Auxiliary Partial Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Is a Safe and Effective Option for Yellow Phosphorus Toxin-induced Acute Liver Failure.

BACKGROUND: Ingestion of yellow phosphorus-containing rodenticides (YPR) or firecrackers is an important cause of acute liver failure (ALF) in young adults and children, particularly in South and South-East Asia and South America. Emergency liver transplantation is indicated in cases refractory to intensive supportive therapy, including low-volume plasma exchange. There are no published reports on the feasibility of auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) for YPR-induced ALF. METHODS: Clinical details of patients undergoing APOLT for YPR-induced ALF in 1 unit are reported. Details of postoperative follow-up, native remnant regeneration, and immunosuppression withdrawal are also reported. RESULTS: Between January 2021 and December 2023, 3 patients (4 y, 1.5 y, and 26 y) underwent emergency living donor liver transplantation for YPR-induced ALF. All patients were refractory to supportive therapies, including therapeutic plasma exchange, and demonstrated progression of liver injury in the form of severe encephalopathy needing intubation, ventilation, and organ support. APOLT was considered because of their young age and minimal intraoperative inotropic requirement. All explants showed confluent parenchymal necrosis with microvesicular and macrovesicular steatosis. Patients were initially maintained on standard immunosuppression. Good remnant regeneration was noted on follow-up imaging in all cases, enabling gradual withdrawal of immunosuppression. Currently, 1 child has been off immunosuppression for 15 mo and 2 others are on reduced doses of immunosuppression. All patients demonstrated good liver function. CONCLUSIONS: APOLT procedure can be an appropriate transplant option in YPR-related ALF for children and young adults without severe hemodynamic instability.

Defining Surgical Difficulty During Open Right Lobe Donor Hepatectomy and its Prediction Using Preoperative Donor Computed Tomography Morphometry.

Background: There is no accepted way to define difficult donor hepatectomy (DiffDH) during open right live donor hepatectomy (ORLDH). There are also no studies exploring association between DiffDH and early donor outcomes or reliable pre-operative predictors of DiffDH. Methods: Consecutive ORLDH performed over 18 months at a single center were included. Intraoperative parameters were used to develop an objective definition of DiffDH. The impact of DiffDH on early postoperative outcomes and achievement of textbook outcome (TO) was evaluated. Donor morphometry data on axial and coronal sections of donor computed tomography (CT) at the level of portal bifurcation were collected. Donor and graft factors predictive of DiffDH were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: One-hundred-eleven donors (male: 40.5%, age: 34 ± 9.5 years) underwent ORLDH during the study period. The difficulty score was constructed using five intraoperative parameters, i.e., operating time, transection time, estimated blood loss, need for intraoperative vasopressors, and need for Pringle maneuver. Donors were classified as DiffDH (score ≥ 2) or standard donor hepatectomy (StDH) (score <2). Twenty-nine donors (26%) were classified as DiffDH. DiffDH donors suffered greater all-cause morbidity (P = 0.004) but not major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score >2; P = 0.651), more perioperative transfusion (P = 0.013), increased postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (P = 0.034), delay in achieving full oral diet (P = 0.047), and a 70% reduced chance of achieving TO as compared to StDH (P = 0.007). On logistic regression analysis, increasing right lobe anteroposterior depth (RLdepth) was identified as an independent predictor of DiffDH (Odds ratio: 2.0 (95% confidence interval = 1.2, 3.3), P < 0.006). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified an RLdepth of >14 cm as the best predictor of DiffDH (sensitivity:79%, specificity: 66%, area under curve = 0.803, P < 0.001). Conclusion: We report a novel definition of DiffDH and show that it is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, including a lesser chance of achieving TO. We also report that DiffDH can be predicted from readily available donor CT parameters.

Pediatric combined living donor liver and kidney transplantation for primary hyperoxaluria type 2.

We report the case of a 12-year-old boy with primary hyperoxaluria type 2 (PH2) presenting with end-stage renal disease and systemic oxalosis who underwent a combined living donor liver and kidney transplant from 3 donors, 1 of whom was a heterozygous carrier of the mutation. Plasma oxalate and creatinine levels normalized immediately following the transplant and remain normal after 18 months. We recommend combined liver and kidney transplantation as the preferred therapeutic option for children with primary hyperoxaluria type 2 with early-onset end-stage renal disease.

First Report of a Paediatric Collision Tumour in the Liver Recognised After Liver Transplantation: Blissful Ignorance Has Benefits!

Liver tumours are uncommon in the paediatric population, constituting 1-2 % of all paediatric tumours and 4% of all paediatric liver tumours. Hepatoblastoma followed by hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common tumours in this age group. Simultaneous development of two discrete liver tumours of distinct histologies (collision tumour) has been occasionally reported in adults but never in children. We hereby present the first reported case of hepatic collision tumours (hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma) in the explant liver of a child who underwent living donor liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease and severe hepatopulmonary syndrome. The manuscript describes the clinical, radiological and histopathological findings of this case and also highlights the dilemma associated with management of this case had the diagnosis been made in the preoperative setting and also about the proposed management plan for this case in the postoperative period.

