Flap Closure of Spinal Defects in High-Risk Patients: A 10-Year Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: Complication rates after spinal surgery are high, in part because of surgical advancements that have made procedures available to a broader range of medically complicated patients. The high rates of infection, hematoma, and dehiscence resulting in open wounds after spinal surgery often warrant plastic surgery involvement. In this study, we aim to examine the effects of preoperative and operative risk factors on complication rates, reoperation rates, and hospital length of stay after flap reconstruction of spinal defects. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 373 patients who required flap reconstruction for spinal wound closure at our institution between 2003 and 2013. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and postreconstructive course were collected. RESULTS: Of the 373 patients, 97.3% had at least 1 comorbid condition associated with poor wound healing, 91.2% had a significant wound condition at the time of reconstruction, and 81.8% had a history of 2 or more spinal surgeries. After reconstruction, average hospital stay was 14 days, with 35% of patients developing complications and 30% requiring reoperation. Risk factors including elevated body mass index, diabetes, tobacco use, steroid use, low prealbumin level, therapeutic anticoagulation, infection, history of spine surgery, multilevel spinal reconstruction, and spinal hardware were associated with complications, reoperations, and prolonged length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Local muscle flap coverage is an effective strategy for the reconstruction of spinal defects in medically complex patients. To reduce the inherently high risks associated with paraspinous reconstruction in this challenging population, special consideration should be given to preoperative and operative variables associated with poor outcomes. Early coordination between spine and plastic surgeons should be considered in patients at high-risk of wound complications.

Surgical Management of Hand Deformity in Epidermolysis Bullosa: Initial Experience and Technique.

Epidermolysis bullosa describes a rare group of genetic mucocutaneous disorders characterized by excessive epithelial fragility resulting in mechanically induced blistering and abnormal wound healing.1,2 Its prevalence and incidence are 8.2 and 19.6 per 1,000,000 live births, respectively.2 Gene therapy, protein replacement, and cell therapy strategies have been investigated, but there is currently no cure.2.

Quick Calculation of Breast Resection Mass Using the Schnur Scale.

In 1991, Dr Paul Schnur and his colleagues published an article correlating the weight of breast tissue to be removed in a breast reduction operation with the total body surface area (BSA) of the patient. They presented a very cogent argument for selecting three groups of patients: those with medical indications for operation, those who merit review, and those whose operation could be considered cosmetic. The Schnur Sliding Scale is widely used by insurance companies in the western United States in the process of preauthorizing breast reduction operations, and its use may be spreading eastward. The Schnur group presented a nomogram for calculating BSA and a scale in the form of a table for guiding a determination of whether the patient is a reconstructive patient as opposed to an aesthetic patient. We have combined the scale and the BSA nomogram for a simplified nomogram calculator that facilitates rapid determination of anticipated tissue weight of resection for a patient of a given size. This calculator yields the required weight of tissue to remove with just knowledge of the patient's height and weight and the use of a straight edge. We demonstrate and compare performance of this calculation by hand and by nomogram. There is ample evidence that the practice of applying the Schnur Sliding Scale may be prohibitive to symptomatic patients seeking reduction mammaplasty and should be abandoned. While this practice continues, our simplified Schnur Sliding Scale nomogram is meant to help easily determine the insurer-required minimum breast resection weight and thereby both improve patient counseling prior to planning surgery and assist the surgeon with achieving insurer reimbursement for the procedure while avoiding rejected claims.

Simplified Calvarial Reconstruction: Coverage of Bare Skull With GammaGraft Promotes Granulation and Facilitates Skin Grafting.

Repair of scalp defects with exposed calvaria remains a difficult clinical problem. Herein, we present a simple alternative method of scalp reconstruction. Coverage of bare skull with GammaGraft (Promethean LifeSciences, Inc, Pittsburgh, PA) promotes the evolution of granulation tissue and permits subsequent skin grafting without need for burring, drilling, or other manipulation of the outer table of the calvaria. A retrospective review of patients undergoing scalp reconstruction utilizing GammaGraft and subsequent skin grafting was performed at our institution. From our cohort, 5 patients treated with GammaGraft and subsequent skin grafting had both immediate and long-term follow-up available. Indications for scalp reconstruction included erosions of prior skin grafts and direct excision of full-thickness scalp and pericranium. Average time to definitive skin grafting was 3 weeks; repeat application of GammaGraft was required in some patients with reapplication to subsequent smaller wounds as healing occurred. Complications were minor and consisted of ongoing wound drainage. Alternative flap reconstruction was not required in any patient due to treatment failures. No major complications, wound infections, or early reoperations occurred in any of the patients; 1 patient to date has required repeat reconstruction due to recurrent disease. Coverage of bare skull with GammaGraft and subsequent skin grafting provides a simple and elegant solution to an often too difficult clinical problem. Confirmed by results in out limited series, the utilization of GammaGraft in calvarial reconstruction represents an alternative method in surgical care of complex scalp defects with exposed bone.