Personalised 3D Printed high tibial osteotomy achieves a high level of accuracy: 'IDEAL' preclinical stage evaluation of a novel patient specific system.

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an effective surgical treatment for isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis; however, widespread adoption is limited due to difficulty in achieving the planned correction, and patient dissatisfaction due to soft tissue irritation. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a novel HTO system with 3D printed patient specific implants and surgical guides using cadaveric specimens. Local ethics committee approval was obtained. The novel opening wedge HTO procedure was performed on eight cadaver leg specimens. Whole lower limb CT scans pre- and post-operatively provided geometrical assessment quantifying the discrepancy between pre-planned and post-operative measurements for key variables: the gap opening angle and the patient specific surgical instrumentation positioning. The average discrepancy between the pre-operative plan and the post-operative osteotomy correction angle was: 0.0 ±â€ˆ0.2° The R2 value for the regression correlation was 0.95. The average error in implant positioning was -0.4 ±â€ˆ4.3 mm, -2.6 ±â€ˆ3.4 mm and 3.1 ±â€ˆ1.7° vertically, horizontally, and rotationally respectively. This novel HTO surgery has greater accuracy in correction angle achieved compared to that reported for conventional or other patient specific methods with published data available. This system could potentially improve the accuracy of osteotomy correction angles achieved surgically.

The largest survivorship and clinical outcomes study of the fixed bearing Stryker Triathlon Partial Knee Replacement - A multi-surgeon, single centre cohort study with a minimum of two years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of isolated medial compartment degenerative disease of the knee causes debate. Unicompartmental arthroplasty options include fixed and mobile bearing implant designs with fixed bearing becoming increasingly popular. We present the largest cohort of a fixed bearing single radius design, Stryker Triathlon Partial Knee Replacement (PKR). METHODS: We prospectively collected demographic data and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) on our cohort of PKR implants since its adoption in our unit, 2009 until March 2015. RESULTS: A total of 129 implants in 115 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (2.5 to 8.5 years) were included. There were 11 revisions at an average of 1.7 years (0.6-4.1 years), two for infection, two for mal-alignment, five for progression of disease and two for loosening. The survivorship of the implants at five years is 90%. CONCLUSION: The PKR provides good survivorship at five years and PROM scores that are equal to the largest and most popular comparable implants. There is an associated learning curve with this implant, as there is with all systems and this is reflected in our results.

Mid-term survivorship and clinical outcomes of the Avon patellofemoral joint replacement.

BACKGROUND: We present the largest series of Avon patellofemoral joint (PFJ) replacements outside of the design centre. There is discussion over its efficacy and usefulness. We report an independent opinion of its indications, survivorship and outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively collected demographic data and patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) on our cohort of Avon Patellofemoral replacements since its adoption in our unit in 2003 until 2014. We performed a retrospective review of radiographs. RESULTS: We performed 103 PFJ replacements in 85 patients, 36 were male (mean age 61 - range 34 to 78) and 67 female (mean age 60 - range 38 to 82), mean follow up time was 5.6years (range 2.9 to 14.2years) with 93 implants still in situ. Their mean post-operative Oxford Knee Score was 36 (range seven to 48). There were nine conversions to TKR for disease progression and one revision of a femoral component for trochlear malpositioning. Mean time to revision was 2.9years (1.0 to 6.0years). Radiographic evidence of progression on Kellgren and Lawrence score in the un-replaced compartments was demonstrated in 23% of cases with imaging available. The Avon PFJ replacement delivers reproducible and effective pain relief and function to patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. We believe PFJ replacement has an important role to play, and we will continue to perform this procedure for a carefully selected group of patients. Conversion to TKR does not and should not be regarded as failure of the index operation.

The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial.

AIMS: Our aim was to compare kinematic with mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective blinded randomised controlled trial to compare the functional outcome of patients undergoing TKA in mechanical alignment (MA) with those in kinematic alignment (KA). A total of 71 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to either kinematic (n = 36) or mechanical alignment (n = 35). Pre- and post-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs were analysed. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), American Knee Society Score, Short Form-36, Euro-Qol (EQ-5D), range of movement (ROM), two minute walk, and timed up and go tests were assessed pre-operatively and at six weeks, three and six months and one year post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 78% of the kinematically aligned group (28 patients) and 77% of the mechanically aligned group (27 patients) were within 3° of their pre-operative plan. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean KOOS (difference 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.4 to 12.1, p = 0.80), EQ-5D (difference 0.8, 95% CI -7.9 to 9.6, p = 0.84), ROM (difference 0.1, 95% CI -6.0 to 6.1, p = 0.99), two minute distance tolerance (difference 20.0, 95% CI -52.8 to 92.8, p = 0.58), or timed up and go (difference 0.78, 95% CI -2.3 to 3.9, p = 0.62) between the groups at one year. CONCLUSION: Kinematically aligned TKAs appear to have comparable short-term results to mechanically aligned TKAs with no significant differences in function one year post-operatively. Further research is required to see if any theoretical long-term functional benefits of kinematic alignment are realised or if there are any potential effects on implant survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1360-8.

The Lateral Meniscus as a Guide to Anatomical Tibial Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to show, on an MRI scan, that the posterior border of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM) could guide tibial tunnel position in the sagittal plane and provide anatomical graft position. METHOD: One hundred MRI scans were analysed with normal cruciate ligaments and no evidence of meniscal injury. We measured the distance between the posterior border of the AHLM and the midpoint of the ACL by superimposing sagittal images. RESULTS: The mean distance between the posterior border of the AHLM and the ACL midpoint was -0.1mm (i.e. 0.1mm posterior to the ACL midpoint). The range was 5mm to -4.6mm. The median value was 0.0mm. 95% confidence interval was from -0.5 to 0.3mm. A normal, parametric distribution was observed and Intra- and inter-observer variability showed significant correlation (p<0.05) using Pearsons Correlation test (intra-observer) and Interclass correlation (inter-observer). CONCLUSION: Using the posterior border of the AHLM is a reproducible and anatomical marker for the midpoint of the ACL footprint in the majority of cases. It can be used intra-operatively as a guide for tibial tunnel insertion and graft placement allowing anatomical reconstruction. There will inevitably be some anatomical variation. Pre-operative MRI assessment of the relationship between AHLM and ACL footprint is advised to improve surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.