When Push Comes to Shove! Emergency ABO-Incompatible Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplant for Acute Wilson's Disease.

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) is on the rise as a viable option in countries with limited access to deceased donor grafts. While reported outcomes of ABOi-LT in children are similar to ABO- Compatible liver transplant (ABOc-LT), most children beyond 1-2 years of age will need desensitization to overcome the immunological barrier of incompatible blood groups. The current standard protocol for desensitization is Rituximab that targets B lymphocytes and is given 2-3 weeks prior to LT. However, this timeline may not be feasible in children requiring emergency LT for acute liver failure (ALF) or acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). In this emergency situation of ABOi-LT, a safe multipronged approach may be an acceptable alternative solution. We report a child with acute Wilson's disease with rapidly deteriorating liver function who underwent a successful ABOi-LDLT using a rapid desensitization protocol.

Living-Donor Liver Transplantation for Late-Onset Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency.

Late-onset liposomal acid lipase deficiency (LAL deficiency), previously known as Cholesteryl ester storage disease (CESD) is a rare genetic lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency of lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) due to mutations in the LIPA gene. LAL deficiency is a systemic disease that leads to the accumulation of fat and inflammation in the liver, premature atherosclerosis and gastrointestinal disease. Most of the patients require liver transplantation due to decompensated cirrhosis. Enzyme replacement therapy has been approved and is available in many countries. Here we describe a 16-year-old patient who was diagnosed to have late-onset LAL deficiency when he presented to us with ESLD. Subsequently, he underwent a living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) successfully. We discuss the ethical dilemmas in considering LDLT for LAL deficiency.

Viscoelastic Monitoring in Liver Transplantation.

Cirrhosis and liver transplantation (LT) surgery are associated with substantial alterations to the patient's coagulation status. Accurate monitoring of these changes during LT can help manage bleeding proactively and potentially reduce transfusion requirements. Unlike conventional coagulation tests (CCTs), viscoelastic monitoring (VEM) can provide an accurate, real-time, point-of-care assessment of coagulation status during LT and hence has become an invaluable tool for anesthetists and intensive care physicians. However, it remains an enigmatic subject for transplantation surgeons who are more conversant with CCTs. This review discusses the principles of VEM, provides a primer to understanding and interpreting its output, and explains how it can be used to make real-world clinical decisions during LT.

Role of therapeutic plasma exchange in acute liver failure due to yellow phosphorus poisoning.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been utilized in various liver disorders. There is limited data on the efficacy of TPE in patients with acute liver failure (ALF). METHODS: Study group consisted of patients who underwent TPE for ALF due to yellow phosphorous poisoning (YPP) between 2015 and 2019. Demographic data and biochemical parameters were recorded before and after TPE. Overall survival and transplant-free survival (based on King's College Hospital Criteria [KCHC]) were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients underwent TPE for ALF due to YPP. Most of them were young males. Overall survival was 34 (79.06%). In our study population, 20 patients fulfilled KCHC (Group A) and 23 did not fulfill KCHC (Group B). Both the groups showed significant improvement in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and international normalized ratio (INR) after TPE (p < 0.05). In Group B, there was significant improvement in ammonia after TPE (p < 0.05) and all 23 patients (100%) survived after TPE. In Group A, 4 underwent liver transplantation (LT), 7 survived without LT, and the remaining 9 died without LT. Mean survival after completing TPE was 41.2 ± 44.5 days in Group A and 90 days in Group B. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). There was statistically significant difference in post-TPE values of INR (p = 0.012) and ammonia (p = 0.011) between non-survivors and survivors. Adverse events such as hypotension (11.62%) and minor allergic reaction (4.65%) were managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: TPE is an effective procedure in ALF due to YPP, not fulfilling KCHC for LT. In KCHC fulfilled group, though it shows LT-free survival benefit, there is requirement of prospective, large volume, multi-center study to assess its efficacy.

Anaesthesia and intensive care for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-centre experience with 12 recipients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The perioperative management of patients presenting for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) is a complex process. We analysed SLKTs performed in our institution to identify preoperative, intraoperative and post-operative challenges encountered in the management. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the case records of 12 patients who underwent SLKT between 2009 and 2014 and analysed details of pre-operative evaluation and optimisation, intraoperative anaesthetic management and the implications of use of perioperative continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and the post-operative course of these patients. RESULTS: Of the total 12 cases, 4 were under 16 years of age. The indications for SLKT were primary hyperoxaluria (5), congenital hepatic fibrosis with polycystic kidney disease (2), ethanol-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD) with hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (1). Four patients had ESLD with end-stage renal disease due to other causes. Six recipients received live donor grafts and 6 patients received cadaveric grafts. Seven patients received intraoperative CRRT. Mean duration of surgery was 12.5 h. Cardiac output monitors used were trans-oesophageal echocardiogram (2), pulmonary artery catheter (1) and pulse contour cardiac output monitor (3). There was 1 sepsis-related mortality on 7(th) post-operative day. CONCLUSION: A thorough pre-operative evaluation and optimisation, knowledge and anticipation of potential problems, and meticulous intraoperative fluid management guided by appropriate monitoring and use of CRRT when needed can help in achieving successful outcomes.