ADA: 9.1%, ETN: 10.9%, SEC: 33.9%, UST: 19.7%). Patients treated with IXE showed statistically (p < 0.001) greater persistence than patients treated with SEC, ADA, UST, or ETN at both 1-year follow-up and up to 3 years of follow-up. Adherence for patients treated with IXE was significantly (p < 0.001) higher compared to ADA, ETN, and UST at both 1-year follow-up and up to 3 years of follow-up. There was no significantly higher adherence in patients treated with IXE compared to those treated with SEC at 1-year follow-up, but IXE had higher adherence than SEC (p < 0.05) at 1-3 year follow-up. IXE showed longer time on monotherapy than ADA (p < 0.001), ETN (p < 0.001), SEC (p < 0.05), and UST (p < 0.001) for both 1-year and 1-3 year follow-up. Sensitivity analyses on persistence, adherence, and monotherapy with further model adjustments after IPTW confirmed the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with IXE were more persistent on and adherent to treatment and remained on monotherapy longer compared to those on all other commonly prescribed biologics combined or with individual biologics.

A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Treatment Patterns Over 1 Year in Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab or Guselkumab.

INTRODUCTION: Persistence and adherence to psoriasis treatments reflect overall drug effectiveness, tolerability, and convenience. Limited data are available on the treatment patterns of ixekizumab, an interleukin (IL)-17A antagonist, vs. guselkumab, an IL-23 inhibitor. Our objective was to evaluate real-life psoriasis drug treatment patterns with ixekizumab vs. guselkumab. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used United States insurance claims data from IBM Watson MarketScan Databases to analyze treatment patterns (including adherence, persistence, time on monotherapy, switching, and use of concomitant medications) for patients with 1 year, ≥ 6 months, and up to 30 months of follow-up. Outcomes were compared between ixekizumab and guselkumab on the balanced sample after applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: Data for 1414 eligible patients (ixekizumab, N = 674 and guselkumab, N = 740) were assessed. Over the 1-year follow-up, adherence was greater for ixekizumab vs. guselkumab when evaluated by proportion of days covered ≥ 80% [odds ratio (OR) 1.77 (95% confidence interval, 1.41, 2.21), p < 0.001] and by medication possession ratio ≥ 80% [OR = 1.92 (1.54, 2.38), p < 0.001]. Persistence was longer for ixekizumab vs. guselkumab with a 60-day allowable gap [non-persistence hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval): 0.80 (0.69, 0.93), p = 0.005], but there were no differences with a 90-day allowable gap [HR = 0.98 (0.83, 1.17), p = 0.850]. Results assessed in patients with ≥ 6 months follow-up confirmed these findings. This retrospective analysis of a United States claims database used prescription refill data to estimate persistence/adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Based on real-world evidence using claims data, patients with psoriasis treated with ixekizumab had a greater adherence to and an equal or greater persistence with therapy vs. patients treated with guselkumab.

In real-world settings, how consistently patients take a drug (adherence) and how long they continue taking it (persistence) are thought to reflect patients' satisfaction with the combination of efficacy and tolerability of the treatment. In this study of patients with psoriasis, we compared these measures­regularity of prescription refills and continued time on drug­between patients receiving ixekizumab or guselkumab for their psoriasis. This information was taken from a large insurance claims database, and so reflects results among commercially insured patients in the United States. We found that patients taking ixekizumab more consistently obtained prescription refills during the study period. Patients taking ixekizumab or guselkumab continued treatment for similar lengths of time when we allowed a longer gap of 90 days between prescription refills, but when a shorter gap of 60 days was allowed, those on ixekizumab spent a longer time on treatment. The findings were consistent regardless of prior treatment with other similar drugs (biologics). Overall, these findings indicate that for ixekizumab, which is dosed once every 4 weeks, and guselkumab, which is dosed once every 8 weeks, patients took ixekizumab more regularly and continued on the drug for about the same or a longer amount of time compared to patients taking guselkumab. These results may help dermatology practitioners in selecting biologic drugs for their patients with psoriasis.

Employment, Work Productivity, and Biologic Treatments in Self-Reported Axial Spondyloarthritis: a Cross-Sectional Study in a Female Predominant Population from the ArthritisPower Registry.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to characterize employment, work productivity, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment in a predominantly female population of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of axSpA participants within the ArthritisPower registry. Outcomes were assessed with surveys (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI], Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments) and compared between subgroups (employed vs. not employed; taking vs. not taking a bDMARD). RESULTS: Among the 195 participants, 117 (60.0%) were employed and 78 (40.0%) were not employed entirely or partially due to axSpA. The mean age of the participants was 47.6 years and 86.7% were female. Current bDMARD use was reported by 57.4% of those surveyed (59.8% employed vs. 53.9% not employed; p = 0.408). Compared to not employed participants, employed participants had more favorable disease activity (BASDAI 6.0 vs. 7.6; p < 0.001) and overall health (self-rated health 2.5 vs. 1.8; p < 0.001). Employed participants, compared to not employed participants, were diagnosed at an earlier age (36.0 vs. 42.5 years, respectively) and experienced a shorter time between symptom onset and diagnosis (9.5 vs. 13.6 years, respectively). Employed participants reported missing on average 6.5 days of work and experienced a 52.7% impairment on work productivity due to axSpA over a 3-month period. Absenteeism and presenteeism were statistically similar between participants taking a bDMARD versus those not taking a bDMARD. CONCLUSIONS: Although bDMARD treatment rates were similar between employed and not employed participants, disease activity and overall health were better in employed than non-employed participants. Employed participants experienced substantial work productivity impairment due to axSpA.

Treatment patterns and health care costs among patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

BACKGROUND: Biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARD) therapies are used in management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Although previous studies have demonstrated that rates of adherence, persistence, discontinuation, and switching, as well as health care costs, are variable among treatments, limited published data exist on more recently approved therapies. OBJECTIVE: To describe adherence, persistence, discontinuation, reinitiation, switching, dosing patterns, and health care costs among PsA patients treated with biologics and tsDMARDs. METHODS: This was a real-world, retrospective administrative claims study. Adult PsA patients with at least 1 claim for an approved PsA biologic (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, or ustekinumab) or tsDMARD (apremilast or tofacitinib) between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019, were selected from the IBM MarketScan administrative claims databases. The first claim for one of the study treatments determined the index date and drug cohort. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled in their health plans for 12 months before and after the index date and to have at least 1 claim with a diagnosis of PsA in the 12 months before or on the index date. Adherence (measured by proportion of days covered [PDC] and medication possession ratio [MPR]), persistence (< 60-day gap in treatment), discontinuation (> 90-day gap), reinitiation of index drug, switching, and dosing patterns for each index drug were assessed during the 12-month follow-up period. Health care costs were reported per patient per month (PPPM) during the 12-month follow-up and assessed after adjusting PsA treatment costs by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review discount factors to account for discounts and rebates not usually reflected in claims data and by adherence. RESULTS: Overall, 6,674 patients met the selection criteria. The top 3 index drugs were adalimumab (37%), apremilast (26%), and etanercept (18%). Over 12 months of follow-up, 31%-59% of patients remained persistent on the index drug, whereas 35%-56% discontinued, 13%-29% switched to a different biologic or tsDMARD, and 3%-15% reinitiated the index therapy, depending on the index drug. The mean PDC ranged from 0.51 to 0.69 during the 12-month follow-up and 0.80 to 0.93 during the follow-up period before discontinuation. Dose values were largely consistent with prescribing information, with the exception of secukinumab. Index drug costs PPPM ranged from $2,361 (apremilast) to $6,528 for ustekinumab after adjustment for discounts and adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this real-world analysis suggest that there is substantial variability in persistence, discontinuation, adherence, reinitiating, and switching patterns among the different biologic and tsDMARD treatment options for PsA patients. In addition, this study provides real-world cost data for biologics and tsDMARDs among patients with PsA. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly Inc., which participated in analysis and interpretation of data, drafting, reviewing, and approving the publication. All authors contributed to the development of the publication and maintained control over the final content. Murage, Malatestinic, Zhu, Atiya, Kern, Stenger, and Sprabery are employees and stockholders of Eli Lilly Inc. Princic and Park are employed by IBM Watson Health, which received funding from Eli Lilly Inc. to conduct this study. Ogdie has received consulting fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corrona, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer and has also received grant support from Pfizer, Novartis, and Amgen. Portions of these data have been presented in poster form at the virtual International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 2020 and Congress of Clinical Rheumatology (CCR) West 2020 conferences.

