Successful Primary Treatment of Ankle Fractures in Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy Using a Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail: A Case Series.

Background: Among diabetics, patients with peripheral neuropathy are at increased risk of developing complications following an ankle fracture. While the outcomes in these patients treated nonoperatively have been poor, the outcomes in those undergoing open reduction and internal fixation are at the best modest. We hypothesize that closed reduction and internal fixation with tibiotalocalcaneal nail is an effective primary procedure in this complication prone patient group. Methods: A retrospective review of diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy who underwent acute treatment of an ankle fracture with closed reduction and internal fixation with a tibiotalocalcaneal nail at two Level 1 trauma centers was performed. 30 patients were identified and divided into 2 groups with respect to their postoperative weight bearing protocol: 20 patients in the early weight bearing (EWB) group and 10 patients in the touch-down weight bearing (TDWB). The primary outcome was the rate of return to baseline function and the secondary outcomes included the incidence of wound dehiscence, wound infection, implant failure, loss of fixation, loss of reduction and amputation. Results: In the EWB group, 15/20 patients returned to their baseline function, 5/20 had wound dehiscence and infection, 2/20 had implant failure, 5/20 had loss of fixation, 4/20 had loss of reduction, and 4/20 underwent amputation. In the TDWB group, 9/10 patients returned to their baseline function, 1/10 had implant failure, 1/10 had loss of fixation. No patients from this group had loss of reduction or underwent amputation. Conclusion: Treatment with tibiotalocalcaneal nail is an effective primary procedure in this complication prone group of patients, assuming that weight bearing is delayed for six weeks to protect soft tissues and surgical incisions. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Potential Economic Benefits of Limited Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up After Plate Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The role of routine clinical and radiographic follow-up after clavicle fractures are healed was evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective study performed in two level-1 trauma centers included 246 adults with healed clavicle fractures treated surgically between 2000 and 2013 and at least 24-month follow-up. Based on radiographs, changes in fracture alignment or implant position from union to final follow-up were documented. The average reimbursement for a follow-up clinical visit and a clavicle radiograph was estimated. RESULTS: Mean time to union and mean time of follow-up were of 4.8 and 31.4 months, respectively. No changes in implant position or fracture alignment occurred after the fracture had healed. The amount reimbursed to our institution for two clinical visits and two clavicle radiographs was approximately $300 to $540. CONCLUSION: Once clavicle fractures are healed, further radiographic imaging does not provide any notable information. Limiting routine follow-up is safe and could be cost-effective for the healthcare system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-III retrospective cohort study.

External validation of the clinical indications of computed tomography (CT) of the head in patients with low-energy geriatric hip fractures.

INTRODUCTION: On evaluation of the clinical indications of computed tomography (CT) scan of head in the patients with low-energy geriatric hip fractures, Maniar et al. identified physical evidence of head injury, new onset confusion, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)<15 as predictive risk factors for acute findings on CT scan. The goal of the present study was to validate these three criteria as predictive risk factors for a larger population in a wider geographical distribution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥65 years of age with low-energy hip fractures from 6 trauma centers in a wide geographical distribution in the United States were included in this study. In addition to the relevant patient demographic findings, the above mentioned three criteria and acute findings on head CT scan were gathered as categorical variables. RESULTS: In total 799 patients from 6 centers were included in the study. There were 67 patients (8.3%) with positive acute findings on head CT scan. All of these patients (100%) had at least one criteria positive. There were 732 patients who had negative acute findings on head CT scan with 376 patients (51%) having at least one criteria positive and 356 patients (49%) having no criteria positive. Sensitivity of 100% and negative predictive value of 100% was observed to predict negative acute findings on head CT scan when all the three criteria were negative. CONCLUSION: With the observed 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value, physical evidence of acute head injury, acute retrograde amnesia, and GCS<15 can be recommended as a clinical decision guide for the selective use of head CT scans in geriatric patients with low energy hip fractures. All the patients with positive acute head CT findings can be predicted in the presence of at least one positive criterion. In addition, if these criteria are used as a pre-requisite to order the head CT, around 50% of the unnecessary head CT scans can be avoided.

Posterior Malleolar Fractures Associated With Tibial Shaft Fractures and Sequence of Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate posterior malleolar injuries associated with nailed tibial fractures and to determine the quality of reduction based on the sequence of fixation in associated fracture patterns. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: 1113 tibia fractures treated with an intramedullary nail at 3 level I trauma centers. INTERVENTION: Tibial shaft fractures with posterior malleolar injury were analyzed regarding type of fracture, mechanism of injury, energy of injury, fracture characteristic, surgical characteristics including sequence of fixation, obvious intraoperative displacement of the posterior malleolar fragment, and the quality of reduction. One group ("malleolus-first") consisted of patients in whom the posterior malleolus was fixed before tibial nailing and the other group ("tibia-first") included patients in whom tibial nailing was done before posterior malleolus fixation. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Intraoperative displacement, quality of reduction. RESULTS: Ninety-six of 1113 (9%) nailed tibial shaft fracture patients had a concomitant posterior malleolus fracture (9%). Of the 96 posterior malleolar fracture patients, 70 patients were operatively treated (73%). In the malleolus-first group (54 patients), intraoperative displacement of the posterior malleolar fragment was observed in 1 patient, and 1 case of poor reduction of the posterior malleolar fragment was observed (2%). In the tibia-first group (16 patients), obvious intraoperative displacement of the posterior malleolar fragment was observed in 5 patients (31%), and poor reduction of the posterior malleolar fragment was observed in 7 patients (44%). These percentages of patients with poor quality of reduction were statistically significantly different (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: Many low-energy tibia fractures with a spiral configuration do have an associated posterior malleolus fracture. In order to avoid intraoperative displacement and poor reduction, we recommend fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment before nailing of the tibia in associated fracture pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Role of Sonication for Detection of Infection in Explanted Orthopaedic Trauma Implants.

