Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 153(3): 346-352, 2020 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679011

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine adherence to Choosing Wisely recommendations for using serum lipase to diagnose acute pancreatitis rather than amylase, avoiding concurrent amylase/lipase testing and avoiding serial measurements after the first elevated test as both are ineffective for tracking disease course. METHODS: Deidentified laboratory data from four large health systems were analyzed to determine concurrent testing rates, serial testing rates, and provider-ordering patterns. RESULTS: While most providers adhered to recommendations with 58,693 lipase-only tests ordered and performed, 86% of amylase tests were performed concurrently with lipase. Ambulatory, inpatient, and emergency department settings revealed concurrent rates of 51%, 41%, and 8%, respectively. Services with order sets containing both amylase and lipase were associated with higher rates of concurrent testing. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent amylase/lipase testing is an area of opportunity to improve compliance, especially in ambulatory settings. Revision of order sets and provider education could be interventions to reduce unnecessary testing and save costs.


Asunto(s)
Amilasas/sangre , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Lipasa/sangre , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Humanos , Pancreatitis/sangre , Pancreatitis/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA