Assessment of frailty and related outcomes in older patients with heart failure: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in older patients. Frailty is prevalent and complicates the course of HF. We sought to investigate the impact of frailty on HF outcomes. METHODS: Patients over 65 years old hospitalized with acute decompensated HF and mildly reduced or preserved EF, between September 2017 and September 2019 were enrolled in the study. Before hospital discharge at euvolemic state, patients underwent six-minute walk test (6MWT) and frailty assessment using FRIED and modified SOF scores. Predictors of death, readmissions, and increase in diuretic dose were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: We enrolled 193 consecutive patients (mean age 78.6 ± 8.4 years, 29.5% males, 59.6% with HF and preserved EF). All patients had at least one comorbidity (40.9% coronary artery disease, 71% diabetes, and 86% hypertension). The mean 6MWT distance was 316.2 meters. According to FRIED score, 4.7% were normal and 17.6% were categorized as pre-frail and 77.7% as frail, while according to SOF index 9.8% were normal, 15% were categorized as pre-frail and 75.1% as frail. Frail patients according to both indices had a higher risk of 90-day readmissions, uptitration of diuretics within 90 days (p < 0.001 for both) and numerically but not significantly higher risk of death. Frailty status was independently associated with higher risk of 90-day readmissions, uptitration of diuretics, and higher BNP at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty in older patients with HF is common and associated with worse prognosis. Pre-discharge frailty assessment may aid in identification of patients at high-risk for short-term complications.

Functional electrical stimulation of peripheral muscles improves endothelial function and clinical and emotional status in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) improves exercise capacity, quality of life, emotional stress, and endothelial function in chronic heart failure with impaired systolic function. We sought to investigate the effects of FES on the above parameters in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: Thirty HFpEF patients, 18 female and 12 male, aged 69 ± 8 years, in New York Heart Association class II or III and with mean ejection fraction 63% ± 6%, were randomly (1:1) assigned to a 6-week FES program or placebo. Assessment was performed at baseline and after completion of training protocol and included 6-minute walked distance, quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory and Zung self-rated depression scores), B-type natriuretic peptide, endothelial function (flow-mediated dilatation), and left ventricular diastolic function. RESULTS: A significant improvement in 6-minute walked distance (F = 21.61, P = .001), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary (F = 8.68, P = .006), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (F = 6.43, P = .017), Beck Depression Inventory (F = 6.66, P = .015), Zung (F = 6.25, P = .019), and flow-mediated dilatation diameter (F = 11.98, P = .002) was observed in the FES group compared with placebo group; B-type natriuretic peptide also declined but not significantly (F = 0.249, P = .622), and there was a tendency toward lower mitral E/e' wave ratio (F = 3.066, P = .091). CONCLUSION: As in heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, FES also improves exercise capacity, quality of life, emotional status, and endothelial function in HFpEF. Given the lack of effective evidence-based therapies in these patients, FES warrants further investigation.