Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: reasons for failure.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a widely performed and safe procedure for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction manifested as epiphora or dacryocystitis. Current success rates are above 90%. Data on causes for failure of the procedure are sparse. We investigated the influence of several preoperative parameters on surgery outcome and to establish that parameters are linked with failure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic DCR in the Tel-Aviv Medical Center, a tertiary referral center, between January 2010 and August 2016 were retrospectively examined and data on the occurrence of surgical failure and reasons for failure were retrieved. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients (183 eyes) were included. The overall success rate for the surgery was 94.7%. The parameters that correlated significantly with failure were coexisting diabetes mellitus (P = 0.037), allergy to medications (P = 0.034), and prior ocular surgery (P = 0.043). There was no correlation between the surgical failure rates and facial trauma, previous nasal or lacrimal surgery, or the usage of a stent. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic DCR is a safe and effective surgical procedure. Diabetes mellitus, allergies, and previous ocular surgery may lead to surgical failure. Patients with these risk factors should be aware of increased failure rates.

[CLINICAL AND ARTHROSCOPIC FINDINGS IN MENISCAL INJURY AND KNEE INSTABILITY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY].

INTRODUCTION: Medical history and physical examination are expected to provide the basic knowledge allowing diagnosis of a disease and thus enabling to plan the course of treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine this hypothesis by comparing pre-operative diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries to final surgical findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively compared the pre-surgical diagnosis to the arthroscopic findings in 753 arthroscopic procedures. RESULTS: Clinical diagnosis of a medial meniscal (MM) tear was proven by arthroscopy in 65% of cases. Clinical diagnosis of a lateral meniscal (LM) tear was proven by arthroscopy in 54% of cases. Clinical complaints of instability correlated with partial or complete ACL rupture in 85% of cases. The accuracy of the clinical examination concerning ACL integrity ranged from 86% to 90%. Lachman and Pivot tests were slightly superior to the Drawer test. DISCUSSION: Arthroscopic surgery is the most common surgical procedure in orthopedics. The diagnosis, which is based on history and physical examination in most cases, allows proper management of the case and an appropriate treatment plan. In most scenarios, these operations are conducted based on the diagnosis and treatment performed before surgery. In this study we showed that even in experienced and skilled hands, a clinical diagnosis of meniscal tear was approved by arthroscopy in only 54% to 65% of cases. A clinical diagnosis of ACL injury was approved by arthroscopy, in 99% of cases. CONCLUSION: When planning conservative treatment or surgical intervention for a knee injury, it should be kept in mind that the clinical diagnosis of ACL rupture is highly reliable, while the clinical diagnosis of meniscal injury is only moderately reliable. Thus, especially when planning surgical intervention, the utilization of further imaging would be desirable when isolated meniscal injury is suspected.

Reduced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Vascularization Is Associated With Chondral Knee Lesions.

This study tested the association between periligamentous vascularization of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the presence of chondral knee lesions via retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 702 consecutive knee arthroscopic procedures. In each case, the ACL periligamentous envelope was documented as follows: (1) vascular, where the ACL was covered with blood vessels along its entire length; (2) centrally avascular, where the central third of the ACL was not covered but peripheral vascularized coverage was present; and (3) avascular, where there was no blood vessel coverage of the ACL. Inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: (1) age older than 18 years and (2) normal knee ligament laxity. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to test the association between chondral lesions and each of the variables: sex, age, meniscus tear, decreased ACL vascularity, and concomitant chondral lesion in another knee compartment. The cohort included 516 knees. In the univariate analysis, all variables were associated with a chondral lesion, but only older age and decreased ACL vascularity were associated with chondral lesions in each knee compartment. In the regression model, only decreased ACL vascularity was associated with chondral lesions in each knee compartment. For avascular knees, the odds ratio was 2.84 for medial femoral condyle lesions (95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.68; P=.000), 2.44 for lateral femoral condyle lesions (95% confidence interval, 1.19-5.03; P=.015), and 2.48 for patellofemoral lesions (95% confidence interval, 1.55-3.97; P=.000). The findings showed that decreased ACL periligamentous vascularization is associated with chondral lesions of the femoral condyles in knees with preserved ACL laxity. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):e737-e743.].