Disease response and patient-reported outcomes among initiators of ixekizumab.

OBJECTIVES: There is limited real-world evidence on using ixekizumab in psoriasis patients. Therefore, we characterized patients with psoriasis initiating ixekizumab and report 6-month changes in disease and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients with psoriasis who initiated ixekizumab and completed a 6-month follow-up visit were enrolled from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. Disease characteristics and outcomes were assessed at ixekizumab initiation. Outcomes included the mean 6-month change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and IGA*BSA. RESULTS: From baseline to follow-up in all patients (n = 136), means decreased for IGA*BSA (-45.5) and BSA (-12.4), and a higher % achieved an absolute PASI ≤ 5 (84.6%), BSA 0-3 (72.1%), and IGA 0/1 (50.7%). Within stratified groups, means decreased for PASI <12 for IGA*BSA (-21.1) and BSA (-6.3); PASI≥12 for IGA*BSA (-94.8) and BSA (-24.6); weight <100 kg for IGA*BSA (-45.1) and BSA (-12.4); weight ≥100 kg for IGA*BSA (-46.2) and BSA (-12.3); concomitant PsA for IGA*BSA (-56.0) and BSA (-15.3); and in no concomitant PsA for IGA*BSA (-36.9) and BSA (-10.0). CONCLUSIONS: We provide real-world evidence on the benefits of ixekizumab for treating psoriasis, regardless of baseline disease severity, weight, or concomitant PsA.

Assessment of the benefit of achieving complete versus almost complete skin clearance in psoriasis: a patient's perspective.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is characterized by thick and scaly plaques. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) can be used to define its severity. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of complete clearance of skin versus almost clear skin across various disease measures. METHODS: Data were collected in a survey of US dermatologists and patients with psoriasis from November 2016-January 2017. Dermatologists completed a 6-point PGA (0 = clear skin, 1 = almost clear skin). Patients completed the DLQI and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Patients with clear and almost clear skin were compared using analysis of covariance for continuous variables, and multivariate logistic regression analysis for categorical variables. RESULTS: Data for 99 and 160 patients with clear and almost clear skin, respectively, were included in the analyses. Patients with clear skin reported less frequent and lower intensity itching, lower total DLQI score (indicating better health-related quality of life), and less impairment of overall work productivity than patients with almost clear skin (all: p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: Limitations relating to general survey methodology. CONCLUSION: Patients perceived a meaningful difference between clear and almost clear skin. Clear skin is now a realistic treatment target with newer biologics approved in psoriasis.

The current treatment landscape in adult atopic dermatitis in the United States: results from a cross-sectional real-world study.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the current treatment landscape in adult atopic dermatitis (AD), overall and by disease severity. METHODS: Adult patients with an AD diagnosis in dermatology-specific electronic medical records during 2018 were identified and linked to an administrative claims database. Disease severity was determined using Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Written and dispensed prescriptions, within and between class cycling for AD therapies occurring in 2018 were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 4,364 patients were included. Among patients with available PGA, 43.2% had clear-to-mild, 37.3% had moderate, and 19.6% had severe disease. Most patients (71.0%) had written prescriptions for topical therapies only in 2018. Among the patients with claims for topical therapies alone, 80.7% used topical corticosteroids only. Within and between class cycling was observed in 33.7% and 12.8% of topical users, respectively. In patients with systemic therapy (40.6%), nearly 84.9% also used topical therapy, 25.8% cycled within systemic drug classes, and 24.8% cycled between systemic drug classes. Overall, cycling was more prevalent in patients with more severe disease. CONCLUSION: Cycling within and between both topical and systemic drug classes was more common in patients with more severe disease, indicating difficulty of managing these patients and highlighting a need for more treatment options.

Inadequate response and treatment patterns in adults diagnosed with atopic dermatitis and treated with topical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) is complex, particularly in patients with inadequate response to topical therapies. Currently, there is little clinical guidance for the treatment of these patients. METHODS: A real-world retrospective study utilizing electronic medical records (EMR) and administrative claims data selected patients with AD between January 01 2016 and June 30 2018. Patients had a written prescription for a topical therapy (first observed script = index date) and no prior systemic treatment. Disease severity at index, follow-up treatment response and prescriptions patterns were assessed. A subset of patients linked to claims was evaluated for treatment patterns. RESULTS: We identified 137,214 adult topical-treated AD patients with no prior systemic therapy. Among the 16,035 patients with available Physician Global Assessment (PGA) at index, 8169 (50.9%) had the moderate-to-severe disease. Among these patients, 60% had an inadequate response to topical therapy. Of 4475 patients linked to claims, 13.0% had claims for systemic therapy during follow-up, most initiated systemic steroids (95.2%), and oral immunosuppressants and biologics were initiated in 3.3% and 3.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, inadequate response to topical therapy among moderate-to-severe AD patients was high and initiation of systemic treatment was low which suggests a need for additional AD-indicated systemic treatment options in this patient population.

Psoriasis treatment patterns and outcomes with ixekizumab in a real-world setting: results from a single US dermatology referral practice.

OBJECTIVE: To assess treatment patterns of Ixekizumab (IXE) and evaluate the speed of onset and long-term clinical and quality-of-life outcomes among a subset of patients who switched from adalimumab (ADA) and secukinumab (SEC) to IXE in a real-world setting. METHOD: A retrospective chart review study was conducted at a single US dermatology referral center. RESULT: 153 patients were included in the study, 69.3% of patients were biologic-experienced. ADA was the most commonly used biologic prior to IXE initiation. 66.7% of patients remained on IXE at the study end. 47.7% of patients received concomitant methotrexate, and usage decreased consistently after 1 month. IXE treatment duration was longer among patients who were early responders (achieved sPGA (0,1) at 1 month) vs. non-early responders. 69.4% and 43.3% of patients who switched from ADA and SEC to IXE achieved sPGA (0,1) by week 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who switched to IXE, specifically from ADA or SEC, had rapid treatment response as well as desirable long-term outcomes. IXE persistence was longer among early responders than non-early responders. Concomitant usage of methotrexate prior to switching to IXE and as a concomitant bridging treatment was reduced after IXE initiation while the proportion of patients achieving treatment targets remained high.

Treatment Satisfaction and Decision-making from the Patient Perspective in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Real-World Data from a Descriptive Cross-sectional Survey Study from the ArthritisPower Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Aims were to 1) to characterize patient decision-making with treatment for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and 2) to explore relationships among decision-making, treatment satisfaction, and biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: ArthritisPower participants with physician-diagnosed axSpA were invited to complete an online survey about their treatment and their most recent physician visit. Analysis compared treatment decision by satisfaction and bDMARD status. RESULTS: Among the 274 participants, 87.2% were female, and the mean age was 50 years. Of participants, 79.5% had researched treatment before their most recent physician visit, and 56.9% discussed treatment change at their most recent physician visit. Of treatment-change discussions, 69.2% of them were related to escalation, compared with deescalation (27.6%) and/or switching (39.1%). Among those participants who discussed a change, 73.7% agreed to it because they felt that their disease was not being controlled (54.9%) or felt that it could be better controlled on new treatment (20.3%). Top symptoms prompting change were back/buttock pain (63.3%), other joint pain (55.1%), and fatigue (54.1%). Among bDMARD-treated participants (n = 128), important factors for treatment decisions were prevention of long-term axSpA consequences (92.9%) and doctor's advice (87.5%). Among 43.4% of participants reporting treatment dissatisfaction, 37% did not discuss treatment change. Current bDMARD use was more common in satisfied (61.9%) than dissatisfied participants (26.9%). CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study of a predominantly female axSpA population, patients frequently researched treatment options and discussed escalation with their providers. Under two-thirds of participants who were dissatisfied with treatment discussed changes at their most recent visit. Current bDMARD use was associated with higher satisfaction, and bDMARD users considered prevention of long-term consequences and doctor's advice to be very important for decision-making.