OBJECTIVES: Sonication is a new technology that uses high-frequency sound waves to mechanically dislodge bacteria adherent in biofilms. Unlike arthroplasty, its role in orthopaedic trauma has not been described. The goal of this study was to explore the utility of sonication in orthopaedic trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-six sonicated metallic orthopaedic devices from September 2010 to May 2013 were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: clinically infected, elective implant removals, and nonunion. INTERVENTION: Sonication culture results were retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing implant removal. OUTCOMES: Sonication results were the primary study outcome and were considered positive for culture growth if equal to or greater than 20 colony-forming units per plate. RESULTS: In 32 patients with clinical infection, tissue cultures were positive in 30 (94%) and negative in 2 (6%). In contrast, sonication cultures were positive in 19 patients (59%) and did not identify additional organisms. Of the 72 patients who underwent elective implant removal, 52 had pain. Sonication cultures were positive in 5 of these 52 patients (10%) and in 0 of 20 patients with no pain. Sonication culture results were negative in all 42 patients who underwent nonunion surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Sonication of orthopaedic trauma implants in patients with clinically apparent infection or "aseptic" nonunion offered negligible additional information. Sonication demonstrated a positive microbiologic yield in a subset of patients with painful implants; further research is required to better establish the frequency of subclinical infection and to determine the diagnostic role of traditional cultures and sonication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Knee Injury Associated With Acetabular Fractures: A Multicenter Study of 1273 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and pattern of the knee injury associated with acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three level I and one level II trauma centers. PATIENTS: A total of 1273 skeletally mature patients treated at 4 trauma centers between November 2004 and December 2013 for acetabular fractures were retrospectively identified from orthopaedic trauma databases. INTERVENTION: Analysis of all acetabular fractures with knee injury regarding type of acetabular fracture, mechanism of injury, energy of injury, pattern of the knee injury, knee examination findings at initial presentation, intraoperative and on follow-up, requirement for surgery/conservative management, and the associated injuries. The clinical data entered during inpatient stay and office visits were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and pattern of the knee injury. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three of 1273 patients (15%) were found to have ipsilateral knee symptoms within a period of 1 year from the date of injury. The patterns of knee injury included 56 fractures (29%), 49 ligamentous lesions (25%), and 88 miscellaneous (46%) causes including bone bruises, wounds, and swelling. Associated injuries included 85 patients with ipsilateral hip dislocation (45%), 59 pelvic injuries (31%), 61 extremity injuries (32%), 38 head injuries (20%), 37 chest injuries (20%), 23 abdominal and genitourinary injuries (12%), and 7 injuries of the spine (4%). CONCLUSION: Based on this study, we conclude that knee injuries associated with high-energy acetabular fractures constitute a significant portion of the patient population. Ligament injuries are frequently overlooked and thorough clinical evaluation and utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in selected cases will help in early detection and prevention of long-term complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous and Mucocutaneous Exposure Among Orthopaedic Surgeons: Immediate Management and Compliance With CDC Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons are at a high risk of sustaining a percutaneous or mucocutaneous exposure to blood and body fluids. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a wash with soap and water and notification of the concerned hospital authorities after any percutaneous/mucocutaneous exposure, but a systematic amenability with these guidelines is not always seen. This cross-sectional study was undertaken to determine current knowledge and practices of orthopaedic surgeons in case of a percutaneous sharp injury exposure, emphasizes the immediate first aid steps taken after an exposure, the degree of reporting, and to explore the reasons for noncompliance. Finally, we sought to create awareness about the prevailing Center for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines after any exposure to blood or body fluids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey using an anonymous prepared questionnaire. The study population included exclusively orthopaedic surgeons, including residents, fellows, and attending physicians at 4 US institutions. The questionnaire was also available online on the OTA Web site as a part of survey monkey. The questionnaire comprised 9 multiple choice questions, and more than 1 response could be given for some questions. The questions addressed previous needle stick/sharp injury exposure, number of times that had happened, whether reported to the hospital administration, reason for nonreporting, and risk perception for transmission of blood-borne pathogens (human immunodeficiency virus, HBsAg, and hepatitis C virus). The questions were also asked based on what should be done in four different clinical settings based on respondents risk perception. RESULTS: Of fifty eight attendings, 7 fellows, 45 residents, and 7 respondents who did not indicate their position participated in the survey for a total of 117 respondents. Out of 99, 24 had sustained it once, 18 twice, 11 three times, and 35 at least 4 times. When questioned about informing the incident to the hospital administration, 38% had always reported the incident, 33% had never reported the incident, and the remaining 29% had not reported it every time. Of note, 87% gave the correct response about the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus after an exposure. On questioning about the risk of hepatitis B transmission, from an HBsAg- and HBeAg-positive source, 13% gave the correct response, whereas from HBsAg-positive and HBeAg-negative source, 30% gave the correct response. Regarding transmission of hepatitis C virus from a positive source, 36% responded correctly. The surgeons seemingly attempted to risk stratify their exposure, and they were more likely to report their exposure in the higher risk scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that orthopaedic surgeons of all levels of training are at high risk of occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens. Moreover, despite the level of training, the majority of surgeons do not follow the recommended steps, although we do not know the reasons for such behavior. Also, there is a low awareness of the significant risk of hepatitis transmission among orthopaedic surgeons treating a population with a high prevalence of undiagnosed hepatitis.