Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 15(6): e1, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661171

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes (T3cDM) secondary to chronic pancreatitis (CP) arises due to endocrine dysfunction and metabolic dysregulations. Currently, diagnostic tests are not available to identify patients who may progress from normoglycemia to hyperglycemia in CP. We conducted plasma metabolomic profiling to diagnose glycemic alterations early in the course of disease. METHODS: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to generate untargeted, targeted plasma metabolomic profiles in patients with CP, controls (n = 445) following TRIPOD guidelines. Patients were stratified based on glucose tolerance tests following ADA guidelines. Multivariate analysis was performed using partial least squares discriminant analysis to assess discriminatory ability of metabolites among stratified groups. COMBIROC and logistic regression were used to derive biomarker signatures. AI-ML tool (Rapidminer) was used to verify these preliminary results. RESULTS: Ceramide, lysophosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), phosphatidylethanolamine, carnitine, and lysophosphatidylcholine discriminated T3cDM CP patients from healthy controls with AUC 93% (95% CI 0.81-0.98, P < 0.0001), and integration with pancreatic morphology improved AUC to 100% (95% CI 0.93-1.00, P < 0.0001). LPA, phosphatidylinositol, and ceramide discriminated nondiabetic CP with glycemic alterations (pre-diabetic CP); AUC 66% (95% CI 0.55-0.76, P = 0.1), and integration enhanced AUC to 74% (95% CI 0.55-0.88, P = 0.86). T3cDM was distinguished from prediabetic by LPA, phosphatidylinositol, and sphinganine (AUC 70%; 95% CI 0.54-0.83, P = 0.08), and integration improved AUC to 83% (95% CI 0.68-0.93, P = 0.05). CombiROC cutoff identified 75% and 78% prediabetes in validation 1 and 2 cohorts. Random forest algorithm assessed performance of integrated panel demonstrating AUC of 72% in predicting glycemic alterations. DISCUSSION: We report for the first time that a panel of metabolites integrated with pancreatic morphology detects glycemia progression before HbA1c in patients with CP.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Hemoglobina Glucada , Metabolómica , Pancreatitis Crónica , Estado Prediabético , Humanos , Masculino , Pancreatitis Crónica/sangre , Pancreatitis Crónica/diagnóstico , Estado Prediabético/sangre , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Metabolómica/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Lisofosfolípidos/sangre , Lisofosfolípidos/metabolismo , Carnitina/sangre , Carnitina/análogos & derivados , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Ceramidas/sangre , Glucemia/análisis , Glucemia/metabolismo , Anciano , Cromatografía Liquida , Páncreas/patología , Páncreas/metabolismo , Metaboloma , Lisofosfatidilcolinas/sangre
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(21)2023 Oct 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37958411

RESUMEN

Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, emphasizing the need for improved diagnostic and treatment approaches. In recent years, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked considerable interest in its potential role in lung cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of AI applications in lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. AI algorithms like machine learning, deep learning, and radiomics have shown remarkable capabilities in the detection and characterization of lung nodules, thereby aiding in accurate lung cancer screening and diagnosis. These systems can analyze various imaging modalities, such as low-dose CT scans, PET-CT imaging, and even chest radiographs, accurately identifying suspicious nodules and facilitating timely intervention. AI models have exhibited promise in utilizing biomarkers and tumor markers as supplementary screening tools, effectively enhancing the specificity and accuracy of early detection. These models can accurately distinguish between benign and malignant lung nodules, assisting radiologists in making more accurate and informed diagnostic decisions. Additionally, AI algorithms hold the potential to integrate multiple imaging modalities and clinical data, providing a more comprehensive diagnostic assessment. By utilizing high-quality data, including patient demographics, clinical history, and genetic profiles, AI models can predict treatment responses and guide the selection of optimal therapies. Notably, these models have shown considerable success in predicting the likelihood of response and recurrence following targeted therapies and optimizing radiation therapy for lung cancer patients. Implementing these AI tools in clinical practice can aid in the early diagnosis and timely management of lung cancer and potentially improve outcomes, including the mortality and morbidity of the patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA