Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sleep Breath ; 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with multiple comorbidities, including diabetes. Its development is preceded by alterations in the initial phase of carbohydrate metabolism characterized by insulin resistance. This study aims to evaluate the role of intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation characteristic of OSA on the risk of insulin resistance among apneic patients without diabetes. METHODOLOGY: 92 consecutive patients with OSA without evidence of diabetes were recruited. Overnight video polysomnography was performed and, the following morning, fasting blood glucose, insulin and glycosylated hemoglobin were determined. Insulin resistance was measured using the HOMA-IR index. RESULTS: Insulin resistance was present in 52.2% of OSA patients. In these subjects, insulin resistance was independently associated to the apnea index during REM sleep (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.16; p = 0.004), desaturation index (aOR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.13; p = 0.027), and sleep time with oxygen saturation below 90% (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08; p = 0.049). Furthermore, the HOMA-IR level was also directly related to the desaturation index (standardized regression coefficient [B] = 0.514, p < 0.001) and to the apnea index during REM sleep (B = 0.344, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent hypoxia and disturbances in REM sleep emerge as main contributors to insulin resistance in OSA patients yet to experience diabetes onset.

2.
Am J Infect Control ; 2023 Nov 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38007099

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Influenza epidemics annually impact a substantial portion of adults worldwide, leading to numerous hospitalizations and fatalities. While the primary goal of vaccination is to prevent influenza virus infection, breakthrough infections can still occur despite vaccination. Evaluating the vaccine effectiveness in preventing severe cases among hospitalized patients is crucial for enhancing vaccination strategies. METHODS: This single-center, observational, cross-sectional, and retrospective study analyzed data from 1,357 patients admitted to La Paz University Hospital for influenza infection between 2009 and 2019. Patients' demographics, clinical variables, comorbidities, vaccination status, and influenza-related outcomes were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the vaccine-independent protective effects. RESULTS: Influenza vaccination independently prevented severe complications, including pneumonia, bacterial superinfection, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and multiple organ failure in hospitalized patients (odds ratio = 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.76). Vaccinated patients had significantly lower intensive care unit admission rates (odds ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.92). However, there were no significant differences in mortality rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients (P = .385). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides robust evidence supporting the influenza vaccine protective effect against severe outcomes in hospitalized patients during epidemic flu. Vaccination is associated with a significant reduction in severe complications and intensive care unit admissions, emphasizing its importance as a preventive measure. Improving vaccination coverage, especially in specific comorbidities and age groups, could further enhance the vaccine effectiveness in preventing severe influenza cases.

3.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 41(7): 391-395, Agos-Sept- 2023. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-223712

RESUMEN

Objetivos: Analizar las características de los pacientes con gripe nosocomial, compararlas con las de los enfermos con diagnóstico de gripe comunitaria para estudiar posibles diferencias e identificar posibles factores de riesgo asociados a este tipo de gripe. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal y retrospectivo de los pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico microbiológico de gripe en un hospital universitario de tercer nivel durante 10 temporadas, de 2009 a 2019. Se definió como gripe nosocomial aquella infección cuyos síntomas comenzaron 72 h después del ingreso hospitalario y se analizó su incidencia, características y consecuencias. Resultados: Se incluyó a un total de 1.260 pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico microbiológico de gripe, de los cuales 110 (8,7%) fueron nosocomiales. Los pacientes con gripe adquirida en el hospital eran más jóvenes (71,74±16,03 años; p=0,044), tuvieron una estancia hospitalaria mayor (24,25±20,25 días; p<0,001), tenían con mayor frecuencia antecedentes de enfermedades pulmonares crónicas (p=0,010), inmunodeficiencias (p<0,001) y se asociaron con mayor desarrollo de sobreinfección bacteriana (p<0,001), distrés respiratorio (p=0,003) e ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) (p<0,001). En el análisis por regresión logística multivariante se identificaron como factores de riesgo independientes: inmunodeficiencia (ORa=2,33; IC 95%: 1,47-3,60); ingreso en UCI (ORa=4,29; IC 95%: 2,23-10,91); desarrollo de sobreinfección bacteriana (ORa=1,64; IC 95%: 1,06-2,53) y de distrés respiratorio (ORa=3,88; IC 95%: 1,23-12,23).Conclusiones: La gripe nosocomial es más frecuente en los pacientes con antecedentes de inmunodeficiencia. Además, los enfermos con gripe hospitalaria tienen un riesgo aumentado de sobreinfección bacteriana, ingreso en UCI y desarrollo de distrés respiratorio.(AU)


