Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urology ; 164: 248-253, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35278492

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report our contemporary experience with ureteral injuries secondary to blunt trauma, with diagnostic methods and management stratified according to injury severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective 15-year study (4/2005-4/2020) at a regional level I trauma center. Patients were categorized as having a partial or complete transection injury. Treatment success was defined as the absence of hydronephrosis or obstruction on follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Eighteen patients suffered 10 partial and 9 complete ureteral transections. All 16 patients who underwent initial evaluation with computed tomography were correctly graded as having partial or complete transections, and there were no missed injuries. Treatment of partial transections included observation (3/9), retrograde double-J stent placement (4/9), and Heineke-Mikulicz pyeloplasty (2/9). At a median follow-up of 9 (IQR 2-59) months, 8/9 (89%) partial transections were treated successfully. Treatment of complete transections included pyeloplasty (3/9), ureteroureterostomy (4/9), and ureteroneocystostomy (1/9). One patient who underwent attempted reconstruction 6 days after trauma required nephrectomy. At a median follow-up of 32 (IQR 4-82) months, 7/8 (89%) reconstructed complete transections were treated successfully. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography with delayed phase imaging is a sensitive test to detect ureteral injuries after blunt trauma, and computed tomography can distinguish between partial and complete transections. Partial transection injuries secondary to blunt trauma may be amenable to ureteral stent placement or close observation in select cases. Good intermediate-term outcomes can be achieved with early surgical intervention in the case of complete transections.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía
2.
World J Urol ; 40(6): 1569-1574, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35355102

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe a systematic method to quantify the severity of renal infarction injury and assess its association with post-traumatic renal function after blunt trauma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who suffered an AAST grade IV renal infarction injury without active bleeding secondary to blunt trauma between 1/2010 and 10/2020. Only patients with a pre-traumatic eGFR within 12 months of injury and post-traumatic eGFR within 3-12 months were included. Percentage of renal ischemia was defined as: (ischemic volume/total volume) × 100%. Two radiologists reviewed computed tomography images to determine ischemic and overall cross-sectional areas using the polygon region of interest tool. These areas were multiplied by slice thickness to obtain ischemic and total volumes. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess consistency between radiologists. Linear regression analyses were used to assess the association between percentage of renal ischemia and post-traumatic renal function. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 140 (25.0%) patients met inclusion criteria. The median (IQR) pre-trauma eGFR was 107.7 ml/min/1.73m2 (90.6-121.8), percentage of renal ischemia was 8.4% (2.9-30.1), and decrease in eGFR after trauma was 12.9 ml/min/1.73m2 (0.4-32.6). There was excellent reliability in calculating ischemic volume (ICC = 0.987) and total kidney volume (ICC = 0.995) between two radiologists. When adjusting for pre-traumatic eGFR, patient age, and injury severity score, a 10% increase in ischemic volume was associated with a post-injury eGFR value that was 8.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI - 11.2, - 4.7) lower. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based volume calculation of renal ischemia may be utilized to quantify kidney injury and be associated with post-traumatic renal function loss.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Enfermedades Renales , Enfermedades Ureterales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Infarto/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto/etiología , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/lesiones , Riñón/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
3.
BMJ ; 357: j1456, 2017 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28424154

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the association between active commuting and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and all cause mortality.Design Prospective population based study. Setting UK Biobank.Participants 263 450 participants (106 674 (52%) women; mean age 52.6), recruited from 22 sites across the UK. The exposure variable was the mode of transport used (walking, cycling, mixed mode v non-active (car or public transport)) to commute to and from work on a typical day.Main outcome measures Incident (fatal and non-fatal) CVD and cancer, and deaths from CVD, cancer, or any causes.Results 2430 participants died (496 were related to CVD and 1126 to cancer) over a median of 5.0 years (interquartile range 4.3-5.5) follow-up. There were 3748 cancer and 1110 CVD events. In maximally adjusted models, commuting by cycle and by mixed mode including cycling were associated with lower risk of all cause mortality (cycling hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.83, P=0.002; mixed mode cycling 0.76, 0.58 to 1.00, P<0.05), cancer incidence (cycling 0.55, 0.44 to 0.69, P<0.001; mixed mode cycling 0.64, 0.45 to 0.91, P=0.01), and cancer mortality (cycling 0.60, 0.40 to 0.90, P=0.01; mixed mode cycling 0.68, 0.57 to 0.81, P<0.001). Commuting by cycling and walking were associated with a lower risk of CVD incidence (cycling 0.54, 0.33 to 0.88, P=0.01; walking 0.73, 0.54 to 0.99, P=0.04) and CVD mortality (cycling 0.48, 0.25 to 0.92, P=0.03; walking 0.64, 0.45 to 0.91, P=0.01). No statistically significant associations were observed for walking commuting and all cause mortality or cancer outcomes. Mixed mode commuting including walking was not noticeably associated with any of the measured outcomes.Conclusions Cycle commuting was associated with a lower risk of CVD, cancer, and all cause mortality. Walking commuting was associated with a lower risk of CVD independent of major measured confounding factors. Initiatives to encourage and support active commuting could reduce risk of death and the burden of important chronic conditions.


Asunto(s)
Ciclismo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Transportes/métodos , Caminata , Adulto , Anciano , Ciclismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Reino Unido , Caminata/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...