Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Primatol ; 85(11): e23554, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771291

RESUMEN

Demand for nonhuman primates in research has increased over the past several years, while nonhuman primate supply remains a challenge in the United States. Global nonhuman primate supply issues make it increasingly important to maximize domestic colony production. To explore how housing conditions across primate breeding colonies impact infant survival and animal production more broadly, we collected medical records from 7959 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and 492 pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) across seven breeding facilities and used generalized mixed-effect modeling to determine prenatal and infant survival odds by housing type and group size. Infant survival odds for each housing type and group size varied for prenatal, neonatal, early infant, and late infant age groups. Odds of prenatal survival were lowest in paired indoor housing and small and medium outdoor groups. No housing type performed better than large outdoor groups for neonatal survival. Odds of early infant survival was greatest in indoor and mixed indoor/outdoor housing compared to large outdoor enclosures. Large outdoor housing was associated with higher survival odds for late infant survival compared to small and medium outdoor housing. These results may influence housing choices at macaque breeding facilities hoping to maximize infant success, although there are relative care costs, the promotion of species-typical behaviors, and infrastructure factors to also consider. Our study used an interinstitutional collaboration that allowed for the analysis of more infant macaque medical records than ever before and used the broad variations across the seven national primate research centers to make the results applicable to many other facilities housing macaques.


Asunto(s)
Cruzamiento , Vivienda para Animales , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Animales , Macaca mulatta , Macaca nemestrina
2.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses ; 37(7): 505-509, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356854

RESUMEN

Coccidioidomycosis is a common fungal infection in people living with HIV-1, particularly in southwest regions of the United States where the Coccidioides sp. is endemic, but rates of infection have significantly declined in the era of potent combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Natural coccidioidomycosis also occurs in outdoor-housed macaques residing in the southwestern states that are utilized in biomedical research. Here, we report on a recrudescent case of previously treated, naturally occurring coccidioidomycosis in a pigtail macaque that was experimentally infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and virally suppressed on cART. Coccidioides IgG antibody titer became detectable before discontinuation of cART, but symptomatic coccidioidomycosis developed subsequent to cART withdrawal. This animal was screened and treated in accordance with the guidelines for the prevention and treatment of coccidioidomycosis, suggesting that macaques with a history of coccidioidomycosis should be excluded from enrollment in HIV studies. Continual monitoring for known endemic pathogens based on the colony of origin is also recommended for animals utilized for HIV/AIDS research.


Asunto(s)
Coccidioidomicosis , Infecciones por VIH , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida del Simio , Virus de la Inmunodeficiencia de los Simios , Animales , Coccidioidomicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Macaca nemestrina , Recurrencia , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida del Simio/complicaciones , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida del Simio/tratamiento farmacológico , Carga Viral
3.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci ; 58(3): 346-355, 2019 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30935442

RESUMEN

Maximizing animal wellbeing by minimizing drug-related side effects is a key consideration when choosing pharmaceutical agents for chemical restraint in nonhuman primates. One drug combination that may promote this ideology is butorphanol (27.3 mg/mL), azaperone (9.1 mg/mL), and medetomidine (10.9 mg/mL; BAM). Based on results from a pilot study, 2 doses of BAM (16 and 24 µL/kg IM) were compared in healthy, 3-y-old rhesus macaques. Physiologic parameters and anesthetic quality were assessed and recorded every 5 min. Experimental endpoints were established for hypoxemia (85% or less peripheral oxygen saturation with oxygen supplementation), pulse rate (80 bpm or less for 2 consecutive readings), mean arterial pressure (MAP; 50 mm Hg or less), and hypothermia (97 °F or less); if any endpoint was achieved, medetomidine was reversed by using atipamezole (0.22 mg/kg IM). Both BAM doses resulted in immobilization of all animals with no clinically significant differences between groups. All animals initially exhibited hypoxemia that resolved with oxygen supplementation. Regardless of dose, most macaques (71%) reached established experimental endpoints for bradycardia (62 to 80 bpm) or hypotension (44 to 50 mm Hg MAP). Given the results of this study, our recommendation regarding the use of 16- or 24-µL/kg BAM for immobilizing rhesus macaques is dependent on caution regarding cardiopulmonary parameters and the provision of supplemental oxygen.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona/farmacología , Butorfanol/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Macaca mulatta/fisiología , Medetomidina/farmacología , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Animales , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Imidazoles/farmacología , Masculino , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...