Physical Health-Related Quality of Life Improves over Time in Post-COVID-19 Patients: An Exploratory Prospective Study.

(1) Background: Ongoing symptoms after mild or moderate acute coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) substantially affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, follow-up data on HRQoL are scarce. We characterized the change in HRQoL over time in post-COVID-19 patients who initially suffered from mild or moderate acute COVID-19 without hospitalization. (2) Methods: Outpatients who visited an interdisciplinary post-COVID-19 consultation at the University Hospital Zurich and suffered from ongoing symptoms after acute COVID-19 were included in this observational study. HRQoL was assessed using established questionnaires. Six months after baseline, the same questionnaires and a self-constructed questionnaire about the COVID-19 vaccination were distributed. (3) Results: In total, 69 patients completed the follow-up, of whom 55 (80%) were female. The mean (SD) age was 44 (12) years and the median (IQR) time from symptom onset to completing the follow-up was 326 (300, 391) days. The majority of patients significantly improved in EQ-5D-5L health dimensions of mobility, usual activities, pain and anxiety. Furthermore, according to the SF-36, patients showed clinically relevant improvements in physical health, whereas no significant change was found regarding mental health. (4) Conclusions: Physical aspects of HRQoL in post-COVID-19 patients relevantly improved over 6 months. Future studies are needed to focus on potential predictors that allow for establishing individual care and early interventions.

Impaired health-related quality of life in long-COVID syndrome after mild to moderate COVID-19.

A growing number of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections experience long-lasting symptoms. Even patients who suffered from a mild acute infection show a variety of persisting and debilitating neurocognitive, respiratory, or cardiac symptoms (Long-Covid syndrome), consequently leading to limitations in everyday life. Because data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is scarce, we aimed to characterize the impact of Long-Covid symptoms after a mild or moderate acute infection on HRQoL. In this observational study, outpatients seeking counseling in the interdisciplinary Post-Covid consultation of the University Hospital Zurich with symptoms persisting for more than 4 weeks were included. Patients who received an alternative diagnosis or suffered from a severe acute Covid-19 infection were excluded. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Euroquol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), and the Short form 36 (SF-36) were distributed to assess HRQoL. 112 patients were included, 86 (76.8%) were female, median (IQR) age was 43 (32.0, 52.5) years with 126 (91, 180) days of symptoms. Patients suffered frequently from fatigue (81%), concentration difficulties (60%), and dyspnea (60%). Patients mostly stated impairment in performing usual activities and having pain/discomfort or anxiety out of the EQ-5D-5L. EQ index value and SGRQ activity score component were significantly lower in females. SF-36 scores showed remarkably lower scores in the physical health domain compared to the Swiss general population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Long-Covid syndrome has a substantial impact on HRQoL. Long-term surveillance of patients must provide clarity on the duration of impairments in physical and mental health.Trial registration: The study is registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04793269.

Chest CT Findings after Mild COVID-19 Do Not Explain Persisting Respiratory Symptoms: An Explanatory Study.

(1) Background: Lung tissue involvement is frequently observed in acute COVID-19. However, it is unclear whether CT findings at follow-up are associated with persisting respiratory symptoms after initial mild or moderate infection. (2) Methods: Chest CTs of patients with persisting respiratory symptoms referred to the post-COVID-19 outpatient clinic were reassessed for parenchymal changes, and their potential association was evaluated. (3) Results: A total of 53 patients (31 female) with a mean (SD) age of 46 (13) years were included, of whom 89% had mild COVID-19. Median (quartiles) time from infection to CT was 139 (86, 189) days. Respiratory symptoms were dyspnea (79%), cough (42%), and thoracic pain (64%). Furthermore, 30 of 53 CTs showed very discrete and two CTs showed medium parenchymal abnormalities. No severe findings were observed. Mosaic attenuation (40%), ground glass opacity (2%), and fibrotic-like changes (25%) were recorded. No evidence for an association between persisting respiratory symptoms and chest CT findings was found. (4) Conclusions: More than half of the patients with initially mild or moderate infection showed findings on chest CT at follow-up. Respiratory symptoms, however, were not related to any chest CT finding. We, therefore, do not suggest routine chest CT follow-up in this patient group if no other indications are given.

Mapping the landscape of lung cancer breath analysis: A scoping review (ELCABA).

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide due to its late-stage detection. Lung cancer screening, including low-dose computed tomography (low-dose CT), provides an initial clinical solution. Nevertheless, further innovations and refinements would help to alleviate remaining limitations. The non-invasive, gentle, and fast nature of breath analysis (BA) makes this technology highly attractive to supplement low-dose CT for an improved screening algorithm. However, BA has not taken hold in everyday clinical practice. One reason might be the heterogeneity and variety of BA methods. This scoping review is a comprehensive summary of study designs, breath analytical methods, and suggested biomarkers in lung cancer. Furthermore, this synthesis provides a framework with core outcomes for future studies in lung cancer BA. This work supports future research for evidence synthesis, meta-analysis, and translation into clinical routine workflows.

Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Disrupts Vigilance-State-Dependent Metabolism.