Objectives: To analyze the characteristics of patients with nosocomial flu, to compare them with patients with community-acquired influenza to study possible differences and to identify possible risk factors associated with this type of flu. Patients and methodsObservational, cross-sectional and retrospective study of hospitalized patients with a microbiological confirmation of influenza in a third-level university hospital over 10seasons, from 2009 to 2019. Nosocomial influenza was defined as that infection whose symptoms began 72h after hospital admission, and its incidence, characteristics and consequences were further analyzed. Results: A total of 1260 hospitalized patients with a microbiological diagnosis of influenza were included, which 110 (8.7%) were nosocomial. Patients with hospital-acquired influenza were younger (71.74±16.03 years, P=0.044), had a longer hospital stay (24.25±20.25 days, P<0.001), had more frequently a history of chronic pulmonary pathologies (P=0.010), immunodeficiency (P<0.001), and were associated with greater development of bacterial superinfection (P<0.001), respiratory distress (P=0.003), and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (P<0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following characteristics were identified as independent risk factors: immunodeficiency (ORa=2.33; 95% CI: 1.47-3.60); ICU admission (ORa=4.29; 95% CI: 2.23-10.91); bacterial superinfection (ORa=1.64; 95% CI: 1.06-2.53) and respiratory distress (ORa=3.88; 95% CI: 1.23-12.23). Conclusions: Nosocomial influenza is more common in patients with a history of immunodeficiency. In addition, patients with hospital-acquired influenza had an increased risk of bacterial superinfection, admission to the ICU, and development of respiratory distress.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios/tendencias , Gripe Humana/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Microbiología , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Epidemiología Descriptiva
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36064786

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the characteristics of patients with nosocomial flu, to compare them with patients with community-acquired influenza to study possible differences and to identify possible risk factors associated with this type of flu. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study of hospitalized patients with a microbiological confirmation of influenza in a third-level university hospital over 10 seasons, from 2009 to 2019. Nosocomial influenza was defined as that infection whose symptoms began 72h after hospital admission, and its incidence, characteristics and consequences were further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1260 hospitalized patients with a microbiological diagnosis of influenza were included, which 110 (8.7%) were nosocomial. Patients with hospital-acquired influenza were younger (71.74±16.03 years, P=0.044), had a longer hospital stay (24.25±20.25 days, P<0.001), had more frequently a history of chronic pulmonary pathologies (P=0.010), immunodeficiency (P<0.001), and were associated with greater development of bacterial superinfection (P<0.001), respiratory distress (P=0.003), and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (P<0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following characteristics were identified as independent risk factors: immunodeficiency (ORa=2.33; 95% CI: 1.47-3.60); ICU admission (ORa=4.29; 95% CI: 2.23-10.91); bacterial superinfection (ORa=1.64; 95% CI: 1.06-2.53) and respiratory distress (ORa=3.88; 95% CI: 1.23-12.23). CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial influenza is more common in patients with a history of immunodeficiency. In addition, patients with hospital-acquired influenza had an increased risk of bacterial superinfection, admission to the ICU, and development of respiratory distress.

5.
Rev. patol. respir ; 25(4): 130-137, Oct-Dic. 2022. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-214585

RESUMEN

Objectives: The objectives of this study are (1) to analyse which group of admitted patients with risk factors is most ­vaccinated, (2) to find out whether vaccinated patients admitted for flu have fewer complications, and (3) to check whether there are differences in demographic and therapeutic characteristics between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients who have been admitted. Patients and methods: This is a single-centre, observational, cross-sectional, and retrospective study of patients admitted for flu at La Paz University Hospital in the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 seasons, with an analysis of the variables included in the clinical history and mandatory declaration documents. Results: A total of 179 patients were ­admitted for influenza infection in the two seasons studied, of whom 65 (36.3%) patients were vaccinated. Patients with chronic heart disease were significantly more vaccinated than other risk groups. Furthermore, the average age of vaccinated patients was significantly higher than that of unvaccinated patients. We did not find any other significant differences in the remaining ­variables when comparing the two groups, nor did we find any less development of complications in the admitted and ­vaccinated patients. Conclusion: It is important to emphasise vaccination campaigns, increase vaccination coverage, and raise awareness of vaccination among all patients with chronic diseases.(AU)


Objetivos: 1) analizar qué grupo de pacientes con factores de riesgo que ingresa se vacuna más; 2) averiguar si los ­enfermos con gripe hospitalizados que han sido vacunados tienen menor número de complicaciones, y 3) comprobar si existen diferencias en cuanto a las características demográficas y terapéuticas al comparar a los pacientes ingresados vacunados y no vacunados. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio unicéntrico, observacional, transversal y retrospectivo de los pacientes ingresados por gripe en el Hospital Universitario La Paz en las temporadas 2013–2014 y 2014–2015, con análisis de las variables recogidas en el documento del historial clínico y de los documentos de declaración obligatoria. Resultados: 179 pacientes ingresaron por gripe en las dos temporadas estudiadas, de los cuales estaban vacunados 65 (36.3%). Se vacunaron más, de forma significativa, los pacientes con enfermedades cardiacas crónicas frente al resto de grupos de riesgo. La edad media de los vacunados era significativamente mayor. No encontramos otras diferencias significativas en el resto de las variables al comparar los dos grupos, tampoco un menor desarrollo de complicaciones en los pacientes ­ingresados y vacunados. Conclusiones: Es importante hacer hincapié en las campañas de vacunación, es necesario aumentar la cobertura vacunal en, y concienciar sobre la vacunación a, los enfermos con patologías crónicas.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Vacunación , Gripe Humana , Pacientes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...