Need and strategy for sentinel surveillance for drug resistance in leprosy in India.

In the fight against leprosy drug resistance poses a serious impediment at a stage when there is dramatic decline in prevalence due to intensive and concerted chemotherapy intervention. Drug resistance in leprosy has been reported since 1964 for dapsone, 1976 for rifampicin and 1996 for ofloxacin. Recent reports and publications have indicated few instances of rifampicin resistance in several endemic areas. In light of reporting drug resistance in leprosy, the National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) in India has started collecting information on relapse cases from peripheral institutions. The data show quite significant number of relapse cases (328 in year 2008-09) reported from few endemic states. Comprehensive data on the magnitude of drug resistance are crucial to evaluate the efficacy of MDT and to maintain the effectiveness of the current leprosy control strategy. It has become a necessity to develop a surveillance system to keep a close vigil on drug resistance. PCR based assays have convincingly demonstrated that detection of rifampicin resistance by this method is a feasible and practical alternative to the mouse foot pad (MFP) assay and has practical application in India. Surveillance of drug resistance in leprosy can be carried out based on a sentinel surveillance model. Certain district hospitals and tertiary institutions can be identified as sentinel sites in endemic states where tissue samples can be collected and transported to the identified reference laboratories. Based on the suspected and confirmed relapsed cases reported, 12 states have been identified for inclusion under the surveillance of drug resistance in leprosy. These are Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Rajasthan, Tamilnadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Delhi. Four reference laboratories have already been identified, one each in the states of Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Tamilnadu and Delhi. Tissue samples from sentinel sites would be sent to designated laboratories for conducting the DNA sequencing tests to confirm rifampicin resistance.

Need and strategy for sentinel surveillance for drug resistance in leprosy in India

In the fight against leprosy drug resistance poses a serious impediment at a stage when there is dramatic decline in prevalence due to intensive and concerted chemotherapy intervention. Drug resistance in leprosy has been reported since 1964 for dapsone, 1976 for rifampicin and 1996 for ofloxacin. Recent reports and publications have indicated few instances of rifampicin resistance in several endemic areas. In light of reporting drug resistance in leprosy, the National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) in India has started collecting information on relapse cases from peripheral institutions. The data show quite significant number of relapse cases (328 in year 2008-09) reported from few endemic states. Comprehensive data on the magnitude of drug resistance are crucial to evaluate the efficacy of MDT and to maintain the effectiveness of the current leprosy control strategy. It has become a necessity to develop a surveillance system to keep a close vigil on drug resistance. PCR based assays have convincingly demonstrated that detection of rifampicin resistance by this method is a feasible and practical alternative to the mouse foot pad (MFP) assay and has practical application in India. Surveillance of drug resistance in leprosy can be carried out based on a sentinel surveillance model. Certain district hospitals and tertiary institutions can be identified as sentinel sites in endemic states where tissue samples can be collected and transported to the identified reference laboratories. Based on the suspected and confirmed relapsed cases reported, 12 states have been identified for inclusion under the surveillance of drug resistance in leprosy. These are Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Rajasthan, Tamilnadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Delhi. Four reference laboratories have already been identified, one each in the states of Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Tamilnadu and Delhi. Tissue samples from sentinel sites would be sent to designated laboratories for conducting the DNA sequencing tests to confirm rifampicin resistance.

Multidrug therapy in leprosy.

Leprosy is an ancient disease, which was treated by local application of chaulmoogra/hydnocarpus oil during prechemotherapeutic era. Since 1940, dapsone was the only chemotherapeutic agent used for treatment of leprosy for about three decades. Prolonged, interrupted and inadequate use of dapsone monotherapy, leads to development of dapsone-resistant cases. Usefulness of clofazimine was known in 1962. Introduction of rifampicin--a powerful bactericidal drug in 1970 has opened the avenues of multidrug therapy to treat leprosy. Multidrug therapy recommended by World Health Organisation came into practice after 1982. The regimen followed now is for duration of 6 months in paucibacillary and for the duration of 12 months in multibacillary cases. It is proven to be safe and effective. Multidrug therapy for leprosy cases is available in the form of blister calender packs and is available free of cost at all government health facilities. Although more new drugs such as ofloxacin, minocyclin, clarithromycin, etc, are known now but they are used as alternative drugs if a component of combination in multidrug therapy becomes contra-indicated. This article brings the details of various drugs used under multidrug therapy, their characteristics, side-effects, regimens and alternative drugs available for treating leprosy.

Prevention of disability in leprosy.

Leprosy is curable now-a-days if initiatives are taken for prevention of disability along with complete and regular chemotherapy. Common disabilities encountered in leprosy are: Claw hand, foot drop, lagophthalmos, plantar ulcers and depressed bridge of nose. Objectives of prevention of disabilities are preservation of nerve function, preservation of vision, to regain functional ability and self-esteem. Measures to prevent disabilities include early diagnosis and treatment with effective chemotherapy, to train leprosy cases to perform self-care practices, providing them with protective aids and referring the cases for surgery if indicated. Lepra reactions are episodes of sudden increase in the activity of the disease. Lepra reactions are treated by bed rest, analgesics rest to affected nerve by splints and a suggested course of prednisolone. Besides, leprosy-affected persons should be encouraged for self-care practices. Counselling and holding care and concern camps (POD camps) are very much integrated wtih the prevention of disabilities.

Follow-up study of pauci-bacillary leprosy on-multi-drug regimen.

One hundred and twenty nine newly registered cases of pauci-bacillary leprosy were put on Dapsone daily and Rifampicin once a month and were followed up for one year. Out of 129 cases, 108 (83.7%) were found to be clinically active at the end of one year of multidrug treatment (MDT). In 25 out of these 108 cases, skin biopsy was done and well defined granulomas were seen after therapy in 11 patients (44%).