The Clinical Utility of the NETest in Patients with Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (Si-NENs): A "Real-Life" Study.

Current biomarkers do not adequately predict the behaviour of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). This study assessed the NETest, a multianalyte blood biomarker, in patients with small intestinal NENs (Si-NENs). We studied two patient groups: Group 1: metastatic Si-NENs (n = 102) and Group 2: post-operatively disease-free according to 68Ga-DOTATATE PET (n = 16). NETest scores were ≤20% (normal), 21-40% (low), 41-79% (intermediate), or ≥80% (high). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. In Group 1, the median NETest score was 40% (IQR: 33.3-46.7%). The NETest value (HR: 1.032, 95% CI: 1.003-1.062, p = 0.033) and high-risk NETest category (HR: 10.5, 95% CI: 1.35-81.7, p = 0.025) were independent predictors of PFS, along with presence of lung metastases, CgA levels > 10 × ULN, and tumour growth rate (TGR). Independent predictors of OS were the NETest value (HR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.005-1.066, p = 0.024) and high-risk NETest category (HR: 15.2, 95% CI: 1.52-151, p = 0.02), along with presence of lung metastases and CgA levels > 10 × ULN. In Group 2, ROC analysis identified an AUC of 0.909 (95% CI: 0.75-0.100) for prediction of local or metastatic recurrence. Blood NETest scores were associated with PFS and OS in patients with metastatic Si-NENs, along with TGR, CgA > 10 × ULN, and presence of lung metastases.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumours: A multicentric retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) has been reported as a feasible and effective treatment for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumours (R-NETs). However, most of the experience on the topic comes from retrospective tertiary centre from Eastern Asia. Data on ESD for R-NETs in Western centres are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study, including patients who underwent endoscopic resection of R-NETS by ESD between 2015 and 2020 in Western Centres. Important clinical variables such as demographic, size of R-NETs, histological type, presence of lymphovascular invasion or distant metastasis, completeness of the endoscopic resection, recurrence, and procedure related complications were recorded. RESULTS: 40 ESD procedure on R-NETs from 39 patients from 8 centres were included. Mean R-NETs size was 10.3 mm (SD 4.01). Endoscopic en-bloc resection was achieved in 39/40 ESD (97.5 %), R0 margin resection was obtained in 87.5 % (35/40) of the procedures, one patient was referred to surgery for lymphovascular invasion, two procedures (5 %) reported significant episodes of bleeding, whereas a perforation occurred in one case (1/40, 2.5 %) managed endoscopically. Recurrence occurred in 1 patient (2.5 %). CONCLUSION: ESD is an effective and safe treatment for R-NETs in western centres.

Endoscopic Management of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: An Overview of Proposed Resection and Ablation Techniques.

A literature search of MEDLINE/PUBMED was conducted with the aim to highlight current endoscopic management of localised gastro-entero-pancreatic NETs. Relevant articles were identified through a manual search, and reference lists were reviewed for additional articles. The results of the research have been displayed in a narrative fashion to illustrate the actual state-of-the-art of endoscopic techniques in the treatment of NETs. Localised NETs of the stomach, duodenum and rectum can benefit from advanced endoscopic resection techniques (e.g., modified endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic full thickness resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection) according to centre expertise. Radiofrequency thermal ablation can be proposed as an alternative to surgery in selected patients with localised pancreatic NETs.

Plasma or serum 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid can be used interchangeably in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

5-hydroxyindole acetic acid, a metabolite of serotonin, is used in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with neuroendocrine tumours, in particular patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours associated with the carcinoid syndrome. Analysis of 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid was commonly performed in urine, but blood-based assays are now becoming available. The objective of this study was to assess how 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid compares in plasma and serum as a biochemical marker of neuroendocrine tumours. Twenty-four-hour urine, plasma and serum samples were obtained from 80 patients with neuroendocrine tumours and 30 healthy volunteers. We developed a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for plasma and serum 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid. Comparison was made between them, and their cut-off was determined using a receiver-operating characteristic curve. A close correlation was shown between plasma and serum 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid. At a cut-off of 135 nmol/l, a sensitivity of 91.2% with a specificity of 61.9% was obtained for both compared to the urinary assay. A statistically significant agreement was shown when plasma and serum 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid were compared with the currently used urine assay in patients with neuroendocrine tumours; κ = 0.675 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.86), p < 0.001 and healthy volunteers; 0.967 (95% CI 0.828 to 0.999), p = <0.001. In conclusion, 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid in plasma and serum were comparable, hence either sample type can be used interchangeably.