Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023485

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients have a higher incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the role of VT ablation in this population is not well-established. OBJECTIVES: This single-center retrospective cohort study sought to examine the impact of post-LVAD implant VT ablation on survival. METHODS: This retrospective study examined a cohort of patients that underwent LVAD implantation at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center and Texas Heart Institute between January 2011 and January 2021. All-cause estimated mortality was compared across LVAD recipients based on the incidence of VT, timing of VT onset, and the occurrence and timing of VT ablation utilizing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Post-implant VT occurred in 53% of 575 LVAD recipients. Higher mortality was seen among patients with post-implant VT within a year of implantation (HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.15-2.27]). Among this cohort, patients who were treated with a catheter ablation had superior survival compared with patients treated with medical therapy alone for the 45 months following VT onset (HR: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.26-0.89]). Moreover, performance of an ablation in this population aligned mortality rates with those who did not experience post-implant VT (HR: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.71-1.98]). CONCLUSIONS: VT occurrence within 1 year of LVAD implantation was associated with worse survival. However, performance of VT ablation in this population was correlated with improved survival compared with medical management alone. Among patients with refractory VT, catheter ablation aligned survival with other LVAD participants without post-implant VT. Catheter ablation of VT is associated with improved survival in LVAD recipients, but further prospective randomized studies are needed to compare VT ablation to medical management in LVAD recipients.

2.
J Electrocardiol ; 80: 151-154, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37390587

RESUMEN

A patient with right bundle branch block (RBBB) presented with chest pain. An ECG showed ST-elevation in leads V1, V2, and aVR, with widespread ST-depression in leads II, aVF, I, aVL, and V4-6. The initial ECG interpretation missed ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), as ST-elevation thresholds were not reached. Non-urgent angiography showed severe left anterior descending artery stenosis requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. The course was complicated by cardiac arrest necessitating resuscitation and dual chamber pacemaker placement with left bundle branch pacing. This case report outlines the deficiencies of the current voltage criteria for identification of anterior STEMI in patients with RBBB.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Bloqueo de Rama/complicaciones , Bloqueo de Rama/diagnóstico , Electrocardiografía , Estenosis Coronaria/complicaciones , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA