RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the outcome of cancer patients undergoing systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) at our centre to help inform future clinical decision-making around SACT during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients receiving at least one episode of SACT for solid tumours at Guy's Cancer Centre between 1 March and 31 May 2020 and the same period in 2019 were included in the study. Data were collected on demographics, tumour type/stage, treatment type (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biological-targeted) and SARS-CoV2 infection. RESULTS: A total of 2120 patients received SACT in 2020, compared to 2449 in 2019 (13% decrease). From 2019 to 2020, there was an increase in stage IV disease (62% vs. 72%), decrease in chemotherapy (42% vs. 34%), increase in immunotherapy (6% vs. 10%), but similar rates of biologically targeted treatments (37% vs. 38%). There was a significant increase in 1st and 2nd line treatments in 2020 (68% vs. 81%; p < 0.0001) and reduction in 3rd and subsequent lines (26% vs. 15%; p = 0.004) compared to 2019. Of the 2020 cohort, 2% patients developed SARS-CoV2 infections. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data from a tertiary Cancer Centre suggest that despite the challenges faced due to the COVID-19 pandemic, SACT was able to be continued without any significant effects on the mortality of solid-tumour patients. There was a low rate (2%) of SARS-CoV-2 infection which is comparable to the 1.4%-point prevalence in our total cancer population.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Extranodal extension (ENE) is an independent prognosticator in head-neck Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). All patients with ENE, however, do not behave the same, and there is a need for further risk stratification. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of various grades of ENE and the number of nodes with ENE on overall survival (OS) in oral cavity SCC (OCSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with node-positive OCSCC treated with primary surgery and appropriate adjuvant therapy during the year 2011 were evaluated. Surgical histopathology slides of all patients were reviewed, and ENE was graded according to the grading system proposed by Lewis Jr et al. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, lymph node density (LND) greater than or equal to 0.12 (P = 0.013), the presence of ENE in more than two nodes (P = 0.006), and ENE grade 3 through 4 (P = 0.035) were associated with worse (OS). Conventional prognostic factors such as tumor (T) stage, nodal (N) stage, stage grouping, depth of invasion, and pattern of invasion did not have a significant impact on OS. On multivariate analysis, the presence of ENE in more than two nodes (P = 0.018) independently predicted a worse OS. Extranodal extension grade 3 through 4 showed a trend toward significance (P = 0.08). A combination of LND greater than or equal to 0.12, ENE grade 3 through 4, and ENE in more than two lymph nodes conferred the poorest prognosis (3-year OS: 18%; P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: In patients with ENE and advanced nodal disease, T stage, N stage, stage group, depth, and pattern of invasion lose their impact on OS. In patients with ENE, nodal characteristics such as LND, the number of nodes with ENE, and grade of ENE serve as important prognosticators and aid in further risk stratification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:1130-1136, 2019.
