Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 379(9): 811-822, 2018 08 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30157389

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that bridges activated factor IX and factor X to replace the function of missing activated factor VIII, thereby restoring hemostasis. In a phase 3, multicenter trial, we investigated its use as prophylaxis in persons who have hemophilia A without factor VIII inhibitors. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, participants 12 years of age or older who had been receiving episodic treatment with factor VIII to receive a subcutaneous maintenance dose of emicizumab of 1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight per week (group A) or 3.0 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks (group B) or no prophylaxis (group C). The primary end point was the difference in rates of treated bleeding (group A vs. group C and group B vs. group C). Participants who had been receiving factor VIII prophylaxis received emicizumab at a maintenance dose of 1.5 mg per kilogram per week (group D); intraindividual comparisons were performed in those who had participated in a noninterventional study. RESULTS: A total of 152 participants were enrolled. The annualized bleeding rate was 1.5 events (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 2.5) in group A and 1.3 events (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.3) in group B, as compared with 38.2 events (95% CI, 22.9 to 63.8) in group C; thus, the rate was 96% lower in group A and 97% lower in group B (P<0.001 for both comparisons). A total of 56% of the participants in group A and 60% of those in group B had no treated bleeding events, as compared with those in group C, who all had treated bleeding events. In the intraindividual comparison involving 48 participants, emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an annualized bleeding rate that was 68% lower than the rate with previous factor VIII prophylaxis (P<0.001). The most frequent adverse event was low-grade injection-site reaction. There were no thrombotic or thrombotic microangiopathy events, development of antidrug antibodies, or new development of factor VIII inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Emicizumab prophylaxis administered subcutaneously once weekly or every 2 weeks led to a significantly lower bleeding rate than no prophylaxis among persons with hemophilia A without inhibitors; more than half the participants who received prophylaxis had no treated bleeding events. In an intraindividual comparison, emicizumab therapy led to a significantly lower bleeding rate than previous factor VIII prophylaxis. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche and Chugai Pharmaceutical; HAVEN 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02847637 .).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Factor de Coagulación Sanguínea , Esquema de Medicación , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Adulto Joven
3.
Blood ; 121(20): 4046-55, 2013 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23553768

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to examine the association of the intensity of treatment, ranging from high-dose intensive factor VIII (FVIII) treatment to prophylactic treatment, with the inhibitor incidence among previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. This cohort study aimed to include consecutive patients with a FVIII activity < 0.01 IU/mL, born between 2000 and 2010, and observed during their first 75 FVIII exposure days. Intensive FVIII treatment of hemorrhages or surgery at the start of treatment was associated with an increased inhibitor risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.0). High-dose FVIII treatment was associated with a higher inhibitor risk than low-dose FVIII treatment (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0-4.8). Prophylaxis was only associated with a decreased overall inhibitor incidence after 20 exposure days of FVIII. The association with prophylaxis was more pronounced in patients with low-risk F8 genotypes than in patients with high-risk F8 genotypes (aHR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.19-2.0 and aHR, 0.85, 95% CI, 0.51-1.4, respectively). In conclusion, our findings suggest that in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, high-dosed intensive FVIII treatment increases inhibitor risk and prophylactic FVIII treatment decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Factor de Coagulación Sanguínea/metabolismo , Factor VIII/administración & dosificación , Factor VIII/antagonistas & inhibidores , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia A/epidemiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Inhibidores de Factor de Coagulación Sanguínea/sangre , Quimioprevención/efectos adversos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Hemofilia A/sangre , Hemofilia A/metabolismo , Hemorragia/sangre , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/metabolismo , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA