Internal audit of oncological results in gastric cancer surgery.

INTRODUCTION: National information on the oncological results of gastric cancer surgery is scarce, so foreign figures are used, which may completely differ from local ones. The aim of our study is to analyse these results in the patients operated on in our centre. METHODS: Survival results of 134 patients that underwent gastric cancer surgery with curative intent from 2004 to June 2016 were analysed. RESULTS: A percentage of 76.8 of the patients (103/134) presented in advanced clinical stages (≥ii). Staging laparoscopy was performed in 67% of them (69/103), an extensive lymphadenectomy (≥LD1+) was carried out in 89.3% of patients (92/103), and 76.7% (79/103) received perioperative chemotherapy. The distribution by pathological stage 0, i, ii, iii and iv was 8.2, 20.2, 26.1, 37.3, and 8.2%, respectively. Median follow-up was 87 months. Median OS was 68 months and one-, 3- and 5-year OS were 81.2, 62, and 53.8%, respectively. The 5-year OS according to pathological staging was 100% for stage 0, 88.4% for stage i, 62.5% for stage ii, 23.6% for stage iii and 17% for stage iv. CONCLUSIONS: Our survival rates are in the high ranges of western literature. These results could not be compared with national ones due to the lack of information regarding oncological outcomes in gastric cancer surgery in our closest environment.

Internal audit of oncological results in gastric cancer surgery. / Auditoría interna de resultados oncológicos en la cirugía del cáncer gástrico.

INTRODUCTION: National information on the oncological results of gastric cancer surgery is scarce, so foreign figures are used, which may completely differ from local ones. The aim of our study is to analyse these results in the patients operated on in our centre. METHODS: Survival results of 134 patients that underwent gastric cancer surgery with curative intent from 2004 to June 2016 were analysed. RESULTS: A percentage of 76.8 of the patients (103/134) presented in advanced clinical stages (≥ii). Staging laparoscopy was performed in 67% of them (69/103), an extensive lymphadenectomy (≥LD1+) was carried out in 89.3% of patients (92/103), and 76.7% (79/103) received perioperative chemotherapy. The distribution by pathological stage 0, i, ii, iii and iv was 8.2, 20.2, 26.1, 37.3, and 8.2%, respectively. Median follow-up was 87 months. Median OS was 68 months and one-, 3- and 5-year OS were 81.2, 62, and 53.8%, respectively. The 5-year OS according to pathological staging was 100% for stage 0, 88.4% for stage i, 62.5% for stage ii, 23.6% for stage iii and 17% for stage iv. CONCLUSIONS: Our survival rates are in the high ranges of western literature. These results could not be compared with national ones due to the lack of information regarding oncological outcomes in gastric cancer surgery in our closest environment.

Systematic Second-look Surgery Plus HIPEC in Patients Without Evidence of Recurrence, at High Risk of Carcinomatosis After Colorectal Cancer Resection. / Cirugía de second look más HIPEC en pacientes sin evidencia de recidiva con alto riesgo de desarrollar carcinomatosis tras resección de cáncer colorrectal.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze the impact of systematic second-look surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) performed 1 year after resection of the primary tumor, in asymptomatic patients at high risk of developing peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). METHODS: Between 2012-2016, 33 patients without any sign of peritoneal recurrence on imaging studies were prospectively included in the study and underwent second-look surgery aimed at treating limited PC earlier and were prospectively recorded. They were selected based on 5 primary tumor-associated criteria: resected minimal synchronous macroscopic PC (n = 10), synchronous ovarian metastases (n = 2), positive peritoneal cytology (n = 2), pT4 primary tumors (n = 15) and perforation (n = 4). RESULTS: PC was found and treated by cytoreduction plus HIPEC in 10 of the 33 (30.3%) patients, although it was detected in only 2/15 patients of the pT4 subgroup (13.3%). The patients without PC underwent complete abdominal exploration plus HIPEC. Median follow-up was 14.5 months. One patient died postoperatively at day 55. Severe morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo III-V) was low (15.2%). The 3-year overall survival rate was 93% and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 33%. Peritoneal recurrences occurred in 4 patients (12.1%), 2 of whom had macroscopic PC discovered at the second-look (20%), while the other 2 patients had no macroscopic PC (8.7%) (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The second look + HIPEC strategy in our series of patients at high risk of developing PC, allows its early detection and its treatment in 30.3% of cases, with a very low rate of peritoneal recurrence. It is important to continue evaluating the results to increase the accuracy of the inclusion criteria, especially the pT4 criterion that in this series has a low predictive power for the occurrence of PC.

Cirugía de second look más HIPEC en pacientes sin evidencia de recidiva con alto riesgo de desarrollar carcinomatosis tras resección de cáncer colorrectal / Systematic Second-look Surgery Plus HIPEC in Patients Without Evidence of Recurrence, at High Risk of Carcinomatosis After Colorectal Cancer Resection

Introducción: Analizar el impacto de la cirugía de second look (CSL) combinada con quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (HIPEC) realizada un año después de la cirugía del tumor primario en pacientes asintomáticos con alto riesgo de desarrollar carcinomatosis peritoneal (CP) tras resección de cáncer colorrectal. Métodos: Entre febrero 2012 y febrero 2016, 33 pacientes con alto riesgo de recidiva peritoneal, sin signos de recurrencia en pruebas de imagen fueron prospectivamente incluidos en el estudio y sometidos a CSL con el objetivo de tratar posibles recidivas peritoneales precozmente. Los pacientes fueron seleccionados por 5 criterios: pT4 (n = 15), citología peritoneal positiva por cáncer (n = 2), tumor perforado (n = 4), enfermedad peritoneal sincrónica resecada (n = 10), metástasis ováricas sincrónicas resecadas (n = 2). Resultados: Se detectó carcinomatosis peritoneal (CP) en 10 de los 33 pacientes (30,3%) (CP+), en los cuales se realizó citorreducción completa más HIPEC. En el subgrupo de los pacientes pT4 (n = 15) se detectó CP solo en 2 casos (13,3%). El resto de los pacientes (CP-) fueron sometidos a HIPEC profiláctica. La mediana de seguimiento después de CSL ha sido de 14,5 meses. La tasa de morbilidad postoperatoria grave (Clavien-Dindo III-V) fue del 15,2% (5/33) y la mortalidad del 3,0% (1 paciente al 55.° día postoperatorio). La supervivencia global a 3 años fue del 93% y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad del 33%. Tras CSL + HIPEC, 4/33 pacientes (12,1%) recidivaron en el peritoneo, 2 CP + (20%) y 2 CP - (8,7%) (p = 0,04). Conclusiones: La realización de CSL + HIPEC en nuestra serie de pacientes con alto riesgo de desarrollar CP permite su detección temprana y su tratamiento en el 30,3% de los casos, con una tasa muy baja de recurrencia peritoneal posterior. Es importante continuar evaluando los resultados para aumentar la precisión de los criterios de inclusión, especialmente del criterio pT4, que en esta serie tiene un bajo poder predictivo para la aparición de CP (AU)

Introduction: To analyze the impact of systematic second-look surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) performed 1 year after resection of the primary tumor, in asymptomatic patients at high risk of developing peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Methods: Between 2012-2016, 33 patients without any sign of peritoneal recurrence on imaging studies were prospectively included in the study and underwent second-look surgery aimed at treating limited PC earlier and were prospectively recorded. They were selected based on 5 primary tumor-associated criteria: resected minimal synchronous macroscopic PC (n = 10), synchronous ovarian metastases (n = 2), positive peritoneal cytology (n = 2), pT4 primary tumors (n = 15) and perforation (n = 4). Results: PC was found and treated by cytoreduction plus HIPEC in 10 of the 33 (30.3%) patients, although it was detected in only 2/15 patients of the pT4 subgroup (13.3%). The patients without PC underwent complete abdominal exploration plus HIPEC. Median follow-up was 14.5 months. One patient died postoperatively at day 55. Severe morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo III-V) was low (15.2%). The 3-year overall survival rate was 93% and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 33%. Peritoneal recurrences occurred in 4 patients (12.1%), 2 of whom had macroscopic PC discovered at the second-look (20%), while the other 2 patients had no macroscopic PC (8.7%) (P = .04). Conclusions: The second look + HIPEC strategy in our series of patients at high risk of developing PC, allows its early detection and its treatment in 30.3% of cases, with a very low rate of peritoneal recurrence. It is important to continue evaluating the results to increase the accuracy of the inclusion criteria, especially the pT4 criterion that in this series has a low predictive power for the occurrence of PC (AU)

[Cervical sympathetic chain schwannoma associated with parathyroid adenoma]. / Schwannoma de la cadena simpática cervical asociado a adenoma paratiroideo.

BACKGROUND: Schwannoma is a rare benign tumor derived from nerve sheaths. When derived from the cervical sympathetic chain, it usually presents itself as an asymptomatic mass located in the posterior cervical region, at paravertebral level. Its diagnosis is not easy, usually requiring multiple imaging tests. Its differential diagnosis includes parathyroid adenoma. CLINICAL CASE: A new case of schwannoma of the cervical sympathetic chain in a patient with a synchronous overactive parathyroid adenoma is reported. This case adds to the sixty described in the literature, although to our knowledge no association between schwannoma and parathyroid adenoma has been reported to date. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a benign tumor, its treatment is a complete surgical resection. The most common complication after the surgery needed for these tumors is ipsilateral Horner syndrome.

Biliary cystadenoma.

The diagnosis of cystadenoma is rare, even more so when located in the extrahepatic bile duct. Unspecific clinical signs may lead this pathology to be misdiagnosed. The need for pathological anatomy in order to distinguish cystadenomas from simple biliary cysts is crucial. The most usual treatment nowadays is resection of the bile duct, together with cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

Risk of gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture with multifilament and monofilament sutures after hand-sewn laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Gastrojejunal (GJ) stricture is one of the most common late complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) with a hand-sewn anastomosis. The object of this study was to assess the risk of stricture for two types of resorbable suture (multifilament and monofilament) in a series of LRYGBPs performed by the same surgeon. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. The study population consisted of a series of consecutive morbidly obese patients who underwent primary hand-sewn LRYGBP between March 2004 and May 2008 at the University Hospital in Getafe, Madrid, Spain. The study comprised 242 LRYGBPs with a four-layer continuous hand-sewn anastomosis using absorbable 3/0 gauge suture. The suture material was Ethicon Vicryl multifilament in the first 105 cases and Ethicon Monocryl monofilament in the following 137 cases. All patients were followed up monthly for the first 6 months and then every 6 months after that. RESULTS: The mean BMI was 46 +/- 4 for the multifilament cohort and 48 +/- 6 for the monofilament cohort with no significant difference between the two (p = 0.567). There were no anastomotic leaks, and no cases of marginal ulcer, abscess, abdominal sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism were recorded. No cases required conversion to open surgery, and perioperative mortality was zero. In all, 11 cases of stricture (4.4%) were recorded, 10 in the multifilament suture cohort (9.5%), and only one in the monofilament suture cohort (0.7%; p = 0.001). The odds ratio was 14.3 (95% CI = 1.8-113.4). The mean outpatient follow-up period was 30 months (range = 6-42). CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic GJ stricture is a common and well-known complication of laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Hand sewing with monofilament suture significantly lowered the frequency of this complication, and hence, monofilament should be the suture material of choice for this suturing technique.