RESUMEN
Field surveys and laboratory studies were used to determine the role of substrata in habitat selection by young-of-the year winter flounder. A synoptic field survey of winter flounder and sediments in the Navesink River-Sandy Hook Bay estuarine system in New Jersey demonstrated that winter flounder distribution was related to sediment grain size. Analysis using a generalized additive model indicated that the probability of capturing 10-49 mm SL winter flounder was high on sediments with a mean grain diameter of =0.5 mm, while fish 50-95 mm were least likely to be collected on fine sediments and most commonly on sediments with a grain-size near 1.0 mm. In the laboratory, sediment preferences and the burying ability of winter flounder (15-69 mm SL) were tested by exposing fish in 10-mm size groups to a choice of azoic sediments of different sediment grain sizes. Smaller individuals (<40 mm SL) preferred fine-grained sediments while larger individuals (>/=40 mm SL) preferred coarse-grained sediments. Burying ability increased with size and all flounders avoided sediments that prevented burial. Subsequent laboratory experiments revealed that the presence of live prey (Mya arenaria) can over-ride sediment choice by winter flounder (50-68 mm SL) indicating the complexity of interrelated factors in habitat choice.
RESUMEN
Field and laboratory investigations were conducted to examine feeding by newly settled winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) on two co-occurring calanoid copepods, Eurytemora affinis and Acartia hudsonica. During the spring, these prey are present when winter flounder initiate their demersal lifestyle in estuaries of the northeastern United States. Epibenthic zooplankton were collected concurrently with winter flounder in the Navesink River estuary, NJ, in May 1998 and 1999. Although both calanoid species were in the estuary during the 2-year survey, E. affinis was consumed nearly to the exclusion of A. hudsonica by newly settled winter flounder. Annually, E. affinis and A. hudsonica had similar size distributions in field collections, indicating that species choice was not size selective. However, when preying on E. affinis, winter flounder preferred the larger sized organisms. In single species laboratory experiments, E. affinis and A. hudsonica were consumed equally by newly settled winter flounder (19-23 mm TL), but there were more strikes made toward E. affinis. Despite the lower catch efficiency, E. affinis was selected over A. hudsonica when the prey species were offered together in equal numbers. The selection for E. affinis over A. hudsonica by newly settled winter flounder may be the result of behavioral and/or morphological differences in the prey species.