RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies report high levels of inflammatory markers in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), reflecting chronic low-grade inflammation. This inflammation is thought to be associated with insulin resistance. We aim to evaluate inflammatory markers [high sensitivity C reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6] and insulin resistance in women with PCOS in Yaoundé, Cameroon. METHODS: We conducted a comparative cross-sectional study including 32 women with PCOS aged between 18 and 44 years and 32 controls matched for age and body mass index (BMI). Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index calculated using C peptide levels was used to evaluate insulin resistance. Serum levels of high sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were measured. Comparisons were made using the Student's T-test and non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test). RESULTS: We found that the median [25th-75th percentile] level of hsCRP was significantly higher in women with PCOS compared to the controls (0.63 [0.32-3.81] mg/L vs. 0.47 [0.15-1.04] mg/L; p=0.01), while IL-6 levels were not different (8.61 [4.1-33.79] pg/mL for PCOS vs. 8.80 [5.28-38.85] pg/mL for controls; p=0.51). We noted that women with PCOS had a higher HOMA-IR index (1.15±0.90 vs. 0.77±0.38; p=0.03). However, there was no correlation between hsCRP level and the HOMA-IR index (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.10; p=0.62). CONCLUSION: PCOS is associated with an increased level of hsCRP and insulin resistance in Cameroonian women. This exploratory study provides baseline evidence for larger-scale studies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are used to estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and to guide prescriptions. To circumvent the challenges of direct LDL-C measurement, guidelines recommend the use of Friedewald formula derived LDL-C levels. Despite reported limitations of this formula, its validity in sub-Saharan Africans has not been adequately investigated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the Friedewald formula derived against directly (homogeneous) measured LDL-C in adult Cameroonians. METHODS: We reviewed the fasting lipid profiles of 2500 patients, performed between March 2012 and January 2016 using enzymatic colorimetric method (reference), at the Douala General Hospital laboratory. The Friedewald formula was used to calculate LDL-C from total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Calculated LDL-C values were compared to the reference values, and clinical significance of differences between the two methods was assessed using total error allowable (TEa). RESULTS: The difference between means of calculated and the reference LDL-C values was neither statistically nor clinically significant (3.33±1.51 vs. 3.33±1.25mmol/l; p=0.704). The calculated LDL-C correlated positively with the measured LDL-C value (r=0.749) and both methods showed a good agreement on Bland-Altman plot. Conversely, there was only moderate agreement (kappa=0.478, 95% CI: 0.455-0.502) between the two values in the stratification of cardiovascular risk according to the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III. Consequently, 40.6% of the participants were misclassified. CONCLUSION: Friedewald formula is technically accurate but has a modest clinical accuracy which can translate into a substantial misclassification of patients' cardiovascular risk and subsequent inappropriate therapeutic decisions.