The direct pathophysiological effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been well described. However, the systemic and metabolic consequences of OSA are less well understood. The aim of this secondary analysis was to translate recent findings in healthy subjects on vigilance-state-dependent metabolism into the context of OSA patients and answer the question of how symptomatic OSA influences metabolism and whether these changes might explain metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of OSA. Patients with suspected OSA were assigned according to their oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score into symptomatic OSA and controls. Vigilance-state-dependent breath metabolites assessed by high-resolution mass spectrometry were used to test for a difference in both groups. In total, 44 patients were eligible, of whom 18 (40.9%) were assigned to the symptomatic OSA group. Symptomatic OSA patients with a median [25%, 75% quartiles] ODI of 40.5 [35.0, 58.8] events/h and an ESS of 14.0 [11.2, 15.8] showed moderate to strong evidence for differences in 18 vigilance-state-dependent breath compounds compared to controls. These identified metabolites are part of major metabolic pathways in carbohydrate, amino acid, and lipid metabolism. Thus, beyond hypoxia per se, we hypothesize that disturbed sleep in OSA patients persists as disturbed sleep-dependent metabolite levels during daytime.

Validating Discriminative Signatures for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Exhaled Breath.

Rapid and reliable tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are currently lacking. Prior studies using a chemical analysis of exhaled breath have suggested the existence of an OSA-specific metabolic signature. Here, we validated this diagnostic approach and the proposed marker compounds, as well as their potential to reliably diagnose OSA. In this cross-sectional observational study, exhaled breath was analyzed using secondary electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry. The study cohort included untreated OSA patients, OSA patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure and healthy subjects. The robustness of previously reported OSA markers was validated based on detectability, significant differences between groups (Mann-Whitney U test) and classification performance. The breath analysis of 118 participants resulted in 42 previously reported markers that could be confirmed in this independent validation cohort. Nine markers were significantly increased in untreated OSA compared to treated OSA, with a subset of them being consistent with a previous validation study. An OSA prediction based on the confirmed OSA signature performed with an AUC of 0.80 (accuracy 77%, sensitivity 73% and specificity 80%). As several breath markers were clearly found to be repeatable and robust in this independent validation study, these results underscore the clinical potential of breath analysis for OSA diagnostics and monitoring.

The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in sarcoidosis and its impact on sleepiness, fatigue, and sleep-associated quality of life: a cross-sectional study with matched controls (the OSASA study).

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Patients with sarcoidosis experience fatigue and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). However, the underlying pathomechanism is unclear. Studies suggested undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) to be an important contributor, but reliable data on prevalence and impact of OSA in sarcoidosis are scarce. METHODS: 71 adult patients with sarcoidosis, 1-to-1 matched to 71 adult controls according to sex, age, and body mass index were included. Participants underwent structured interviews (including Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], Fatigue Assessment Scale [FAS], and Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ-30]) and level-3 respiratory polygraphy. OSA was defined as apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5 events/h. Prevalence of OSA was assessed and possible risk factors for OSA in sarcoidosis were investigated. RESULTS: Mild OSA (AHI ≥ 5 events/h) was prevalent in 32 (45%) sarcoidosis patients vs 22 (31%) controls (P = .040). Sarcoidosis patients presented higher ESS compared with matched controls (P = .037). FAS scores (median [quartile] of 21.5 [16, 27.5]) indicated fatigue in sarcoidosis patients. Patients with EDS (ESS ≥ 11) presented reduced FOSQ-30 results (median [quartile] of 16.7 [15.2, 17.8]). ESS, FAS, and FOSQ were not associated with AHI in sarcoidosis patients. Body mass index, sex, neck circumference, and NoSAS score were predictors for OSA in sarcoidosis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk for mild OSA is 2.5-fold higher in sarcoidosis patients compared with matched controls. OSA seems not to be the reason for increased sleepiness or fatigue in sarcoidosis. Risk factors such as body mass index, sex, neck circumference, and NoSAS score can be used to screen for OSA in sarcoidosis patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in Sarcoidosis (OSASA); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT04156789?V_2=View; Identifier: NCT04156789. CITATION: Roeder M, Sievi NA, Schneider A, et al. The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in sarcoidosis and its impact on sleepiness, fatigue, and sleep-associated quality of life: a cross-sectional study with matched controls (the OSASA study). J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(10):2415-2422.

Augmentation Index in Patients with Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) may be associated with complications such as rupture and dissection, which can lead to a fatal outcome. Increased central arterial stiffness has been proposed to be present in patients with TAA compared to unmatched controls. We aimed to assess whether wall properties in patients with TAA are also altered when compared to a matched control group. Applanation tonometry was performed in 74 adults with TAA and 74 sex, age, weight, height, and left ventricular ejection fraction matched controls. Subsequently analysis of the pulse wave was done using the SphygmoCor System. For comparing the two groups, AIx was adjusted to a heart rate of 75/min (AIx@75). 148 1-to-1 matched participants were included in the final model. There was no significant difference in the Alx@75 between the TAA group and the matched control group [mean (SD) of 24.7 (11.2) % and 22.8 (11.2) %, p = 0.240]. Adjusted for known cardiovascular risk factors, there was no association between TAA and AIx@75. Patients with TAA showed comparable arterial wall properties to cardiovascular risk factor matched controls. Since higher arterial stiffness is associated with TAA progression, it remains to be investigated if increased central arterial stiffness is a relevant factor of TAA emergence.