Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Myol ; 39(2): 57-66, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32904925

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Since February 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 in Italy has forced the health care system to undergo profound rearrangements in its services and facilities, especially in the worst-hit areas in Northern Italy. In this setting, inpatient and outpatient services had to rethink and reorganize their activities to meet the needs of patients during the "lockdown". The Italian Association of Myology developed a survey to estimate the impact of these changes on patients affected by neuromuscular disorders and on specialized neuromuscular centers during the acute phase of COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We developed an electronic survey that was sent to neuromuscular centers affiliated with the Italian Association of Myology, assessing changes in pharmacological therapies provision, outpatient clinical and instrumental services, support services (physiotherapy, nursing care, psychological support) and clinical trials. RESULTS: 40% of surveyed neuromuscular centers reported a reduction in outpatient visit and examinations (44.5% of centers in Northern regions; 25% of centers in Central regions; 50% of centers in Southern regions). Twenty-two% of centers postponed in-hospital administration of therapies for neuromuscular diseases (23.4% in Northern regions; 13.0% in Central regions; 20% in Southern regions). Diagnostic and support services (physiotherapy, nursing care, psychological support) were suspended in 57% of centers (66/43/44% in Northern, Central and Southern centers respectively) Overall, the most affected services were rehabilitative services and on-site outpatient visits, which were suspended in 93% of centers. Strategies adopted by neuromuscular centers to overcome these changes included maintaining urgent on-site visits, addressing patients to available services and promoting remote contact and telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant disruption of clinical and support services for patients with neuromuscular diseases. Despite the efforts to provide telemedicine consults to patients, this option could be promoted and improved further. A close collaboration between the different neuromuscular centers and service providers as well as further implementation of telehealth platforms are necessary to ensure quality care to NMD patients in the near future and in case of recurrent pandemic waves.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermedades Neuromusculares/terapia , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Atención Ambulatoria , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Hospitalización , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
J Neurol Sci ; 228(1): 71-4, 2005 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15607213

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC) is a multidimensional, MS-specific outcome measure for use in clinical trials, comprising three tests: timed 25-foot walk (T25FW), paced auditory serial addition (PASAT), and 9-hole peg (9HP). OBJECTIVE: To assess interrater and intrarater reliability and practice/fatigue effects in the MSFC. METHODS: The MSFC was administered by two neurologists after a formal training session to 32 MS outpatients. Patients were assessed four times by one examiner and twice by the other. The six tests were administered in a single day, with at least 20 min of rest between them. The examiners were blinded to the results of previous assessments. Testing order was random. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.93 for 9HP (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.96) to 0.99 for T25FW (95% CI 0.97-0.99). For intrarater reliability, ICC ranged from 0.93 for PASAT (95% CI 0.82-0.97) to 0.98 for T25FW (95% CI 0.93-1.00). We found no practice effect for T25FW after the first administration. However, performance improved with testing over the first three sessions for PASAT and over the first four sessions for 9HP. CONCLUSIONS: The MSFC is characterised by excellent reliability. Practice effects for the three MSFC components differed, being negligible for T25FW and evident for PASAT and 9HP. To improve efficiency, we suggest one prebaseline administration of T25FW, three of PASAT and four of 9HP.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Esclerosis Múltiple/fisiopatología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Método Doble Ciego , Fatiga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Examen Neurológico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA